Citroen Dispatch MOT Results
Registered in 199950.5% pass rate
from 333 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Dispatch is unusually good or bad.
-
26% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 9.3% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
7.8% fail on
Position lamps
- 4.5% fail on Front lamps
- 3.3% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.60% fail on All position lamps
- 5.4% fail on Headlamp aim
- 4.5% fail on Stop lamp
-
4.5% fail on
Direction indicators
-
4.5% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.4% fail on Individual lamps
- 1.5% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.60% fail on Switch (5 times worse than other 1999 vans)
-
4.5% fail on
Flashing type
-
3.6% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.3% fail on Headlamp
- 0.30% fail on Matched pair
- 2.4% fail on Horn
-
1.8% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.8% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.30% fail on Tell tale
- 0.30% fail on Switch
- 1.2% fail on Battery
- 0.60% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.30% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.30% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.30% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.30% fail on Switch
-
25% fail on
Suspension
-
9.6% fail on
Drive shafts
(160% worse than other 1999 vans)
-
9.6% fail on
Front drive shafts
(160% worse than other 1999 vans)
- 9.6% fail on Constant velocity joints (170% worse than other 1999 vans)
-
9.6% fail on
Front drive shafts
(160% worse than other 1999 vans)
-
7.2% fail on
Suspension arms
(100% worse than other 1999 vans)
- 6.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (110% worse than other 1999 vans)
- 0.30% fail on Attachment
-
3.9% fail on
Shock absorbers
(120% worse than other 1999 vans)
- 3.9% fail on Condition (120% worse than other 1999 vans)
- 3.6% fail on Front suspension joints
-
3.6% fail on
Prescribed areas
(67% better than other 1999 vans)
- 1.5% fail on Component mounting (79% better than other 1999 vans)
- 1.5% fail on Subframe mounting
- 0.60% fail on Spring mounting (85% better than other 1999 vans)
-
3.0% fail on
Sub-frames
(12 times worse than other 1999 vans)
- 2.4% fail on Condition (13 times worse than other 1999 vans)
- 0.60% fail on Attachment (11 times worse than other 1999 vans)
- 0.30% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
1.2% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.60% fail on Front
- 0.60% fail on Rear
-
0.90% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.90% fail on Condition
-
0.60% fail on
Trailing arms
(8 times worse than other 1999 vans)
- 0.60% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (9 times worse than other 1999 vans)
-
0.60% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.30% fail on Condition
- 0.30% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.60% fail on
Panhard rods
(48 times worse than other 1999 vans)
- 0.60% fail on Condition (72 times worse than other 1999 vans)
-
0.60% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(81% better than other 1999 vans)
- 0.60% fail on Presence (28 times worse than other 1999 vans)
-
0.30% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.30% fail on Condition
-
0.30% fail on
Axles
- 0.30% fail on Stub axle
-
9.6% fail on
Drive shafts
(160% worse than other 1999 vans)
-
20% fail on
Brakes
-
11% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
9.9% fail on
Components
- 4.5% fail on Hoses
- 3.0% fail on Pipes
- 2.7% fail on Valves
- 0.30% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.30% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.30% fail on Operation
- 0.30% fail on Leaks
-
9.9% fail on
Components
-
9.6% fail on
Brake performance
- 4.8% fail on Rear wheels
- 3.6% fail on Front wheels
- 3.0% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.8% fail on Parking brake performance (63% better than other 1999 vans)
- 1.5% fail on Brake imbalance
-
4.2% fail on
Hub components
- 2.4% fail on Brake pads
- 1.5% fail on Brake discs
- 0.30% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.30% fail on Wheel cylinder
-
0.30% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.30% fail on Condition
-
0.30% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.30% fail on
Pedal
- 0.30% fail on Condition
-
0.30% fail on
Pedal
-
0.30% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.30% fail on Cable
-
0.30% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
-
0.30% fail on
Components
- 0.30% fail on Hoses
-
0.30% fail on
Components
- 0.30% fail on Restricted movement
-
11% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
9.6% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 6.0% fail on Wipers
- 3.3% fail on Washers
- 1.5% fail on Mirrors
-
8.7% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 7.2% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.90% fail on Emissions
-
0.90% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.90% fail on System
- 0.60% fail on Emissions not tested
-
8.4% fail on
Tyres
- 5.4% fail on Tread depth
- 3.6% fail on Condition
- 0.60% fail on Size/type
-
7.2% fail on
Steering
-
6.6% fail on
Steering system
- 3.6% fail on Track rod end
- 2.1% fail on Steering rack
- 0.90% fail on Ball joint
- 0.30% fail on Steering arm
-
0.60% fail on
Power steering
- 0.60% fail on Pipes and hoses
-
6.6% fail on
Steering system
-
5.1% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 2.4% fail on Body condition
-
1.2% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 1.2% fail on Chassis
-
0.90% fail on
Doors
- 0.60% fail on Passengers other
- 0.30% fail on Passengers front
- 0.60% fail on Spare wheel (6 times worse than other 1999 vans)
- 0.30% fail on Body security
-
2.7% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 2.7% fail on Registration plate
-
0.90% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(83% better than other 1999 vans)
-
0.90% fail on
Seat belts
(82% better than other 1999 vans)
- 0.30% fail on Requirements
- 0.30% fail on Attachment
- 0.30% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.90% fail on
Seat belts
(82% better than other 1999 vans)
-
0.60% fail on
Towbars
- 0.60% fail on Vehicle structure