Citroen Berlingo MOT Results

Registered in 2010
57.8% pass rate
from 8,697 tests in 2017
(4.3% worse than other 2010 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Berlingo is unusually good or bad.

  • 28% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (17% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 13% fail on Registration plate lamp (29% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 9.5% fail on Stop lamp (55% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 8.6% fail on Position lamps (22% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 7.7% fail on Front lamps (38% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Rear lamps (38% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.034% fail on All position lamps (76% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.3% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.011% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.011% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 1.9% fail on Direction indicators (31% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Flashing type (31% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.25% fail on Side repeaters (68% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.24% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.011% fail on Switch
    • 1.8% fail on Horn (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.79% fail on Rear fog lamp (55% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.76% fail on Fog lamp (57% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.046% fail on Switch
    • 0.15% fail on Battery
    • 0.15% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.14% fail on Hazard warning (54% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.080% fail on Switch (63% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.057% fail on Lamp
    • 0.069% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.023% fail on Trailer electrical socket (82% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.023% fail on Rear reflectors (92% better than other 2010 vans)
  • 12% fail on Suspension (10% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Coil springs (100% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.5% fail on Condition (100% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.092% fail on Location
    • 4.3% fail on Drive shafts (53% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.3% fail on Front drive shafts (55% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 4.3% fail on Constant velocity joints (56% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.011% fail on Couplings
        • 0.011% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.023% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.023% fail on Drive shafts
    • 2.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (41% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (31% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (55% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.057% fail on Linkage condition (83% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Suspension arms (40% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (39% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.011% fail on Attachment
    • 0.68% fail on Front suspension joints (30% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.22% fail on Macpherson strut (44% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Condition (44% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.20% fail on Wheel bearings (82% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Front (87% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.080% fail on Rear (67% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.10% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.10% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.10% fail on Shock absorbers (91% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Condition (91% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.092% fail on Radius arms (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.080% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.011% fail on Attachment
    • 0.023% fail on General condition
    • 0.023% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.023% fail on Condition
    • 0.023% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.023% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.011% fail on Torque/reaction arms
      • 0.011% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.011% fail on Axles
      • 0.011% fail on Swivel joints/housing
    • 0.011% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 7.7% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.0% fail on Washers (29% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Wipers (26% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.93% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.46% fail on Mirrors (40% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.034% fail on Bonnet
  • 7.7% fail on Brakes (35% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Hub components
      • 3.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.57% fail on Brake discs (46% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.023% fail on Brake calipers (86% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.011% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.011% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 2.0% fail on Brake performance (62% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Rear wheels (49% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.60% fail on Front wheels (36% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Parking brake performance (90% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Service brake performance (59% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Brake imbalance (64% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.023% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.011% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.0% fail on Hydraulic systems (64% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.92% fail on Components (64% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.39% fail on Valves (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.30% fail on Hoses
        • 0.17% fail on Pipes (92% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.092% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.011% fail on Cylinders
      • 0.057% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.046% fail on Leaks
      • 0.011% fail on Operation
    • 0.80% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.80% fail on Pedal
        • 0.79% fail on Anti-slip (37% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.011% fail on Condition
    • 0.62% fail on ABS
    • 0.10% fail on Parking brake (88% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Condition (88% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.10% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.092% fail on Cable
      • 0.011% fail on Lever
    • 0.057% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.011% fail on Additional braking devices
  • 7.1% fail on Tyres (14% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.8% fail on Tread depth (32% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.17% fail on Size/type
    • 0.10% fail on Valve stem
  • 1.8% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (40% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Seat belts (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Condition (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Requirements (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.046% fail on Attachment
      • 0.011% fail on Installation check
        • 0.011% fail on Anchorage's
      • 0.011% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.29% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (53% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (50% better than other 2010 vans)
  • 1.6% fail on Steering (56% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Steering system (57% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Track rod end (58% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.034% fail on Free play
        • 0.034% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.023% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.011% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.20% fail on Power steering (53% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Other components
      • 0.034% fail on Pipes and hoses (77% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.011% fail on Pump
      • 0.011% fail on Rams
    • 0.069% fail on Steering control
      • 0.023% fail on Steering column
      • 0.023% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.023% fail on Universal joint
      • 0.011% fail on Steering lock
      • 0.011% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.034% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.011% fail on Locking devices
  • 1.2% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (28% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.59% fail on Exhaust system (35% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.32% fail on Fuel system (51% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Cap
      • 0.080% fail on System (62% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.023% fail on Tank (79% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.023% fail on Pipe
    • 0.22% fail on Emissions (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 0.98% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.30% fail on Body condition
    • 0.26% fail on Doors
      • 0.13% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.10% fail on Drivers
      • 0.046% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.21% fail on Seats
      • 0.13% fail on Passengers (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.080% fail on Drivers
    • 0.14% fail on Spare wheel (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.034% fail on Load security
      • 0.011% fail on Bootlid
      • 0.011% fail on Tailgate
      • 0.011% fail on Loading door
    • 0.023% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.023% fail on Body security
    • 0.011% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.49% fail on Registration plates and VIN (39% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.49% fail on Registration plate (39% better than other 2010 vans)
  • 0.20% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.10% fail on Attachment
    • 0.092% fail on Condition
  • 0.011% fail on Towbars
    • 0.011% fail on Towbar