Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Citroen C15 MOT Results

Registered in 1996
48.6% pass rate
from 105 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen C15 is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Brakes
    • 18% fail on Brake performance
      • 13% fail on Service brake performance (130% worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 13% fail on Rbt (130% worse than other 1996 vans)
          • 10% fail on Service brake performance (120% worse than other 1996 vans)
          • 4.8% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 10% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 10% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 6.7% fail on Service brake performance
          • 4.8% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 4.8% fail on Hydraulic systems (6 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.95% fail on Servos
      • 0.95% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.95% fail on Valves
    • 3.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.9% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 2.9% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.95% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.95% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.9% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.95% fail on Pedal
      • 0.95% fail on Hand lever
    • 1.9% fail on Air and vacuum systems (13 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.95% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
      • 0.95% fail on Servos
    • 1.9% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 1.9% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.95% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.95% fail on Lever
  • 24% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 11% fail on Headlamp aim (140% worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 10% fail on Headlamp aim (130% worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.95% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 9.5% fail on Direction indicators (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 9.5% fail on Flashing type (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 8.6% fail on Side repeaters (7 times worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 0.95% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 8.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 8.6% fail on Headlamp
    • 4.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.9% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.9% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.9% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.95% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.95% fail on Horn
    • 0.95% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.95% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.95% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.95% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 22% fail on Suspension
    • 12% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 6.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.8% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 2.9% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Ball joint
    • 2.9% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 2.9% fail on Sub-frames
      • 2.9% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.9% fail on Springs
      • 1.9% fail on Coil springs
        • 1.9% fail on Coil spring
    • 1.9% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.95% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.95% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.95% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 11% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.9% fail on Chassis
      • 1.9% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.9% fail on Transmission
      • 1.9% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.9% fail on Joints
    • 0.95% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.95% fail on Pipe
    • 0.95% fail on Seats
      • 0.95% fail on Driver's seat
  • 9.5% fail on Visibility
    • 6.7% fail on Wipers
    • 4.8% fail on Washers
    • 0.95% fail on Bonnet
  • 6.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 6.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 6.7% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 4.8% fail on Tyres
    • 2.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.9% fail on Condition
  • 3.8% fail on Steering
    • 2.9% fail on Steering gear
      • 2.9% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.95% fail on Power steering
      • 0.95% fail on Other components
    • 0.95% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.95% fail on Universal joint
  • 1.9% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.9% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.95% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 0.95% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.95% fail on Other leaks