Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Citroen C15 MOT Results

Registered in 2000
45.4% pass rate
from 97 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen C15 is unusually good or bad.

  • 30% fail on Brakes (64% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 22% fail on Brake performance (89% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 13% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (150% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 13% fail on Rbt (sp) (150% worse than other 2000 vans)
          • 8.2% fail on Service brake performance
          • 7.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 8.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 8.2% fail on Rbt
          • 7.2% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 4.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 4.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 1.0% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.0% fail on Rbt
          • 1.0% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 5.2% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 3.1% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 3.1% fail on Pedal (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (7 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 3.1% fail on Prescribed areas (8 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 2.1% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings (17 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.0% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
    • 3.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.1% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.1% fail on Brake pads
        • 1.0% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.0% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.0% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.0% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 1.0% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
    • 1.0% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 1.0% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 30% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 14% fail on Headlamps (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 14% fail on Headlamp (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 13% fail on Direction indicators (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 13% fail on Flashing type (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 7.2% fail on Side repeaters (7 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 5.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.0% fail on All direction indicators
    • 7.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 7.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 6.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 4.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.1% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 4.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 4.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 3.1% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 2.1% fail on Horn
      • 1.0% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 2.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.1% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.0% fail on Hazard warning
      • 1.0% fail on Switch
  • 29% fail on Suspension
    • 19% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (100% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 8.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.1% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 3.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 1.0% fail on Ball joint
    • 5.2% fail on Sub-frames (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 3.1% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 1.0% fail on Sub-frame
      • 1.0% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 4.1% fail on Springs
      • 3.1% fail on Coil springs
        • 3.1% fail on Coil spring
      • 1.0% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.1% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 18% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 6.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 5.2% fail on Transmission
      • 5.2% fail on Drive shafts
        • 5.2% fail on Joints
    • 5.2% fail on Body (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 4.1% fail on Panel (7 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Body condition
    • 4.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 3.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 1.0% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 1.0% fail on Chassis
      • 1.0% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.0% fail on Towbar
      • 1.0% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 1.0% fail on Floor
    • 1.0% fail on Seats
      • 1.0% fail on Driver's seat
  • 11% fail on Steering
    • 7.2% fail on Steering gear (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 6.2% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Operation
    • 2.1% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.1% fail on Track rod end
    • 1.0% fail on Power steering
      • 1.0% fail on Operation
    • 1.0% fail on Steering wheel
  • 11% fail on Visibility
    • 6.2% fail on Washers
    • 5.2% fail on Wipers
    • 1.0% fail on View to rear
      • 1.0% fail on Mirrors
  • 6.2% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 6.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 6.2% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 5.2% fail on Tyres
    • 3.1% fail on Condition
    • 2.1% fail on Tread depth
  • 1.0% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.0% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 1.0% fail on Anchorages