Citroen Dispatch MOT Results
Registered in 200246.0% pass rate
from 517 tests in 2021
(15% worse than other 2002 vans)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Dispatch is unusually good or bad.
-
27% fail on
Suspension
(38% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 12% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (70% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
11% fail on
Suspension arms
(87% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 7.7% fail on Ball joint (140% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 2.3% fail on Pins and bushes
- 1.9% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.58% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.19% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
4.3% fail on
Sub-frames
(3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 2.5% fail on Sub-frame (11 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.39% fail on Pins and bushes (31 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.19% fail on Ball joint
-
4.1% fail on
Springs
-
3.7% fail on
Coil springs
(100% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 3.5% fail on Coil spring (96% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.19% fail on Mounting
- 0.39% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
3.7% fail on
Coil springs
(100% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
2.9% fail on
Macpherson strut
(9 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 2.1% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (15 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.97% fail on Macpherson strut (15 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
1.5% fail on
Axles
(5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (15 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.19% fail on Swivel joints/housing
-
0.97% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.39% fail on Pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.19% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.19% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.19% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.58% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.19% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.19% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.19% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.19% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
-
21% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
6.0% fail on
Direction indicators
-
6.0% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.9% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 2.9% fail on Side repeaters (140% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.39% fail on All direction indicators
-
6.0% fail on
Flashing type
- 5.6% fail on Stop lamp
-
5.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 5.0% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.39% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
5.0% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.6% fail on Headlamp
- 0.39% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 3.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.2% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.2% fail on Battery(ies)
-
0.58% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(84% better than other 2002 vans)
-
0.58% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(84% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.58% fail on Rear fog lamp (84% better than other 2002 vans)
-
0.58% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(84% better than other 2002 vans)
-
0.39% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.39% fail on Switch
-
0.19% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.19% fail on Position lamp
-
6.0% fail on
Direction indicators
-
20% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(33% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
8.1% fail on
Transmission
(66% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
7.7% fail on
Drive shafts
(100% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 7.7% fail on Joints (110% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
0.39% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.39% fail on Joints
-
7.7% fail on
Drive shafts
(100% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 7.2% fail on Exhaust system (110% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
5.2% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 4.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.39% fail on
Sub-frame
(7 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.39% fail on Sub-frame condition (8 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
3.5% fail on
Chassis
- 3.5% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.97% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.58% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.19% fail on Hose
- 0.19% fail on System
-
0.58% fail on
Doors
-
0.58% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.58% fail on Door condition
-
0.58% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.39% fail on Bumpers
-
0.39% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.19% fail on Spare wheel condition
- 0.19% fail on Carrier
-
0.39% fail on
Body
- 0.39% fail on Other body component
-
0.19% fail on
Towbar
- 0.19% fail on Other towbar components
-
0.19% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.19% fail on Engine mounting condition
-
8.1% fail on
Transmission
(66% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
18% fail on
Brakes
-
9.7% fail on
Brake performance
-
5.8% fail on
Service brake performance
-
5.8% fail on
Rbt
- 4.6% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
5.8% fail on
Rbt
-
4.3% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
4.3% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 3.9% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 1.2% fail on Service brake performance (65% better than other 2002 vans)
-
4.3% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
1.5% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(73% better than other 2002 vans)
- 1.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (73% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.58% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.58% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.58% fail on
Rbt
- 0.39% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.19% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.58% fail on
Rbt
-
5.8% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.9% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.5% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 2.5% fail on Brake discs
-
1.5% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.5% fail on Brake pads
-
0.58% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.39% fail on Cable
- 0.19% fail on Rod
-
2.5% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 3.7% fail on Load sensing valves
- 3.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 0.97% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.97% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
(3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.97% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
0.39% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.39% fail on Lever
-
0.39% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.19% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.19% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.19% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.19% fail on Pedal
-
0.19% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.19% fail on Leaks
-
9.7% fail on
Brake performance
-
11% fail on
Visibility
- 7.7% fail on Wipers
- 2.9% fail on Washers
-
0.97% fail on
View to rear
- 0.97% fail on Mirrors
-
0.39% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.39% fail on Windscreen
- 0.19% fail on Bonnet
-
9.3% fail on
Tyres
(76% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 5.6% fail on Tread depth (85% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 3.7% fail on Condition
- 0.58% fail on Size/type
-
6.6% fail on
Steering
-
2.9% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 2.5% fail on Track rod end
- 0.39% fail on Ball joint
-
2.3% fail on
Steering gear
- 2.1% fail on Steering rack
- 0.19% fail on Operation
-
1.4% fail on
Power steering
- 0.77% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.58% fail on Operation
- 0.19% fail on Other components
- 0.19% fail on Prescribed areas
-
2.9% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
5.4% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
5.0% fail on
Seat belts
- 2.7% fail on Prescribed areas
- 1.9% fail on Condition (140% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.19% fail on Attachment
- 0.19% fail on Requirements
- 0.39% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
5.0% fail on
Seat belts
-
4.8% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
3.9% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
3.7% fail on
Compression ignition
- 1.7% fail on Emissions not tested
- 1.2% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.39% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.39% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.19% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
-
0.19% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.19% fail on Catalyst emissions
-
3.7% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.97% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.97% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
3.9% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.97% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.97% fail on Registration plates
-
0.58% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.39% fail on Attachment
- 0.19% fail on Condition
-
0.39% fail on
Speedometer and speed limiter
- 0.39% fail on Speedometer (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
0.19% fail on
Seat belt installation check
- 0.19% fail on Anchorages