Citroen Dispatch MOT Results
Registered in 200348.3% pass rate
from 1,781 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Dispatch is unusually good or bad.
-
29% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 9.7% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
9.5% fail on
Position lamps
- 7.4% fail on Front lamps
- 2.5% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.17% fail on All position lamps
- 6.0% fail on Stop lamp
-
6.0% fail on
Direction indicators
(40% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
6.0% fail on
Flashing type
(40% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 3.1% fail on Individual lamps
- 3.0% fail on Side repeaters (170% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.73% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.51% fail on Switch (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
-
6.0% fail on
Flashing type
(40% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
5.5% fail on
Headlamps
(36% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 5.4% fail on Headlamp (36% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
0.056% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.056% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
- 0.056% fail on Matched pair
- 5.2% fail on Headlamp aim
-
1.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(50% better than other 2003 vans)
- 1.5% fail on Fog lamp (57% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.39% fail on Tell tale
- 0.11% fail on Switch
- 1.2% fail on Battery
-
0.34% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.17% fail on Switch
- 0.11% fail on Tell tale
- 0.056% fail on Lamp
- 0.34% fail on Horn (85% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.28% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.22% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.17% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.11% fail on Rear reflectors
-
25% fail on
Suspension
-
9.6% fail on
Drive shafts
(88% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
9.6% fail on
Front drive shafts
(92% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 9.6% fail on Constant velocity joints (94% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
9.6% fail on
Front drive shafts
(92% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
6.7% fail on
Suspension arms
(41% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 6.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (45% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.056% fail on Attachment
-
4.5% fail on
Prescribed areas
(40% better than other 2003 vans)
- 3.1% fail on Component mounting
- 1.3% fail on Subframe mounting
- 0.34% fail on Spring mounting (90% better than other 2003 vans)
-
3.3% fail on
Coil springs
- 3.2% fail on Condition
- 0.056% fail on Location
- 2.4% fail on Front suspension joints
-
1.9% fail on
Sub-frames
(8 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Condition (8 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.62% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (13 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.17% fail on Attachment (3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
-
1.7% fail on
Trailing arms
(16 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 1.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (16 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.11% fail on Attachment (19 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.056% fail on Condition
-
1.2% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 1.2% fail on Condition
-
0.79% fail on
Wheel bearings
(67% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.56% fail on Front (71% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.22% fail on Rear
-
0.34% fail on
Radius arms
(4 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.28% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.056% fail on Condition
-
0.22% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(96% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.056% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.056% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.056% fail on Attachment
- 0.056% fail on Presence
-
0.11% fail on
Bonded suspension
- 0.11% fail on Condition
-
0.11% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.11% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.11% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.11% fail on Condition
- 0.056% fail on General condition
-
0.056% fail on
Panhard rods
- 0.056% fail on Condition
-
0.056% fail on
Torque/reaction arms
- 0.056% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.056% fail on
Axles
- 0.056% fail on Swivel joints/housing
-
9.6% fail on
Drive shafts
(88% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
19% fail on
Brakes
(13% better than other 2003 vans)
-
10% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
10% fail on
Components
- 3.9% fail on Pipes (39% better than other 2003 vans)
- 3.8% fail on Valves
- 3.3% fail on Hoses (160% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.28% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.056% fail on Servos
- 0.28% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.22% fail on Leaks
- 0.11% fail on Operation
-
10% fail on
Components
-
8.6% fail on
Brake performance
(33% better than other 2003 vans)
- 5.3% fail on Front wheels
- 2.8% fail on Rear wheels (52% better than other 2003 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance (78% better than other 2003 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Service brake performance (58% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.95% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.17% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
3.5% fail on
Hub components
- 2.6% fail on Brake pads
- 1.1% fail on Brake discs
- 0.17% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.056% fail on Brake linings
- 0.056% fail on Wheel cylinder
-
0.51% fail on
Parking brake
(61% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.51% fail on Condition (61% better than other 2003 vans)
-
0.39% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.39% fail on
Pedal
- 0.39% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.39% fail on
Pedal
-
0.39% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.39% fail on Cable
- 0.34% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.11% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.056% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
-
0.056% fail on
Components
- 0.056% fail on Valves
-
10% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
14% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 8.6% fail on Wipers (26% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 5.0% fail on Washers
- 1.7% fail on Mirrors
- 0.79% fail on Windscreen
- 0.17% fail on Bonnet
-
10% fail on
Tyres
(20% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 6.9% fail on Tread depth (29% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 3.8% fail on Condition
- 0.62% fail on Size/type
- 0.056% fail on Valve stem
-
10% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(49% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 9.0% fail on Exhaust system (120% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
1.3% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.90% fail on System
- 0.22% fail on Cap
- 0.11% fail on Tank
- 0.11% fail on Pipe
- 0.79% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.62% fail on Emissions (65% better than other 2003 vans)
-
5.1% fail on
Steering
(31% better than other 2003 vans)
-
3.5% fail on
Steering system
(44% better than other 2003 vans)
- 2.5% fail on Track rod end (41% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.45% fail on Steering rack (60% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.34% fail on Steering arm
- 0.22% fail on Ball joint
-
0.17% fail on
Free play
- 0.17% fail on Steering rack
- 0.056% fail on Drag link end
-
1.7% fail on
Power steering
(80% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.67% fail on Operation
- 0.67% fail on Pipes and hoses (140% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.34% fail on Other components
- 0.17% fail on Rams (4 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.17% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.11% fail on Steering operation
-
0.056% fail on
Steering control
- 0.056% fail on Steering column
- 0.056% fail on Locking devices
-
3.5% fail on
Steering system
(44% better than other 2003 vans)
-
4.2% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(25% better than other 2003 vans)
-
4.0% fail on
Seat belts
- 2.1% fail on Prescribed areas
- 1.3% fail on Condition
- 0.84% fail on Requirements (3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.056% fail on Attachment
-
0.11% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(94% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.056% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
- 0.056% fail on Drivers airbag
-
4.0% fail on
Seat belts
-
4.0% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(42% better than other 2003 vans)
- 1.7% fail on Body condition (53% better than other 2003 vans)
-
1.0% fail on
Doors
- 0.51% fail on Passengers other
- 0.34% fail on Passengers front
- 0.17% fail on Drivers
-
0.73% fail on
Vehicle structure
(64% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.73% fail on Chassis (64% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.28% fail on Spare wheel
- 0.22% fail on Engine mountings
-
0.17% fail on
Seats
- 0.11% fail on Passengers
- 0.056% fail on Drivers
-
0.11% fail on
Load security
- 0.056% fail on Tailgate
- 0.056% fail on Loading door
- 0.056% fail on Body security
-
1.8% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.8% fail on Registration plate
-
0.11% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.11% fail on Attachment