Citroen C15 MOT Results

Registered in 1996
50.4% pass rate
from 119 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen C15 is unusually good or bad.

  • 34% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 14% fail on Headlamp aim (120% worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 13% fail on Headlamps (190% worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 12% fail on Headlamp (180% worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.84% fail on Switch
    • 11% fail on Direction indicators (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 11% fail on Flashing type (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 9.2% fail on Side repeaters (8 times worse than other 1996 vans)
        • 0.84% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.84% fail on Individual lamps
    • 5.0% fail on Battery
    • 4.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.4% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.7% fail on Rear lamps
    • 2.5% fail on Hazard warning
      • 1.7% fail on Lamp
      • 0.84% fail on Switch
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 1.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.7% fail on Horn
    • 0.84% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.84% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.84% fail on Fog lamp
  • 24% fail on Suspension
    • 13% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 9.2% fail on Component mounting
      • 5.0% fail on Subframe mounting
      • 0.84% fail on Spring mounting
    • 5.0% fail on Drive shafts
      • 5.0% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 5.0% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 3.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 2.5% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.84% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.84% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.84% fail on Attachment
    • 2.5% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.7% fail on Front
      • 0.84% fail on Rear
    • 2.5% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.5% fail on Condition
    • 1.7% fail on Radius arms (41 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (52 times worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 0.84% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.84% fail on Condition
    • 0.84% fail on Torque/reaction arms
      • 0.84% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.84% fail on Axles
      • 0.84% fail on Swivel joints/housing
    • 0.84% fail on Front suspension joints
  • 23% fail on Brakes
    • 16% fail on Brake performance
      • 7.6% fail on Service brake performance (150% worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 5.9% fail on Front wheels
      • 4.2% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.5% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 1.7% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.84% fail on Brake operation
    • 5.9% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 5.0% fail on Components
        • 3.4% fail on Valves
        • 1.7% fail on Hoses
        • 0.84% fail on Pipes
        • 0.84% fail on Servos
      • 0.84% fail on Leaks
    • 3.4% fail on Prescribed areas (14 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (39 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings (14 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.84% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
    • 2.5% fail on Hub components
      • 0.84% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.84% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.84% fail on Brake calipers
    • 0.84% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.84% fail on Pedal
        • 0.84% fail on Condition
    • 0.84% fail on Restricted movement
  • 10% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.9% fail on Washers
    • 3.4% fail on Wipers
    • 0.84% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.84% fail on Mirrors
  • 9.2% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 5.0% fail on Body condition
    • 0.84% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.84% fail on Chassis
    • 0.84% fail on Body security
    • 0.84% fail on Doors
      • 0.84% fail on Drivers
    • 0.84% fail on Seats
      • 0.84% fail on Drivers
    • 0.84% fail on Spare wheel
  • 7.6% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 7.6% fail on Seat belts
      • 7.6% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 6.7% fail on Tyres
    • 5.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.84% fail on Size/type
    • 0.84% fail on Tread depth
  • 6.7% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 5.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.7% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.7% fail on Pipe (6 times worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 0.84% fail on Emissions
  • 4.2% fail on Registration plates and VIN (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Registration plate (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
  • 2.5% fail on Steering
    • 2.5% fail on Steering system
      • 2.5% fail on Steering rack