Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Citroen Dispatch MOT Results

Registered in 1999
56.9% pass rate
from 218 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Dispatch is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Suspension
    • 7.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.1% fail on Ball joint
      • 2.8% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 1.4% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 5.0% fail on Sub-frames (4 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 3.7% fail on Sub-frame (26 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.92% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.46% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 3.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (59% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.92% fail on Axles (5 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.92% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (27 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.92% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.92% fail on Suspension rods (11 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.92% fail on Suspension rod (27 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.92% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.46% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.46% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.46% fail on Springs
      • 0.46% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.46% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.46% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.46% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.46% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.46% fail on Anti-roll bar
  • 17% fail on Brakes
    • 9.6% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 6.4% fail on Rbt
          • 5.5% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.92% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 6.4% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 6.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 5.5% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.92% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.92% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.46% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.46% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.46% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.46% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.46% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 6.4% fail on Mechanical brake components (140% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 3.7% fail on Brake discs and drums (3 times worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 3.7% fail on Brake discs (3 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 2.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.8% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.46% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.46% fail on Cable
    • 2.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.92% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.46% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.46% fail on Pedal
    • 0.46% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.46% fail on Valves
    • 0.46% fail on Load sensing valves
  • 17% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 6.9% fail on Transmission
      • 6.9% fail on Drive shafts (120% worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 6.9% fail on Joints (130% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 6.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.4% fail on Towbar
      • 1.4% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.92% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.92% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.92% fail on Chassis
      • 0.92% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.92% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.92% fail on System
    • 0.92% fail on Floor
    • 0.46% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.46% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.46% fail on Carrier
  • 15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.7% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.92% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.92% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.4% fail on Side repeaters
    • 2.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.8% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.8% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.8% fail on Horn
      • 0.92% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 2.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.46% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.46% fail on Switch
    • 0.46% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.46% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 9.6% fail on Steering
    • 5.0% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 4.6% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.46% fail on Ball joint
    • 2.8% fail on Steering gear
      • 2.8% fail on Steering rack
    • 1.8% fail on Power steering
      • 0.92% fail on Pipes and hoses (5 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.92% fail on Other components
      • 0.46% fail on Pump
  • 9.6% fail on Visibility
    • 5.0% fail on Wipers
    • 5.0% fail on Washers
    • 0.46% fail on View to rear
      • 0.46% fail on Mirrors
  • 6.9% fail on Tyres
    • 5.5% fail on Tread depth (120% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Condition
  • 2.8% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.92% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.92% fail on Condition
      • 0.46% fail on Requirements
    • 0.46% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 2.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 1.8% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.8% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.92% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.46% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.46% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.46% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.46% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 0.46% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.46% fail on Registration plates