Citroen C25 MOT Results

Registered in 1990
59.3% pass rate
from 59 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1990 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen C25 is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 14% fail on Headlamps (190% worse than other 1990 vans)
      • 14% fail on Headlamp (190% worse than other 1990 vans)
    • 8.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 6.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 5.1% fail on Direction indicators
      • 5.1% fail on Flashing type
        • 5.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.7% fail on Switch
    • 3.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 3.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 3.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 3.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.4% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.7% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 1.7% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 1.7% fail on Stop lamp
  • 22% fail on Brakes
    • 14% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 5.1% fail on Rbt
          • 5.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 1.7% fail on Decelerometer
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
      • 6.8% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 6.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 5.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 5.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 5.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 5.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 6.8% fail on Load sensing valves (8 times worse than other 1990 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.7% fail on Pedal
    • 1.7% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 1.7% fail on Servos
    • 1.7% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 1.7% fail on Valves
    • 1.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.7% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 1.7% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 22% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 10% fail on Exhaust system
    • 8.5% fail on Transmission (2 times worse than other 1990 vans)
      • 8.5% fail on Drive shafts (3 times worse than other 1990 vans)
        • 8.5% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 1990 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.7% fail on Chassis
      • 1.7% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.7% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.7% fail on System
    • 1.7% fail on Bumpers
    • 1.7% fail on Body
      • 1.7% fail on Other body component
    • 1.7% fail on Seats
      • 1.7% fail on Driver's seat
  • 14% fail on Suspension
    • 10% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.4% fail on Springs
      • 3.4% fail on Leaf springs
        • 1.7% fail on Leaf spring
        • 1.7% fail on Anchor bracket
    • 1.7% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.7% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 1.7% fail on Pipes
  • 8.5% fail on Visibility
    • 6.8% fail on Wipers
    • 1.7% fail on View to rear
      • 1.7% fail on Mirrors
    • 1.7% fail on Washers
  • 8.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 8.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 6.8% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.7% fail on Condition
  • 1.7% fail on Steering
    • 1.7% fail on Steering column
  • 1.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 1.7% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.7% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.7% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 1.7% fail on Tyres
    • 1.7% fail on Tread depth