Citroen Dispatch MOT Results
Registered in 200449.0% pass rate
from 1,196 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Dispatch is unusually good or bad.
-
26% fail on
Suspension
(23% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
12% fail on
Suspension arms
(73% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 7.2% fail on Ball joint (73% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 3.5% fail on Pins and bushes (110% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 2.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover (93% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.25% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.084% fail on Suspension arm
- 11% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (75% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
4.3% fail on
Springs
-
4.1% fail on
Coil springs
(74% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 4.1% fail on Coil spring (76% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.25% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
4.1% fail on
Coil springs
(74% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
2.3% fail on
Sub-frames
(150% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.92% fail on Sub-frame (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.92% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.42% fail on Pins and bushes (8 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.084% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
1.8% fail on
Other suspension component
(140% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 1.0% fail on Pins and bushes (18 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.59% fail on Ball joint
- 0.25% fail on Other suspension component (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.17% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 1.0% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.84% fail on
Axles
(8 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.84% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (13 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.50% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.42% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.42% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
-
0.42% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(93% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.25% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.084% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.084% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
-
0.25% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.084% fail on Suspension rod
- 0.084% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.084% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
12% fail on
Suspension arms
(73% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
20% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(46% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
8.6% fail on
Transmission
(86% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
8.5% fail on
Drive shafts
(120% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 8.4% fail on Joints (120% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.084% fail on Flexible couplings
-
0.084% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.084% fail on Joints
-
8.5% fail on
Drive shafts
(120% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 7.4% fail on Exhaust system (130% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
4.8% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(53% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 4.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (50% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
0.25% fail on
Sub-frame
(5 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.25% fail on Sub-frame condition (5 times worse than other 2004 vans)
-
2.4% fail on
Chassis
- 2.4% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.59% fail on
Body
- 0.42% fail on Other body component
- 0.17% fail on Panel
-
0.50% fail on
Doors
-
0.42% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.42% fail on Door condition
-
0.17% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.084% fail on Catch
- 0.084% fail on Hinge
-
0.42% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
0.42% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.17% fail on Pipe
- 0.084% fail on Hose
- 0.084% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.084% fail on System
-
0.42% fail on
Spare wheel
(2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.25% fail on Spare wheel condition (4 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.25% fail on Carrier
-
0.25% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.25% fail on Engine mounting condition
-
0.25% fail on
Cabs
- 0.25% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.17% fail on Bumpers
-
0.17% fail on
Load security
- 0.17% fail on Loading door
-
0.084% fail on
Seats
- 0.084% fail on Passenger's seat
-
8.6% fail on
Transmission
(86% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
19% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
5.4% fail on
Headlamps
- 5.4% fail on Headlamp
- 0.17% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
4.8% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim
- 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (170% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
4.0% fail on
Direction indicators
-
4.0% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.4% fail on Side repeaters (110% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.33% fail on Switch (7 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.084% fail on All direction indicators
-
4.0% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.6% fail on Stop lamp (38% better than other 2004 vans)
- 3.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.8% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.0% fail on Horn
- 0.42% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.25% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.17% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.84% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.75% fail on Position lamp
- 0.084% fail on All position lamps
-
0.75% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(75% better than other 2004 vans)
-
0.75% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(75% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.67% fail on Rear fog lamp (78% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.084% fail on Switch
-
0.75% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(75% better than other 2004 vans)
-
0.25% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.17% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
- 0.084% fail on Main beam tell-tale
-
0.084% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.084% fail on Switch
- 0.084% fail on Rear reflectors
-
5.4% fail on
Headlamps
-
14% fail on
Brakes
(23% better than other 2004 vans)
-
7.4% fail on
Brake performance
(35% better than other 2004 vans)
-
4.5% fail on
Service brake performance
-
4.3% fail on
Rbt
- 3.3% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.17% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.17% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
4.3% fail on
Rbt
-
2.5% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
2.5% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 1.9% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
-
2.5% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
1.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(80% better than other 2004 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (80% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.67% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.33% fail on
Parking brake performance
(86% better than other 2004 vans)
-
0.33% fail on
Rbt
(86% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.33% fail on Parking brake performance (84% better than other 2004 vans)
-
0.33% fail on
Rbt
(86% better than other 2004 vans)
-
4.5% fail on
Service brake performance
- 4.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
2.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.2% fail on Brake pads
- 0.084% fail on Brake linings
-
0.92% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.92% fail on Brake discs
-
0.17% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.084% fail on Cable
- 0.084% fail on Lever
-
1.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
1.3% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 1.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.25% fail on Electronic stability control
-
0.92% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.92% fail on Pedal (130% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.92% fail on Load sensing valves
-
0.50% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.17% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.17% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.084% fail on Servos
- 0.084% fail on Valves
- 0.50% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.25% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.17% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
- 0.084% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.25% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
-
0.25% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.17% fail on Other braking system component
- 0.084% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
-
0.25% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
0.17% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.17% fail on Lever
-
7.4% fail on
Brake performance
(35% better than other 2004 vans)
-
9.8% fail on
Visibility
- 6.5% fail on Wipers
- 2.7% fail on Washers (45% better than other 2004 vans)
-
0.92% fail on
View to rear
- 0.92% fail on Mirrors
-
0.25% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.25% fail on Windscreen
- 0.084% fail on Bonnet
-
7.4% fail on
Tyres
- 4.3% fail on Tread depth
- 3.2% fail on Condition
- 0.42% fail on Size/type
-
5.5% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
3.8% fail on
Seat belts
- 3.0% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.67% fail on Condition
- 0.17% fail on Requirements
- 1.9% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
3.8% fail on
Seat belts
-
4.7% fail on
Steering
(33% better than other 2004 vans)
-
3.8% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 3.4% fail on Track rod end
- 0.25% fail on Ball joint
- 0.084% fail on Drag link end
-
0.084% fail on
Other components
- 0.084% fail on Steering component
-
0.59% fail on
Power steering
- 0.25% fail on Rams (10 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.17% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.084% fail on Operation
- 0.084% fail on Other components
-
0.33% fail on
Steering gear
(74% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.33% fail on Steering rack (72% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.084% fail on Prescribed areas
-
3.8% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
3.5% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
2.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.3% fail on
Compression ignition
- 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.75% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (56% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.25% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.17% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
0.084% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.084% fail on Catalytic converter
-
0.59% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.25% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.17% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.17% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.084% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
2.3% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.67% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.42% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.25% fail on Other leaks
-
2.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.50% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.50% fail on Registration plates
-
0.17% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.084% fail on Condition
- 0.084% fail on Attachment