Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Citroen C15 MOT Results

Registered in 2002
43.4% pass rate
from 265 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen C15 is unusually good or bad.

  • 40% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (28% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 14% fail on Headlamp aim (120% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 13% fail on Headlamps (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 12% fail on Headlamp (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Switch
    • 11% fail on Direction indicators (160% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 11% fail on Flashing type (160% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 9.4% fail on Side repeaters (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Individual lamps
    • 9.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.3% fail on Front lamps
      • 3.8% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.38% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.38% fail on Switch
    • 6.8% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 6.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 5.3% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.38% fail on Tell tale
    • 3.8% fail on Battery (160% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.75% fail on Switch
      • 0.38% fail on Lamp
    • 0.75% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.38% fail on Horn
  • 27% fail on Suspension
    • 12% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 9.4% fail on Component mounting (90% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Subframe mounting
      • 1.1% fail on Spring mounting
    • 8.7% fail on Drive shafts (89% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 8.7% fail on Front drive shafts (93% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 8.7% fail on Constant velocity joints (95% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 6.4% fail on Coil springs (160% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 6.4% fail on Condition (170% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.1% fail on Tie bars/rods (7 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (7 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Anti-roll bars (76% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.75% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.38% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.1% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.75% fail on Rear
      • 0.38% fail on Front
    • 1.1% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.75% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.75% fail on Condition
    • 0.75% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.75% fail on Condition
    • 0.38% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.38% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.38% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.38% fail on Condition
  • 23% fail on Brakes
    • 12% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.7% fail on Front wheels
      • 5.7% fail on Rear wheels
      • 5.7% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance (71% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.38% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 9.8% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 9.4% fail on Components
        • 4.5% fail on Valves
        • 3.8% fail on Pipes
        • 1.5% fail on Hoses
        • 0.38% fail on Cylinders
      • 0.38% fail on Leaks
    • 2.6% fail on Service brake control components (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Pedal (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 2.3% fail on Anti-slip (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.38% fail on Condition
    • 2.6% fail on Hub components
      • 1.5% fail on Brake discs
      • 1.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.38% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 1.1% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.75% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.38% fail on Linkage
      • 0.38% fail on Cable
    • 0.38% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.38% fail on Condition
    • 0.38% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.38% fail on Components
        • 0.38% fail on Servos
  • 11% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.7% fail on Washers
    • 3.4% fail on Wipers
    • 1.5% fail on Windscreen
    • 1.1% fail on Mirrors
  • 9.8% fail on Tyres
    • 6.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.4% fail on Condition
    • 0.38% fail on Size/type
  • 4.5% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 4.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 4.5% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 4.5% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 3.0% fail on Body condition
    • 1.1% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.1% fail on Chassis
    • 0.38% fail on Doors
      • 0.38% fail on Drivers
  • 4.5% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 3.8% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.75% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.75% fail on Pipe
  • 3.4% fail on Steering (55% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Steering system
      • 2.3% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.1% fail on Steering rack
  • 1.1% fail on Towbars
    • 0.75% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.38% fail on Towbar
  • 1.1% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate