Citroen C15 MOT Results

Registered in 1995
57.3% pass rate
from 117 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen C15 is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 13% fail on Direction indicators (2 times worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 13% fail on Flashing type (2 times worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 12% fail on Side repeaters (8 times worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 0.85% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 12% fail on Headlamps (150% worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 12% fail on Headlamp (170% worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 7.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 6.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.85% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 6.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.0% fail on Position lamp
    • 5.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.6% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.7% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.85% fail on Horn
    • 1.7% fail on Hazard warning
      • 1.7% fail on Switch
    • 1.7% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.85% fail on Switch
  • 17% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 6.8% fail on Transmission
      • 6.8% fail on Drive shafts (190% worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 6.8% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 5.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 4.3% fail on Chassis
      • 4.3% fail on Chassis condition
    • 3.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 3.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.85% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.85% fail on System
    • 0.85% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.85% fail on Bracket
    • 0.85% fail on Body
      • 0.85% fail on Body condition
    • 0.85% fail on Doors
      • 0.85% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.85% fail on Door condition
    • 0.85% fail on Cabs
      • 0.85% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 16% fail on Brakes
    • 14% fail on Brake performance
      • 10% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 10% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 6.8% fail on Service brake performance
          • 6.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 8.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 7.7% fail on Rbt
          • 6.8% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.85% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.85% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.85% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.85% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.85% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.85% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 2.6% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 2.6% fail on Pedal (4 times worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.7% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.85% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.85% fail on Lever
    • 0.85% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.85% fail on Master cylinder
    • 0.85% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.85% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.85% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
  • 11% fail on Suspension
    • 6.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.85% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.85% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.7% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.7% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.85% fail on Wheel bearings
  • 10% fail on Visibility
    • 5.1% fail on Wipers
    • 3.4% fail on Washers
    • 1.7% fail on Bonnet
  • 4.3% fail on Tyres
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.7% fail on Condition
    • 0.85% fail on Size/type
  • 3.4% fail on Steering
    • 1.7% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.7% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.85% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.85% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.85% fail on Power steering
      • 0.85% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 2.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.6% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.6% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 2.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.6% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.7% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.85% fail on Emissions not tested