Citroen C15 MOT Results

Registered in 2000
42.7% pass rate
from 124 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen C15 is unusually good or bad.

  • 40% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (39% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 17% fail on Headlamp aim (170% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 15% fail on Direction indicators (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 15% fail on Flashing type (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 11% fail on Side repeaters (11 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 4.8% fail on Individual lamps
    • 15% fail on Headlamps (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 15% fail on Headlamp (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 7.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.0% fail on Front lamps
      • 3.2% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.81% fail on All position lamps
    • 7.3% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 5.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.8% fail on Battery
    • 3.2% fail on Hazard warning (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Lamp
      • 1.6% fail on Switch (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.81% fail on Tell tale
    • 2.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 2.4% fail on Fog lamp
    • 1.6% fail on Horn
    • 0.81% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 28% fail on Suspension
    • 14% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 9.7% fail on Component mounting
      • 3.2% fail on Subframe mounting
      • 1.6% fail on Spring mounting
    • 10% fail on Drive shafts (190% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 9.7% fail on Front drive shafts (180% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 9.7% fail on Constant velocity joints (180% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.81% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.81% fail on Drive shafts
    • 4.0% fail on Coil springs (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 4.0% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.81% fail on Attachment
    • 1.6% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.6% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.81% fail on Front
      • 0.81% fail on Rear
    • 1.6% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.81% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.81% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.81% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.81% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.81% fail on Front suspension joints
  • 26% fail on Brakes
    • 17% fail on Brake performance
      • 8.9% fail on Front wheels
      • 6.5% fail on Rear wheels
      • 6.5% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.4% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.81% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 8.9% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 7.3% fail on Components
        • 4.0% fail on Valves
        • 2.4% fail on Pipes
        • 0.81% fail on Hoses
      • 1.6% fail on Leaks
    • 2.4% fail on Service brake control components
      • 2.4% fail on Pedal
        • 2.4% fail on Anti-slip (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.6% fail on Condition
    • 1.6% fail on Hub components
      • 0.81% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.81% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.6% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.81% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
      • 0.81% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
    • 0.81% fail on ABS
  • 12% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 8.9% fail on Wipers
    • 4.0% fail on Washers
    • 0.81% fail on Windscreen
  • 8.1% fail on Steering
    • 8.1% fail on Steering system
      • 4.8% fail on Steering rack
      • 2.4% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.81% fail on Free play
        • 0.81% fail on Steering rack
  • 7.3% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 5.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.6% fail on Emissions
  • 6.5% fail on Tyres
    • 4.0% fail on Condition
    • 1.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.81% fail on Size/type
  • 5.6% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 3.2% fail on Body condition
    • 2.4% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 2.4% fail on Chassis
    • 0.81% fail on Doors
      • 0.81% fail on Drivers
  • 4.0% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 3.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.2% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.81% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.81% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 1.6% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.81% fail on Towbars
    • 0.81% fail on Vehicle structure
  • 0.81% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.81% fail on Attachment