Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Citroen C15 MOT Results

Registered in 1995
56.0% pass rate
from 109 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen C15 is unusually good or bad.

  • 27% fail on Suspension
    • 16% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 12% fail on Component mounting
      • 3.7% fail on Subframe mounting
      • 0.92% fail on Spring mounting
    • 7.3% fail on Drive shafts (180% worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 7.3% fail on Front drive shafts (200% worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 7.3% fail on Constant velocity joints (200% worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.8% fail on Coil springs
      • 1.8% fail on Condition
    • 1.8% fail on Sub-frames (15 times worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Condition (17 times worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 0.92% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.92% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.92% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.92% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.92% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.92% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.92% fail on Condition
  • 23% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 11% fail on Direction indicators (2 times worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 11% fail on Flashing type (2 times worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 9.2% fail on Side repeaters (6 times worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 1.8% fail on Individual lamps
    • 7.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.7% fail on Front lamps
      • 3.7% fail on Rear lamps
    • 5.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.6% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.7% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 2.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 2.8% fail on Fog lamp
    • 1.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.8% fail on Horn
    • 0.92% fail on Battery
    • 0.92% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.92% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 18% fail on Brakes
    • 16% fail on Brake performance
      • 7.3% fail on Front wheels
      • 4.6% fail on Brake imbalance (3 times worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 4.6% fail on Service brake performance
      • 3.7% fail on Rear wheels
      • 2.8% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.92% fail on Brake operation
    • 1.8% fail on Mechanical components
      • 1.8% fail on Cable (5 times worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 1.8% fail on Components
        • 1.8% fail on Valves
    • 1.8% fail on Hub components
      • 0.92% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.92% fail on Brake calipers
    • 0.92% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.92% fail on Condition
    • 0.92% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.92% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.92% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
  • 8.3% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.5% fail on Wipers
    • 4.6% fail on Washers
  • 6.4% fail on Tyres
    • 3.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.8% fail on Condition
  • 6.4% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 3.7% fail on Body condition
    • 2.8% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 2.8% fail on Chassis
  • 5.5% fail on Steering
    • 5.5% fail on Steering system
      • 3.7% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.92% fail on Free play
        • 0.92% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.92% fail on Steering rack
  • 3.7% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 3.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.7% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 2.8% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 2.8% fail on Exhaust system
  • 0.92% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.92% fail on Registration plate