MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Citroen » C15 » 2002
Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Citroen C15 MOT Results

Registered in 2002
50.3% pass rate
from 173 tests in 2020
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen C15 is unusually good or bad.

  • 29% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 11% fail on Headlamp aim (120% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 10% fail on Headlamp aim (120% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 10% fail on Direction indicators (180% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 10% fail on Flashing type (180% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 8.7% fail on Side repeaters (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 2.9% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 5.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.8% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.58% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 5.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 5.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 5.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 4.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.6% fail on Position lamp
    • 4.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.7% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.2% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.58% fail on Horn
    • 0.58% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.58% fail on Switch
  • 24% fail on Suspension
    • 18% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (140% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.0% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.58% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 3.5% fail on Springs
      • 2.9% fail on Coil springs
        • 2.9% fail on Coil spring
      • 0.58% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.3% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.2% fail on Sub-frame (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.2% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 0.58% fail on Axles
      • 0.58% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.58% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 23% fail on Brakes
    • 13% fail on Brake performance
      • 9.8% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 9.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 5.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 4.6% fail on Service brake performance
      • 7.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 7.5% fail on Rbt
          • 6.4% fail on Service brake performance
          • 2.9% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt
          • 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (81% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (80% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 4.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.7% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.2% fail on Brake discs
      • 1.2% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 1.2% fail on Cable
    • 3.5% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.5% fail on Pedal (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.7% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 1.7% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (27 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.58% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
        • 0.58% fail on Other braking system component
    • 1.2% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 1.2% fail on Valves (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.58% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.58% fail on Servos
    • 0.58% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.58% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 17% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 8.1% fail on Transmission
      • 7.5% fail on Drive shafts
        • 7.5% fail on Joints
      • 0.58% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.58% fail on Joints
    • 5.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.7% fail on Towbar (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Vehicle structure (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Body
      • 1.2% fail on Other body component
      • 0.58% fail on Panel
    • 1.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.58% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.58% fail on Hose
    • 0.58% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.58% fail on Seats
      • 0.58% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.58% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 8.1% fail on Visibility
    • 4.6% fail on Washers
    • 4.0% fail on Wipers
    • 0.58% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.58% fail on Windscreen
  • 5.8% fail on Tyres
    • 3.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.7% fail on Condition
    • 0.58% fail on Size/type
  • 4.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 4.6% fail on Seat belts
      • 4.6% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 4.0% fail on Steering
    • 2.9% fail on Steering gear
      • 2.9% fail on Steering rack
    • 1.2% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.2% fail on Track rod end
  • 2.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 1.2% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.2% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.58% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.58% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.2% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.58% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.58% fail on Other leaks
  • 1.7% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plates