Citroen C15 MOT Results
Registered in 200243.4% pass rate
from 265 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen C15 is unusually good or bad.
-
40% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(28% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 14% fail on Headlamp aim (120% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
13% fail on
Headlamps
(2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 12% fail on Headlamp (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.38% fail on Switch
-
11% fail on
Direction indicators
(160% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
11% fail on
Flashing type
(160% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 9.4% fail on Side repeaters (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 1.5% fail on Individual lamps
-
11% fail on
Flashing type
(160% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
9.1% fail on
Position lamps
- 5.3% fail on Front lamps
- 3.8% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.38% fail on All position lamps
- 0.38% fail on Switch
- 6.8% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 6.4% fail on Stop lamp
-
5.3% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 5.3% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.38% fail on Tell tale
- 3.8% fail on Battery (160% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
1.1% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.75% fail on Switch
- 0.38% fail on Lamp
- 0.75% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.38% fail on Horn
-
27% fail on
Suspension
-
12% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 9.4% fail on Component mounting (90% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 1.9% fail on Subframe mounting
- 1.1% fail on Spring mounting
-
8.7% fail on
Drive shafts
(89% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
8.7% fail on
Front drive shafts
(93% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 8.7% fail on Constant velocity joints (95% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
8.7% fail on
Front drive shafts
(93% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
6.4% fail on
Coil springs
(160% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 6.4% fail on Condition (170% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
3.8% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
1.1% fail on
Tie bars/rods
(7 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (7 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
1.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(76% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.75% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.38% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
-
1.1% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.75% fail on Rear
- 0.38% fail on Front
- 1.1% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.75% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.75% fail on Condition
-
0.75% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.75% fail on Condition
-
0.38% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.38% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.38% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.38% fail on Condition
-
12% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
23% fail on
Brakes
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
- 5.7% fail on Front wheels
- 5.7% fail on Rear wheels
- 5.7% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance (71% better than other 2002 vans)
- 1.5% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.38% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
9.8% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
9.4% fail on
Components
- 4.5% fail on Valves
- 3.8% fail on Pipes
- 1.5% fail on Hoses
- 0.38% fail on Cylinders
- 0.38% fail on Leaks
-
9.4% fail on
Components
-
2.6% fail on
Service brake control components
(2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
2.6% fail on
Pedal
(2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 2.3% fail on Anti-slip (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.38% fail on Condition
-
2.6% fail on
Pedal
(2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
2.6% fail on
Hub components
- 1.5% fail on Brake discs
- 1.1% fail on Brake pads
- 0.38% fail on Wheel cylinder
- 1.1% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.75% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.38% fail on Linkage
- 0.38% fail on Cable
-
0.38% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.38% fail on Condition
-
0.38% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
-
0.38% fail on
Components
- 0.38% fail on Servos
-
0.38% fail on
Components
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
-
11% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 5.7% fail on Washers
- 3.4% fail on Wipers
- 1.5% fail on Windscreen
- 1.1% fail on Mirrors
-
9.8% fail on
Tyres
- 6.4% fail on Tread depth
- 3.4% fail on Condition
- 0.38% fail on Size/type
-
4.5% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
4.5% fail on
Seat belts
- 4.5% fail on Prescribed areas
-
4.5% fail on
Seat belts
-
4.5% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 3.0% fail on Body condition
-
1.1% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 1.1% fail on Chassis
-
0.38% fail on
Doors
- 0.38% fail on Drivers
-
4.5% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 3.8% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.75% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.75% fail on Pipe
-
3.4% fail on
Steering
(55% better than other 2002 vans)
-
3.4% fail on
Steering system
- 2.3% fail on Track rod end
- 1.1% fail on Steering rack
-
3.4% fail on
Steering system
-
1.1% fail on
Towbars
- 0.75% fail on Vehicle structure
- 0.38% fail on Towbar
-
1.1% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.1% fail on Registration plate