MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Citroen » Dispatch » 2003
Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Citroen Dispatch MOT Results

Registered in 2003
48.3% pass rate
from 1,781 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Dispatch is unusually good or bad.

  • 29% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 9.7% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 9.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 7.4% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.5% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.17% fail on All position lamps
    • 6.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 6.0% fail on Direction indicators (40% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 6.0% fail on Flashing type (40% worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 3.1% fail on Individual lamps
        • 3.0% fail on Side repeaters (170% worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.73% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.51% fail on Switch (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 5.5% fail on Headlamps (36% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 5.4% fail on Headlamp (36% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.056% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.056% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
      • 0.056% fail on Matched pair
    • 5.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (50% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Fog lamp (57% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.11% fail on Switch
    • 1.2% fail on Battery
    • 0.34% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.17% fail on Switch
      • 0.11% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.056% fail on Lamp
    • 0.34% fail on Horn (85% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.28% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.22% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.17% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.11% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 25% fail on Suspension
    • 9.6% fail on Drive shafts (88% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 9.6% fail on Front drive shafts (92% worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 9.6% fail on Constant velocity joints (94% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 6.7% fail on Suspension arms (41% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 6.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (45% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.056% fail on Attachment
    • 4.5% fail on Prescribed areas (40% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 3.1% fail on Component mounting
      • 1.3% fail on Subframe mounting
      • 0.34% fail on Spring mounting (90% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Coil springs
      • 3.2% fail on Condition
      • 0.056% fail on Location
    • 2.4% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.9% fail on Sub-frames (8 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Condition (8 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.62% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (13 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Attachment (3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Trailing arms (16 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (16 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment (19 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.056% fail on Condition
    • 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.79% fail on Wheel bearings (67% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.56% fail on Front (71% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Rear
    • 0.34% fail on Radius arms (4 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.056% fail on Condition
    • 0.22% fail on Anti-roll bars (96% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.056% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.056% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.056% fail on Attachment
      • 0.056% fail on Presence
    • 0.11% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
    • 0.11% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.11% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.11% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
    • 0.056% fail on General condition
    • 0.056% fail on Panhard rods
      • 0.056% fail on Condition
    • 0.056% fail on Torque/reaction arms
      • 0.056% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.056% fail on Axles
      • 0.056% fail on Swivel joints/housing
  • 19% fail on Brakes (13% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 10% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 10% fail on Components
        • 3.9% fail on Pipes (39% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 3.8% fail on Valves
        • 3.3% fail on Hoses (160% worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.28% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.056% fail on Servos
      • 0.28% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.22% fail on Leaks
      • 0.11% fail on Operation
    • 8.6% fail on Brake performance (33% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 5.3% fail on Front wheels
      • 2.8% fail on Rear wheels (52% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance (78% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance (58% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.95% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.17% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.5% fail on Hub components
      • 2.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.1% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.17% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.056% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.056% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 0.51% fail on Parking brake (61% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.51% fail on Condition (61% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.39% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.39% fail on Pedal
        • 0.39% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.39% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.39% fail on Cable
    • 0.34% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.11% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.056% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
      • 0.056% fail on Components
        • 0.056% fail on Valves
  • 14% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 8.6% fail on Wipers (26% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on Washers
    • 1.7% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.79% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.17% fail on Bonnet
  • 10% fail on Tyres (20% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 6.9% fail on Tread depth (29% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Condition
    • 0.62% fail on Size/type
    • 0.056% fail on Valve stem
  • 10% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (49% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 9.0% fail on Exhaust system (120% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.90% fail on System
      • 0.22% fail on Cap
      • 0.11% fail on Tank
      • 0.11% fail on Pipe
    • 0.79% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.62% fail on Emissions (65% better than other 2003 vans)
  • 5.1% fail on Steering (31% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Steering system (44% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Track rod end (41% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.45% fail on Steering rack (60% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.17% fail on Free play
        • 0.17% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.056% fail on Drag link end
    • 1.7% fail on Power steering (80% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.67% fail on Operation
      • 0.67% fail on Pipes and hoses (140% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Other components
      • 0.17% fail on Rams (4 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.17% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.11% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.056% fail on Steering control
      • 0.056% fail on Steering column
    • 0.056% fail on Locking devices
  • 4.2% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (25% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.1% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
      • 0.84% fail on Requirements (3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.056% fail on Attachment
    • 0.11% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (94% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.056% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.056% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 4.0% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (42% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Body condition (53% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Doors
      • 0.51% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.34% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.17% fail on Drivers
    • 0.73% fail on Vehicle structure (64% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.73% fail on Chassis (64% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.28% fail on Spare wheel
    • 0.22% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.17% fail on Seats
      • 0.11% fail on Passengers
      • 0.056% fail on Drivers
    • 0.11% fail on Load security
      • 0.056% fail on Tailgate
      • 0.056% fail on Loading door
    • 0.056% fail on Body security
  • 1.8% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.8% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.11% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.11% fail on Attachment