MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Citroen » Dispatch » 1999
Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Citroen Dispatch MOT Results

Registered in 1999
50.5% pass rate
from 333 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Dispatch is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 9.3% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 7.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.5% fail on Front lamps
      • 3.3% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.60% fail on All position lamps
    • 5.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.4% fail on Individual lamps
        • 1.5% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.60% fail on Switch (5 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.3% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.30% fail on Matched pair
    • 2.4% fail on Horn
    • 1.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.8% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.30% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.30% fail on Switch
    • 1.2% fail on Battery
    • 0.60% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.30% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.30% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.30% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.30% fail on Switch
  • 25% fail on Suspension
    • 9.6% fail on Drive shafts (160% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 9.6% fail on Front drive shafts (160% worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 9.6% fail on Constant velocity joints (170% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 7.2% fail on Suspension arms (100% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 6.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (110% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Attachment
    • 3.9% fail on Shock absorbers (120% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 3.9% fail on Condition (120% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 3.6% fail on Prescribed areas (67% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Component mounting (79% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Subframe mounting
      • 0.60% fail on Spring mounting (85% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Sub-frames (12 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Condition (13 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.60% fail on Attachment (11 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.2% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.60% fail on Front
      • 0.60% fail on Rear
    • 0.90% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.90% fail on Condition
    • 0.60% fail on Trailing arms (8 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.60% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (9 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.60% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.30% fail on Condition
      • 0.30% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.60% fail on Panhard rods (48 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.60% fail on Condition (72 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.60% fail on Anti-roll bars (81% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.60% fail on Presence (28 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.30% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.30% fail on Condition
    • 0.30% fail on Axles
      • 0.30% fail on Stub axle
  • 20% fail on Brakes
    • 11% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 9.9% fail on Components
        • 4.5% fail on Hoses
        • 3.0% fail on Pipes
        • 2.7% fail on Valves
        • 0.30% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.30% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.30% fail on Operation
      • 0.30% fail on Leaks
    • 9.6% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.8% fail on Rear wheels
      • 3.6% fail on Front wheels
      • 3.0% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.8% fail on Parking brake performance (63% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 4.2% fail on Hub components
      • 2.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.5% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.30% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.30% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 0.30% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.30% fail on Condition
    • 0.30% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.30% fail on Pedal
        • 0.30% fail on Condition
    • 0.30% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.30% fail on Cable
    • 0.30% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.30% fail on Components
        • 0.30% fail on Hoses
    • 0.30% fail on Restricted movement
  • 9.6% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.0% fail on Wipers
    • 3.3% fail on Washers
    • 1.5% fail on Mirrors
  • 8.7% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 7.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.90% fail on Emissions
    • 0.90% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.90% fail on System
    • 0.60% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 8.4% fail on Tyres
    • 5.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.60% fail on Size/type
  • 7.2% fail on Steering
    • 6.6% fail on Steering system
      • 3.6% fail on Track rod end
      • 2.1% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.90% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.30% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.60% fail on Power steering
      • 0.60% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 5.1% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 2.4% fail on Body condition
    • 1.2% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.2% fail on Chassis
    • 0.90% fail on Doors
      • 0.60% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.30% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.60% fail on Spare wheel (6 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.30% fail on Body security
  • 2.7% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 2.7% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.90% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (83% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.90% fail on Seat belts (82% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Requirements
      • 0.30% fail on Attachment
      • 0.30% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.60% fail on Towbars
    • 0.60% fail on Vehicle structure