Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Citroen Dispatch MOT Results

Registered in 2000
44.5% pass rate
from 535 tests in 2017
(11% worse than other 2000 vans)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Dispatch is unusually good or bad.

  • 30% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 11% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 9.9% fail on Position lamps
      • 7.1% fail on Front lamps
      • 3.7% fail on Rear lamps
    • 6.4% fail on Headlamps (60% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 6.4% fail on Headlamp (63% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 6.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.2% fail on Individual lamps
        • 1.3% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.37% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.19% fail on Switch
    • 3.2% fail on Horn
    • 1.7% fail on Battery
    • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (61% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Fog lamp (63% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Switch
    • 0.75% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.75% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.56% fail on Lamp
      • 0.19% fail on Switch
    • 0.19% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.19% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.19% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 27% fail on Suspension
    • 12% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 6.5% fail on Component mounting
      • 6.5% fail on Subframe mounting (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.93% fail on Spring mounting (78% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 8.6% fail on Suspension arms (120% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 8.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (140% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 6.0% fail on Drive shafts (68% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 6.0% fail on Front drive shafts (71% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 6.0% fail on Constant velocity joints (73% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Sub-frames (12 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 3.4% fail on Condition (13 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.75% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (17 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Attachment
    • 2.4% fail on Trailing arms (17 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (19 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Attachment
    • 2.2% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.2% fail on Condition
    • 1.7% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.5% fail on Front
      • 0.19% fail on Rear
    • 1.7% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.1% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.93% fail on Condition
      • 0.19% fail on Location
    • 0.75% fail on Panhard rods (20 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.75% fail on Condition (31 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.75% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.75% fail on Condition
    • 0.19% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.19% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.19% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.19% fail on Attachment
    • 0.19% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.19% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 21% fail on Brakes
    • 12% fail on Brake performance
      • 7.5% fail on Front wheels (53% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 4.3% fail on Rear wheels
      • 2.8% fail on Parking brake performance (47% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.3% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.19% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.19% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 11% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 11% fail on Components
        • 4.7% fail on Valves
        • 3.7% fail on Hoses (85% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 3.4% fail on Pipes
        • 0.93% fail on Reservoirs (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.37% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.37% fail on Operation
      • 0.19% fail on Leaks
    • 2.6% fail on Hub components
      • 1.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.56% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.19% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.19% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.19% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 1.7% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.7% fail on Condition
    • 1.1% fail on Service brake control components
      • 1.1% fail on Pedal
        • 0.75% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.37% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.19% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.19% fail on Cable
  • 13% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 8.2% fail on Wipers
    • 4.7% fail on Washers
    • 1.3% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.75% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.37% fail on Bonnet
  • 12% fail on Tyres (64% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 6.9% fail on Tread depth (70% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 5.4% fail on Condition
    • 0.75% fail on Valve stem (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.37% fail on Size/type
  • 10% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 8.6% fail on Exhaust system (52% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.3% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.75% fail on System
      • 0.56% fail on Cap
    • 0.75% fail on Emissions
  • 8.8% fail on Steering
    • 8.0% fail on Steering system
      • 5.2% fail on Track rod end
      • 2.8% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.75% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.56% fail on Free play
        • 0.56% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.56% fail on Steering arm (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Other components
        • 0.19% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 1.3% fail on Power steering
      • 0.56% fail on Operation
      • 0.37% fail on Other components
      • 0.19% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.19% fail on Pump
      • 0.19% fail on Rams
  • 7.5% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 3.4% fail on Body condition
    • 2.8% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 2.8% fail on Chassis
    • 0.75% fail on Doors
      • 0.37% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.37% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.56% fail on Seats
      • 0.56% fail on Drivers
    • 0.37% fail on Load security
      • 0.37% fail on Loading door (6 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.19% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.19% fail on Body security
    • 0.19% fail on Spare wheel
  • 4.1% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 3.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.9% fail on Requirements (8 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
      • 0.37% fail on Attachment
      • 0.37% fail on Prescribed areas (91% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.37% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.37% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 2.2% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 2.2% fail on Registration plate
  • 1.1% fail on Towbars
    • 1.1% fail on Vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
  • 0.56% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.37% fail on Condition
    • 0.19% fail on Attachment