Citroen C15 MOT Results

Registered in 1996
45.9% pass rate
from 98 tests in 2020
(14% worse than other 1996 vans)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen C15 is unusually good or bad.

  • 34% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (60% worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 12% fail on Direction indicators (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 12% fail on Flashing type (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 9.2% fail on Side repeaters (9 times worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 3.1% fail on Individual direction indicators (61% worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 1.0% fail on All direction indicators
    • 10% fail on Headlamps (120% worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 10% fail on Headlamp (130% worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 8.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 7.1% fail on Headlamp aim (66% worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 7.1% fail on Headlamp aim (81% worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 7.1% fail on Electrical equipment (55% worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 6.1% fail on Battery(ies) (3 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 1.0% fail on Horn
    • 4.1% fail on Stop lamp (7.3% worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (63% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (63% better than other 1996 vans)
        • 2.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (63% better than other 1996 vans)
  • 28% fail on Brakes (64% worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 21% fail on Brake performance (88% worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 12% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (120% worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 12% fail on Rbt (sp) (130% worse than other 1996 vans)
          • 6.1% fail on Service brake performance (120% worse than other 1996 vans)
          • 6.1% fail on Service brake imbalance (93% worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 8.2% fail on Service brake performance (53% worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 8.2% fail on Rbt (56% worse than other 1996 vans)
          • 6.1% fail on Service brake performance (45% worse than other 1996 vans)
          • 3.1% fail on Service brake imbalance (120% worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 5.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (37% worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 5.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (48% worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Brake performance not tested (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Parking brake performance (39% worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 2.0% fail on Rbt (46% worse than other 1996 vans)
          • 2.0% fail on Parking brake performance (66% worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (3 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 3.1% fail on Pedal (5 times worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes (9.6% better than other 1996 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Load sensing valves (85% worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Mechanical brake components (28% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Brake discs and drums (97% worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 2.0% fail on Brake discs (120% worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 1.0% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 1.0% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 1.0% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
  • 26% fail on Suspension (36% worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 15% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (57% worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 7.1% fail on Suspension arms (95% worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 4.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover (170% worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 3.1% fail on Pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Ball joint
    • 3.1% fail on Springs (68% worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (140% worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Coil springs
        • 1.0% fail on Coil spring
    • 3.1% fail on Shock absorbers (140% worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Sub-frames (200% worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (110% worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Sub-frame
    • 3.1% fail on Other suspension component (3 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.0% fail on Wheel bearings (45% worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.0% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 19% fail on Body, chassis, structure (29% worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 8.2% fail on Chassis (150% worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 8.2% fail on Chassis condition (150% worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 6.1% fail on Exhaust system (40% worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure (12% worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 4.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (13% worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Transmission (32% worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 4.1% fail on Drive shafts (93% worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 4.1% fail on Joints (96% worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Body
      • 1.0% fail on Panel
  • 9.2% fail on Steering (62% worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Steering gear (92% worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 4.1% fail on Steering rack (100% worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Power steering (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Operation (4 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 2.0% fail on Steering linkage components (19% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.0% fail on Track rod end
    • 1.0% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 1.0% fail on Steering play
      • 1.0% fail on Steering rack
  • 7.1% fail on Visibility (22% better than other 1996 vans)
    • 5.1% fail on Wipers (0.78% worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Washers (22% better than other 1996 vans)
  • 6.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (45% worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 6.1% fail on Seat belts (49% worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 6.1% fail on Prescribed areas (88% worse than other 1996 vans)
  • 2.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (51% better than other 1996 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Exhaust emissions (39% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Compression ignition (13% worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 2.0% fail on Emissions not tested (170% worse than other 1996 vans)
  • 2.0% fail on Tyres (47% better than other 1996 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Condition
    • 1.0% fail on Tread depth