Citroen C15 MOT Results
Registered in 199650.4% pass rate
from 119 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen C15 is unusually good or bad.
-
34% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 14% fail on Headlamp aim (120% worse than other 1996 vans)
-
13% fail on
Headlamps
(190% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 12% fail on Headlamp (180% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 0.84% fail on Switch
-
11% fail on
Direction indicators
(2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
-
11% fail on
Flashing type
(2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
- 9.2% fail on Side repeaters (8 times worse than other 1996 vans)
- 0.84% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.84% fail on Individual lamps
-
11% fail on
Flashing type
(2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
- 5.0% fail on Battery
-
4.2% fail on
Position lamps
- 3.4% fail on Front lamps
- 1.7% fail on Rear lamps
-
2.5% fail on
Hazard warning
- 1.7% fail on Lamp
- 0.84% fail on Switch
- 1.7% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 1.7% fail on Stop lamp
- 1.7% fail on Horn
- 0.84% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.84% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.84% fail on Fog lamp
-
24% fail on
Suspension
-
13% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 9.2% fail on Component mounting
- 5.0% fail on Subframe mounting
- 0.84% fail on Spring mounting
-
5.0% fail on
Drive shafts
-
5.0% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 5.0% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
5.0% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
3.4% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
2.5% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.84% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.84% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.84% fail on Attachment
-
2.5% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 1.7% fail on Front
- 0.84% fail on Rear
-
2.5% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 2.5% fail on Condition
-
1.7% fail on
Radius arms
(41 times worse than other 1996 vans)
- 1.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (52 times worse than other 1996 vans)
-
0.84% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.84% fail on Condition
-
0.84% fail on
Torque/reaction arms
- 0.84% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.84% fail on
Axles
- 0.84% fail on Swivel joints/housing
- 0.84% fail on Front suspension joints
-
13% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
23% fail on
Brakes
-
16% fail on
Brake performance
- 7.6% fail on Service brake performance (150% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 5.9% fail on Front wheels
- 4.2% fail on Parking brake performance
- 2.5% fail on Brake imbalance
- 1.7% fail on Rear wheels
- 0.84% fail on Brake operation
-
5.9% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
5.0% fail on
Components
- 3.4% fail on Valves
- 1.7% fail on Hoses
- 0.84% fail on Pipes
- 0.84% fail on Servos
- 0.84% fail on Leaks
-
5.0% fail on
Components
-
3.4% fail on
Prescribed areas
(14 times worse than other 1996 vans)
- 2.5% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (39 times worse than other 1996 vans)
- 1.7% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings (14 times worse than other 1996 vans)
- 0.84% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
-
2.5% fail on
Hub components
- 0.84% fail on Brake pads
- 0.84% fail on Brake discs
- 0.84% fail on Brake calipers
-
0.84% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.84% fail on
Pedal
- 0.84% fail on Condition
-
0.84% fail on
Pedal
- 0.84% fail on Restricted movement
-
16% fail on
Brake performance
-
10% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 5.9% fail on Washers
- 3.4% fail on Wipers
- 0.84% fail on Windscreen
- 0.84% fail on Mirrors
-
9.2% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 5.0% fail on Body condition
-
0.84% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.84% fail on Chassis
- 0.84% fail on Body security
-
0.84% fail on
Doors
- 0.84% fail on Drivers
-
0.84% fail on
Seats
- 0.84% fail on Drivers
- 0.84% fail on Spare wheel
-
7.6% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
7.6% fail on
Seat belts
- 7.6% fail on Prescribed areas
-
7.6% fail on
Seat belts
-
6.7% fail on
Tyres
- 5.0% fail on Condition
- 0.84% fail on Size/type
- 0.84% fail on Tread depth
-
6.7% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 5.9% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.7% fail on
Fuel system
- 1.7% fail on Pipe (6 times worse than other 1996 vans)
- 0.84% fail on Emissions
-
4.2% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
(2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
- 4.2% fail on Registration plate (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
-
2.5% fail on
Steering
-
2.5% fail on
Steering system
- 2.5% fail on Steering rack
-
2.5% fail on
Steering system