MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Citroen » Dispatch » 1997

Citroen Dispatch MOT Results

Registered in 1997
63.8% pass rate
from 80 tests in 2020
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Dispatch is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Brakes
    • 11% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.0% fail on Service brake performance
        • 5.0% fail on Rbt
          • 3.8% fail on Service brake performance
          • 2.5% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 5.0% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 5.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 5.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt
          • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 5.0% fail on Load sensing valves (2 times worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.5% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.5% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 2.5% fail on Brake discs
      • 1.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.3% fail on Brake pads
  • 16% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 6.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 6.3% fail on Transmission
      • 6.3% fail on Drive shafts
        • 6.3% fail on Joints
    • 3.8% fail on Towbar (4 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.3% fail on Other towbar components
    • 1.3% fail on Chassis
      • 1.3% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.3% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.3% fail on Pipe
  • 13% fail on Suspension
    • 6.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.8% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.3% fail on Suspension arm
      • 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 5.0% fail on Sub-frames (3 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 3.8% fail on Sub-frame (31 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.3% fail on Anti-roll bar
    • 1.3% fail on Other suspension component
      • 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 11% fail on Visibility
    • 6.3% fail on Washers
    • 3.8% fail on Wipers
    • 1.3% fail on View to rear
      • 1.3% fail on Mirrors
  • 8.8% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (62% better than other 1997 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.5% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
  • 8.8% fail on Tyres
    • 6.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.8% fail on Condition
  • 7.5% fail on Steering
    • 5.0% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 5.0% fail on Track rod end
    • 1.3% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.3% fail on Steering rack
    • 1.3% fail on Steering play
      • 1.3% fail on Steering rack
  • 3.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.5% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 2.5% fail on Engine oil leaks
    • 1.3% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.3% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 1.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.3% fail on Condition