MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Citroen » Dispatch » 2001

Citroen Dispatch MOT Results

Registered in 2001
47.5% pass rate
from 812 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2001 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Dispatch is unusually good or bad.

  • 31% fail on Suspension (30% worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 13% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 8.4% fail on Component mounting
      • 5.3% fail on Subframe mounting (190% worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.49% fail on Spring mounting (89% better than other 2001 vans)
    • 9.5% fail on Suspension arms (120% worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 9.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (110% worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.37% fail on Attachment (3 times worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 8.3% fail on Drive shafts (120% worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 8.1% fail on Front drive shafts (120% worse than other 2001 vans)
        • 8.0% fail on Constant velocity joints (120% worse than other 2001 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.12% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.12% fail on Drive shafts
    • 4.1% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 3.7% fail on Trailing arms (23 times worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 3.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (22 times worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.49% fail on Attachment (39 times worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Sub-frames (13 times worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 2.8% fail on Condition (17 times worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.62% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (14 times worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Attachment
    • 2.2% fail on Coil springs
      • 2.1% fail on Condition
      • 0.12% fail on Location
    • 1.8% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.8% fail on Condition
    • 1.7% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.2% fail on Front
      • 0.49% fail on Rear
    • 1.1% fail on Macpherson strut (3 times worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 0.49% fail on Panhard rods (45 times worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.49% fail on Condition (55 times worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 0.25% fail on Torsion bars (13 times worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Condition (27 times worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 0.25% fail on Anti-roll bars (93% better than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Condition
      • 0.12% fail on Presence
    • 0.25% fail on Axles
      • 0.25% fail on Swivel joints/housing (14 times worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on Fluid suspension
      • 0.12% fail on Other components
    • 0.12% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.12% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 30% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 11% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 9.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 7.6% fail on Front lamps (46% worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.12% fail on All position lamps
    • 8.7% fail on Direction indicators (110% worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 8.7% fail on Flashing type (110% worse than other 2001 vans)
        • 4.6% fail on Individual lamps (73% worse than other 2001 vans)
        • 3.6% fail on Side repeaters (190% worse than other 2001 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on All direction indicators (160% worse than other 2001 vans)
        • 0.49% fail on Switch (8 times worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 7.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 6.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.9% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.3% fail on Battery
    • 1.1% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.86% fail on Switch (2 times worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.49% fail on Lamp
      • 0.12% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.86% fail on Rear fog lamp (80% better than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.86% fail on Fog lamp (79% better than other 2001 vans)
    • 0.25% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.25% fail on Horn (92% better than other 2001 vans)
  • 20% fail on Brakes
    • 11% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.3% fail on Front wheels
      • 4.3% fail on Rear wheels
      • 2.0% fail on Service brake performance (47% better than other 2001 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance (77% better than other 2001 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.25% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.12% fail on Brake operation
    • 9.2% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 8.6% fail on Components
        • 3.0% fail on Valves
        • 2.8% fail on Hoses
        • 2.6% fail on Pipes (58% better than other 2001 vans)
        • 0.62% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.12% fail on Cylinders
      • 0.74% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.25% fail on Leaks
      • 0.12% fail on Operation
    • 3.7% fail on Hub components
      • 2.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.25% fail on Brake calipers
    • 0.86% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.86% fail on Pedal
        • 0.62% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2001 vans)
        • 0.25% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.49% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.49% fail on Condition
    • 0.37% fail on Additional braking devices (25 times worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 0.37% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.25% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.12% fail on Linkage
      • 0.12% fail on Cable
    • 0.12% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.12% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
  • 14% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 7.6% fail on Wipers
    • 5.3% fail on Washers
    • 2.8% fail on Mirrors (140% worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 0.62% fail on Windscreen
  • 11% fail on Tyres (44% worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 5.7% fail on Condition (74% worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 5.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.49% fail on Size/type
    • 0.25% fail on Valve stem
  • 10% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 7.4% fail on Exhaust system (51% worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Emissions
    • 1.6% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.62% fail on System
      • 0.37% fail on Pipe
      • 0.37% fail on Cap
      • 0.12% fail on Tank
      • 0.12% fail on Hose
    • 0.74% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 7.8% fail on Steering
    • 6.4% fail on Steering system
      • 3.6% fail on Track rod end
      • 2.0% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.86% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.25% fail on Free play
        • 0.25% fail on Steering rack
    • 1.5% fail on Power steering
      • 0.62% fail on Operation
      • 0.62% fail on Other components
      • 0.25% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.12% fail on Drive system
      • 0.12% fail on Pump
    • 0.25% fail on Steering operation
  • 7.8% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 3.8% fail on Body condition
    • 2.6% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 2.6% fail on Chassis
    • 1.2% fail on Doors
      • 0.99% fail on Passengers other (2 times worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Drivers
    • 0.37% fail on Spare wheel
    • 0.25% fail on Load security
      • 0.25% fail on Loading door
    • 0.12% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.12% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.12% fail on Body security
    • 0.12% fail on Seats
      • 0.12% fail on Passengers
  • 4.8% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 4.6% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.1% fail on Condition (110% worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Requirements (5 times worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Prescribed areas (69% better than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Attachment
    • 0.49% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.49% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 2.0% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 2.0% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.49% fail on Towbars
    • 0.49% fail on Vehicle structure
  • 0.37% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.25% fail on Attachment
    • 0.12% fail on Condition