MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Citroen » Dispatch » 2004

Citroen Dispatch MOT Results

Registered in 2004
48.4% pass rate
from 1,882 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Dispatch is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Suspension
    • 12% fail on Suspension arms (71% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 7.1% fail on Ball joint (64% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on Pins and bushes (77% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover (140% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Suspension arm
    • 7.9% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (31% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Springs
      • 3.4% fail on Coil springs (50% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 3.3% fail on Coil spring (49% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.053% fail on Mounting
      • 0.053% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.2% fail on Sub-frames (190% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Sub-frame (5 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.64% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.37% fail on Pins and bushes (9 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (8 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.1% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.69% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.27% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.053% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.80% fail on Axles (5 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.48% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (8 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Axle (8 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.64% fail on Macpherson strut (130% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.64% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.48% fail on Wheel bearings (78% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Anti-roll bars (98% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.053% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.053% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 0.053% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.053% fail on Suspension unit
  • 21% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (12% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 4.7% fail on Stop lamp (28% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.27% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.2% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.32% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.11% fail on Switch
      • 0.053% fail on Semaphore
        • 0.053% fail on Arm
    • 4.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.3% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.16% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.9% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.053% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (31% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.5% fail on Horn
      • 0.64% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.21% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 1.1% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (64% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (64% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (63% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.053% fail on Switch
    • 0.27% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.27% fail on Switch
    • 0.11% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 20% fail on Body, chassis, structure (41% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 8.6% fail on Transmission (73% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 8.1% fail on Drive shafts (98% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 8.0% fail on Joints (99% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.053% fail on Flexible couplings
        • 0.053% fail on Bearing housing
      • 0.48% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.48% fail on Joints
    • 7.8% fail on Exhaust system (120% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure (43% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 3.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.27% fail on Sub-frame (5 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.27% fail on Sub-frame condition (6 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.053% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 1.3% fail on Fuel system (70% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.74% fail on Pipe (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on System
      • 0.16% fail on Tank
      • 0.11% fail on Hose
      • 0.053% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 1.0% fail on Chassis (58% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.96% fail on Chassis condition (60% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.053% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.90% fail on Doors
      • 0.53% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.37% fail on Door condition
        • 0.16% fail on Catch (9 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.11% fail on Door condition
        • 0.11% fail on Hinge (15 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.11% fail on Door condition
        • 0.053% fail on Catch
    • 0.53% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.53% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.43% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.11% fail on Bracket
    • 0.48% fail on Body
      • 0.27% fail on Other body component
      • 0.16% fail on Panel
      • 0.11% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 0.37% fail on Seats
      • 0.21% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.16% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.32% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.16% fail on Spare wheel condition
      • 0.16% fail on Carrier
    • 0.27% fail on Towbar
      • 0.27% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.053% fail on Load security
      • 0.053% fail on Loading door
    • 0.053% fail on Floor
    • 0.053% fail on Cabs
      • 0.053% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 14% fail on Brakes (25% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 7.2% fail on Brake performance (36% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 4.9% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.8% fail on Rbt
          • 3.8% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.053% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.053% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 2.9% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 2.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 2.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (80% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (80% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.53% fail on Parking brake performance (78% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.48% fail on Rbt (80% better than other 2004 vans)
          • 0.32% fail on Parking brake performance (85% better than other 2004 vans)
          • 0.16% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.053% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.053% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.32% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes (24% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.8% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.053% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.90% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.90% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.16% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (75% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.11% fail on Cable
        • 0.053% fail on Lever
    • 1.5% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.80% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.80% fail on Pedal
    • 0.80% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.53% fail on Anti-lock braking system (62% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.53% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.32% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.21% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.053% fail on Servos
      • 0.053% fail on Valves
    • 0.16% fail on Parking brake control (75% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Lever (74% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.053% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.053% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.11% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.053% fail on Other components
      • 0.053% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.053% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
    • 0.053% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.053% fail on Servos
  • 11% fail on Visibility
    • 6.4% fail on Wipers
    • 4.0% fail on Washers
    • 1.1% fail on View to rear
      • 1.0% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.053% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.37% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.37% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.16% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.11% fail on Bonnet
  • 8.7% fail on Tyres (24% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 5.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.48% fail on Size/type
  • 6.1% fail on Steering
    • 4.9% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 4.5% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.43% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.053% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.053% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.64% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.64% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.43% fail on Power steering
      • 0.16% fail on Operation
      • 0.11% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.11% fail on Other components
      • 0.053% fail on Pump
    • 0.21% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.11% fail on Steering play
      • 0.11% fail on Steering rack
  • 4.8% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.6% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.58% fail on Condition
      • 0.11% fail on Requirements
    • 1.7% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.053% fail on Airbags
      • 0.053% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 4.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (25% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Exhaust emissions (36% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Compression ignition (32% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 1.0% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (57% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.96% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.64% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (200% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.11% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.11% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (82% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.053% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.053% fail on Catalytic converter
      • 0.48% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.16% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.16% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.11% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.053% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 1.2% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.0% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.16% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.053% fail on Other leaks
  • 0.53% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.53% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.27% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.11% fail on Attachment
    • 0.11% fail on Hubs (15 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.053% fail on Condition
  • 0.11% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.11% fail on Speedometer