Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Citroen C15 MOT Results

Registered in 2003
52.2% pass rate
from 182 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen C15 is unusually good or bad.

  • 36% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 13% fail on Headlamp aim (100% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 12% fail on Headlamps (200% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 12% fail on Headlamp (190% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.55% fail on Switch
    • 8.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 8.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.5% fail on Rear lamps
      • 4.4% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.55% fail on All position lamps
    • 7.7% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 6.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 6.6% fail on Fog lamp
    • 6.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 6.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.8% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 2.7% fail on Individual lamps
        • 1.1% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.7% fail on Battery
    • 0.55% fail on Horn
  • 25% fail on Suspension
    • 13% fail on Drive shafts (160% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 13% fail on Front drive shafts (150% worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 13% fail on Constant velocity joints (160% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.55% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.55% fail on Drive shafts
    • 9.9% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 8.8% fail on Component mounting (110% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Spring mounting
      • 1.1% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 3.3% fail on Coil springs
      • 3.3% fail on Condition
    • 3.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 2.2% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.6% fail on Anti-roll bars (73% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.1% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.1% fail on Front
    • 0.55% fail on Torque/reaction arms
      • 0.55% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.55% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.55% fail on Condition
  • 21% fail on Brakes
    • 15% fail on Brake performance
      • 8.2% fail on Front wheels (98% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 7.7% fail on Rear wheels
      • 6.0% fail on Service brake performance
      • 3.3% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.1% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 8.8% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 8.2% fail on Components
        • 5.5% fail on Valves
        • 2.2% fail on Pipes
        • 1.1% fail on Hoses
        • 0.55% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.55% fail on Operation
    • 3.3% fail on Hub components
      • 2.2% fail on Brake discs
      • 1.1% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.1% fail on Service brake control components
      • 1.1% fail on Pedal
        • 0.55% fail on Condition
        • 0.55% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.55% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.55% fail on Condition
  • 12% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 8.2% fail on Wipers
    • 2.2% fail on Washers
    • 1.1% fail on Bonnet
    • 1.1% fail on Mirrors
  • 7.7% fail on Tyres
    • 4.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.3% fail on Condition
  • 4.9% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 4.9% fail on Exhaust system
  • 4.4% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 4.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 4.4% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 2.7% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 2.2% fail on Body condition
    • 0.55% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.55% fail on Chassis
  • 2.2% fail on Steering (70% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Steering system
      • 1.1% fail on Steering rack
      • 1.1% fail on Track rod end
  • 1.1% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.55% fail on Towbars
    • 0.55% fail on Vehicle structure