MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Citroen » Berlingo » 2010
Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Citroen Berlingo MOT Results

Registered in 2010
55.8% pass rate
from 9,629 tests in 2020
(4.3% worse than other 2010 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Berlingo is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (14% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 8.9% fail on Stop lamp (46% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 7.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (24% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Position lamps (24% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.4% fail on Position lamp (26% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.052% fail on All position lamps
    • 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.43% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.6% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.052% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.010% fail on Dipswitch
      • 0.010% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 2.4% fail on Electrical equipment (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Horn (200% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.052% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.010% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 1.8% fail on Direction indicators (32% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Flashing type (32% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.16% fail on Side repeaters (82% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.10% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.70% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (64% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.69% fail on Rear fog lamp (64% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.66% fail on Rear fog lamp (65% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.031% fail on Switch
      • 0.010% fail on Front fog lamps
        • 0.010% fail on Front fog lamp switch
    • 0.19% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.19% fail on Switch
    • 0.11% fail on Reversing lamps (82% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Reversing lamps (81% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.062% fail on Rear reflectors (82% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.042% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.042% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 11% fail on Suspension (21% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.5% fail on Springs (46% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 5.5% fail on Coil springs (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 5.4% fail on Coil spring (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.042% fail on Mounting
    • 3.2% fail on Anti-roll bars (43% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.54% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.39% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (60% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint dust cover (53% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Linkage (71% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.083% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (85% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.031% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.021% fail on Pins and bushes (98% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.010% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.010% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.1% fail on Suspension arms (30% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint (26% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes (31% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.45% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.021% fail on Suspension arm
    • 0.47% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.43% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.021% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.021% fail on Ball joint dust cover (79% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.24% fail on Wheel bearings (82% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.22% fail on Shock absorbers (76% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.19% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.042% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.021% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.010% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.073% fail on Axles
      • 0.042% fail on Axle
      • 0.031% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.042% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (89% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.031% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.021% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.010% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.021% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.021% fail on Ball joint
  • 9.0% fail on Body, chassis, structure (37% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 7.0% fail on Transmission (99% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 6.9% fail on Drive shafts (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 6.9% fail on Joints (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.021% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.17% fail on Prop shafts (55% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.17% fail on Joints
    • 0.79% fail on Exhaust system (34% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.42% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.23% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.10% fail on System
      • 0.052% fail on Pipe
      • 0.031% fail on Tank
    • 0.32% fail on Doors
      • 0.22% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.20% fail on Door condition
        • 0.021% fail on Catch
      • 0.052% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.052% fail on Door condition
      • 0.052% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.042% fail on Door condition
        • 0.010% fail on Catch
    • 0.21% fail on Spare wheel (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Carrier (190% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.010% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.20% fail on Body (54% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Other body component
      • 0.021% fail on Panel
    • 0.14% fail on Seats
      • 0.083% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.062% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.10% fail on Undertray
    • 0.062% fail on Bumpers (65% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.031% fail on Integral vehicle structure (85% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.031% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (85% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.031% fail on Chassis (76% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.021% fail on Chassis condition (84% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.010% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.021% fail on Passenger compartment (8 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.010% fail on Towbar
      • 0.010% fail on Coupling
    • 0.010% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.010% fail on Engine mounting condition
  • 7.6% fail on Brakes (43% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Mechanical brake components (18% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.1% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.1% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.010% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.95% fail on Brake discs and drums (38% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.95% fail on Brake discs (37% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.010% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.20% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (52% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.18% fail on Cable
        • 0.010% fail on Linkage
        • 0.010% fail on Relay lever
    • 2.3% fail on Brake performance (65% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.29% fail on Service brake imbalance (44% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.010% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.010% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.52% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (88% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.51% fail on Rbt (sp) (88% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.010% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.44% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (43% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.44% fail on Rbt (sp) (41% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.28% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.22% fail on Service brake performance (52% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Parking brake performance (84% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.27% fail on Rbt (84% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.24% fail on Parking brake performance (83% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.021% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (87% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.010% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.042% fail on Brake performance not tested (75% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.77% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.73% fail on Pedal (38% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.042% fail on Hand lever (73% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.65% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.64% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.010% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.42% fail on Load sensing valves (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.29% fail on Hydraulic systems (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Brake fluid (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.073% fail on Reservoirs (190% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.021% fail on Valves
    • 0.23% fail on Rigid brake pipes (93% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.15% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.11% fail on Parking brake control (78% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Lever (78% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.083% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.042% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.042% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.010% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.010% fail on Valves
    • 0.010% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.010% fail on Other components
  • 7.5% fail on Visibility
    • 4.2% fail on Washers (17% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Wipers (24% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.51% fail on View to rear (36% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.50% fail on Mirrors (37% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.010% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.43% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.41% fail on Windscreen
      • 0.021% fail on Window
    • 0.11% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.073% fail on Bonnet
  • 7.4% fail on Tyres (24% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.5% fail on Tread depth (45% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.19% fail on Size/type
  • 7.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (23% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 6.7% fail on Exhaust emissions (23% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 6.2% fail on Compression ignition (40% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 5.1% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.76% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (62% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.24% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.17% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.042% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.010% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 0.50% fail on Spark ignition (52% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.42% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (57% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.042% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.031% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.021% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.010% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.010% fail on NOx sensor
    • 0.62% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.59% fail on Engine oil leaks (46% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.021% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.010% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
    • 0.021% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.010% fail on Sound deadening material
      • 0.010% fail on Undertray
  • 3.0% fail on Steering (37% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Steering linkage components (37% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Track rod end (37% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.021% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.010% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.010% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.37% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.33% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.052% fail on Operation
    • 0.15% fail on Power steering (63% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.073% fail on Other components
      • 0.031% fail on Operation (74% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.021% fail on Pipes and hoses (87% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.010% fail on Pump
      • 0.010% fail on Rams
    • 0.042% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.031% fail on Steering play (80% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.031% fail on Steering rack (79% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.010% fail on Steering column
    • 0.010% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.010% fail on Universal joint
  • 2.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.8% fail on Seat belts (66% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Condition (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Requirements (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.042% fail on Prescribed areas (87% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.010% fail on Pre-tensioners
    • 0.29% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (61% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.021% fail on Airbags
      • 0.021% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.42% fail on Identification of the vehicle (38% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.41% fail on Registration plates (39% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.010% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.16% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.083% fail on Condition
    • 0.073% fail on Attachment (60% better than other 2010 vans)
  • 0.021% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.010% fail on Anchorages
    • 0.010% fail on Belt(s)/padding
  • 0.010% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.010% fail on Speed limiter
      • 0.010% fail on Speed limiter