Citroen Dispatch MOT Results

Registered in 2000
43.0% pass rate
from 321 tests in 2020
(20% worse than other 2000 vans)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Dispatch is unusually good or bad.

  • 28% fail on Suspension (42% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 13% fail on Suspension arms (150% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 5.0% fail on Ball joint
      • 4.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover (190% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 3.7% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.31% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 8.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 5.3% fail on Sub-frames (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.8% fail on Sub-frame (15 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (150% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 2.2% fail on Springs
      • 1.2% fail on Coil springs
        • 1.2% fail on Coil spring
      • 0.93% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.9% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.6% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.93% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.62% fail on Pins and bushes (11 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.93% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.93% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.31% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.31% fail on Linkage
      • 0.31% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 0.62% fail on Axles
      • 0.31% fail on Axle
      • 0.31% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.31% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.31% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.31% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.31% fail on Suspension rod
  • 24% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.2% fail on Direction indicators (93% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 6.2% fail on Flashing type (93% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 4.4% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.2% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.62% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.31% fail on Switch
    • 5.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.3% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.31% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 5.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.4% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.62% fail on All position lamps (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.1% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 2.2% fail on Horn
      • 0.93% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.9% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.31% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.31% fail on Switch
  • 20% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 9.3% fail on Exhaust system (120% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 6.2% fail on Transmission
      • 5.6% fail on Drive shafts
        • 5.6% fail on Joints
      • 0.62% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.62% fail on Joints
    • 3.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.62% fail on Sub-frame (8 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.62% fail on Sub-frame condition (9 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Chassis
      • 1.6% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.2% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.62% fail on System
      • 0.31% fail on Tank
      • 0.31% fail on Hose
    • 1.2% fail on Seats
      • 0.93% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.31% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.93% fail on Towbar
      • 0.93% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.31% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.31% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.31% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.31% fail on Doors
      • 0.31% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.31% fail on Door condition
  • 17% fail on Brakes
    • 9.7% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.6% fail on Service brake performance
        • 5.6% fail on Rbt
          • 4.7% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 4.7% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 4.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 3.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.31% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.31% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt
          • 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (73% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (72% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.4% fail on Brake linings and pads (170% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 3.4% fail on Brake pads (170% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.9% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.31% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.31% fail on Cable
    • 2.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.6% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 1.2% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.62% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.62% fail on Valves
    • 0.62% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.31% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.31% fail on Lever
    • 0.31% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.31% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.31% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.31% fail on Additional braking device
  • 12% fail on Visibility
    • 6.5% fail on Wipers
    • 6.2% fail on Washers
    • 0.62% fail on View to rear
      • 0.62% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.31% fail on Driver's view
  • 10% fail on Tyres (100% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 5.6% fail on Tread depth (91% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 5.3% fail on Condition (140% worse than other 2000 vans)
  • 8.4% fail on Steering
    • 5.0% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 4.7% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.31% fail on Steering arm
    • 1.9% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.9% fail on Steering rack
    • 1.6% fail on Power steering
      • 0.62% fail on Operation
      • 0.62% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.31% fail on Other components
    • 0.31% fail on Steering play
      • 0.31% fail on Steering rack
  • 6.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.0% fail on Compression ignition
        • 3.1% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.62% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.62% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.31% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.31% fail on Other emission control equipment
      • 1.9% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (11 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.31% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 1.2% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.93% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.31% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 4.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 4.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.8% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Requirements (9 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.93% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.93% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.31% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.31% fail on Belt(s)/padding