Citroen Berlingo MOT Results
Registered in 201057.8% pass rate
from 8,697 tests in 2017
(4.3% worse than other 2010 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Berlingo is unusually good or bad.
-
28% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(17% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 13% fail on Registration plate lamp (29% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 9.5% fail on Stop lamp (55% worse than other 2010 vans)
-
8.6% fail on
Position lamps
(22% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 7.7% fail on Front lamps (38% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Rear lamps (38% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.034% fail on All position lamps (76% better than other 2010 vans)
- 5.0% fail on Headlamp aim
-
3.3% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.3% fail on Headlamp
-
0.011% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.011% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
-
1.9% fail on
Direction indicators
(31% better than other 2010 vans)
-
1.9% fail on
Flashing type
(31% better than other 2010 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.25% fail on Side repeaters (68% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.24% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.011% fail on Switch
-
1.9% fail on
Flashing type
(31% better than other 2010 vans)
- 1.8% fail on Horn (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
-
0.79% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(55% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.76% fail on Fog lamp (57% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.10% fail on Tell tale
- 0.046% fail on Switch
- 0.15% fail on Battery
- 0.15% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
0.14% fail on
Hazard warning
(54% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.080% fail on Switch (63% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.057% fail on Lamp
- 0.069% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.023% fail on Trailer electrical socket (82% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.023% fail on Rear reflectors (92% better than other 2010 vans)
-
12% fail on
Suspension
(10% better than other 2010 vans)
-
4.6% fail on
Coil springs
(100% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 4.5% fail on Condition (100% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.092% fail on Location
-
4.3% fail on
Drive shafts
(53% worse than other 2010 vans)
-
4.3% fail on
Front drive shafts
(55% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 4.3% fail on Constant velocity joints (56% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.011% fail on Couplings
- 0.011% fail on Drive shafts
-
0.023% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.023% fail on Drive shafts
-
4.3% fail on
Front drive shafts
(55% worse than other 2010 vans)
-
2.5% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(41% better than other 2010 vans)
- 2.0% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (31% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.52% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (55% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.057% fail on Linkage condition (83% better than other 2010 vans)
-
1.3% fail on
Suspension arms
(40% better than other 2010 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (39% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.011% fail on Attachment
- 0.68% fail on Front suspension joints (30% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.22% fail on
Macpherson strut
(44% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.22% fail on Condition (44% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.20% fail on
Wheel bearings
(82% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.11% fail on Front (87% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.080% fail on Rear (67% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.10% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.10% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.10% fail on
Shock absorbers
(91% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.10% fail on Condition (91% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.092% fail on
Radius arms
(2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.080% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.011% fail on Attachment
- 0.023% fail on General condition
-
0.023% fail on
Bonded suspension
- 0.023% fail on Condition
-
0.023% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.023% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.011% fail on
Torque/reaction arms
- 0.011% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.011% fail on
Axles
- 0.011% fail on Swivel joints/housing
- 0.011% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
-
4.6% fail on
Coil springs
(100% worse than other 2010 vans)
-
7.7% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 4.0% fail on Washers (29% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 3.0% fail on Wipers (26% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.93% fail on Windscreen
- 0.46% fail on Mirrors (40% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.034% fail on Bonnet
-
7.7% fail on
Brakes
(35% better than other 2010 vans)
-
4.0% fail on
Hub components
- 3.7% fail on Brake pads
- 0.57% fail on Brake discs (46% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.023% fail on Brake calipers (86% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.011% fail on Brake linings
- 0.011% fail on Wheel cylinder
-
2.0% fail on
Brake performance
(62% better than other 2010 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Rear wheels (49% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.60% fail on Front wheels (36% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.34% fail on Parking brake performance (90% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.14% fail on Service brake performance (59% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Brake imbalance (64% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.023% fail on Brake operation
- 0.011% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
1.0% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(64% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.92% fail on
Components
(64% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.39% fail on Valves (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.30% fail on Hoses
- 0.17% fail on Pipes (92% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.092% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.011% fail on Cylinders
- 0.057% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.046% fail on Leaks
- 0.011% fail on Operation
-
0.92% fail on
Components
(64% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.80% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.80% fail on
Pedal
- 0.79% fail on Anti-slip (37% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.011% fail on Condition
-
0.80% fail on
Pedal
- 0.62% fail on ABS
-
0.10% fail on
Parking brake
(88% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.10% fail on Condition (88% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.10% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.092% fail on Cable
- 0.011% fail on Lever
- 0.057% fail on Restricted movement
- 0.011% fail on Additional braking devices
-
4.0% fail on
Hub components
-
7.1% fail on
Tyres
(14% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 4.8% fail on Tread depth (32% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 2.6% fail on Condition
- 0.17% fail on Size/type
- 0.10% fail on Valve stem
-
1.8% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(40% worse than other 2010 vans)
-
1.5% fail on
Seat belts
(120% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Condition (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.17% fail on Requirements (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.046% fail on Attachment
-
0.011% fail on
Installation check
- 0.011% fail on Anchorage's
- 0.011% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.29% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(53% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.29% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (50% better than other 2010 vans)
-
1.5% fail on
Seat belts
(120% worse than other 2010 vans)
-
1.6% fail on
Steering
(56% better than other 2010 vans)
-
1.4% fail on
Steering system
(57% better than other 2010 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Track rod end (58% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.14% fail on Steering rack
- 0.11% fail on Ball joint
-
0.034% fail on
Free play
- 0.034% fail on Steering rack
- 0.023% fail on Drag link end
- 0.011% fail on Steering arm
-
0.20% fail on
Power steering
(53% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.16% fail on Other components
- 0.034% fail on Pipes and hoses (77% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.011% fail on Pump
- 0.011% fail on Rams
-
0.069% fail on
Steering control
- 0.023% fail on Steering column
-
0.023% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.023% fail on Universal joint
- 0.011% fail on Steering lock
- 0.011% fail on Steering wheel
- 0.034% fail on Steering operation
- 0.011% fail on Locking devices
-
1.4% fail on
Steering system
(57% better than other 2010 vans)
-
1.2% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(28% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.59% fail on Exhaust system (35% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.32% fail on
Fuel system
(51% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.20% fail on Cap
- 0.080% fail on System (62% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.023% fail on Tank (79% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.023% fail on Pipe
- 0.22% fail on Emissions (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.11% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.98% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 0.30% fail on Body condition
-
0.26% fail on
Doors
- 0.13% fail on Passengers other
- 0.10% fail on Drivers
- 0.046% fail on Passengers front
-
0.21% fail on
Seats
- 0.13% fail on Passengers (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.080% fail on Drivers
- 0.14% fail on Spare wheel (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
-
0.034% fail on
Load security
- 0.011% fail on Bootlid
- 0.011% fail on Tailgate
- 0.011% fail on Loading door
- 0.023% fail on Engine mountings
- 0.023% fail on Body security
- 0.011% fail on Speedometer
-
0.49% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
(39% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.49% fail on Registration plate (39% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.20% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.10% fail on Attachment
- 0.092% fail on Condition
-
0.011% fail on
Towbars
- 0.011% fail on Towbar