Citroen Dispatch MOT Results
Registered in 200447.9% pass rate
from 2,252 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Dispatch is unusually good or bad.
-
30% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 11% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
8.7% fail on
Position lamps
- 7.2% fail on Front lamps
- 1.9% fail on Rear lamps (33% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.044% fail on All position lamps
- 7.0% fail on Headlamp aim
- 6.0% fail on Stop lamp (19% better than other 2004 vans)
-
4.8% fail on
Direction indicators
-
4.8% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.0% fail on Side repeaters (180% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 1.8% fail on Individual lamps (33% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.36% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.36% fail on Switch (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
-
4.8% fail on
Flashing type
-
4.3% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.3% fail on Headlamp
-
0.044% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.044% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
- 0.044% fail on Switch
- 1.6% fail on Horn
-
1.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(62% better than other 2004 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Fog lamp (66% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.18% fail on Tell tale
- 0.089% fail on Switch
- 0.98% fail on Battery
- 0.40% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.27% fail on
Hazard warning
(68% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.18% fail on Lamp
- 0.13% fail on Switch (77% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.27% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.089% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.044% fail on Rear reflectors
-
25% fail on
Suspension
-
8.4% fail on
Suspension arms
(80% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 8.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (81% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.18% fail on Condition
- 0.089% fail on Attachment
-
8.3% fail on
Drive shafts
(86% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
8.2% fail on
Front drive shafts
(88% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 8.2% fail on Constant velocity joints (90% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
0.089% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.089% fail on Drive shafts
-
8.2% fail on
Front drive shafts
(88% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
4.7% fail on
Prescribed areas
(30% better than other 2004 vans)
- 3.1% fail on Component mounting
- 1.6% fail on Subframe mounting (67% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.18% fail on Spring mounting (94% better than other 2004 vans)
-
3.3% fail on
Coil springs
- 3.2% fail on Condition
- 0.13% fail on Location
- 3.1% fail on Front suspension joints
-
2.3% fail on
Trailing arms
(18 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 2.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (19 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.089% fail on Condition (13 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.089% fail on Attachment (10 times worse than other 2004 vans)
-
1.5% fail on
Sub-frames
(6 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.67% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.58% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (11 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.27% fail on Attachment (5 times worse than other 2004 vans)
-
1.1% fail on
Shock absorbers
(46% better than other 2004 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Condition (46% better than other 2004 vans)
-
0.62% fail on
Wheel bearings
(74% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.49% fail on Front (74% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Rear
-
0.36% fail on
Radius arms
(5 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.36% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (6 times worse than other 2004 vans)
-
0.27% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.27% fail on Condition
-
0.089% fail on
Bonded suspension
- 0.089% fail on Condition
-
0.089% fail on
Axles
- 0.044% fail on Axle beam
- 0.044% fail on Swivel joints/housing
-
0.044% fail on
Torque/reaction arms
- 0.044% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.044% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.044% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
-
8.4% fail on
Suspension arms
(80% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
17% fail on
Brakes
(19% better than other 2004 vans)
-
7.9% fail on
Brake performance
(32% better than other 2004 vans)
- 4.8% fail on Front wheels (50% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 2.5% fail on Rear wheels (54% better than other 2004 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance (77% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.93% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.67% fail on Service brake performance (63% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.089% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 0.044% fail on Brake operation
-
6.8% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(21% better than other 2004 vans)
-
6.2% fail on
Components
(23% better than other 2004 vans)
- 4.0% fail on Pipes (33% better than other 2004 vans)
- 2.1% fail on Valves
- 0.44% fail on Hoses (54% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.36% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.40% fail on Leaks
- 0.31% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.31% fail on Operation
-
6.2% fail on
Components
(23% better than other 2004 vans)
-
2.7% fail on
Hub components
- 2.2% fail on Brake pads
- 0.62% fail on Brake discs
- 0.089% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.089% fail on Wheel cylinder
- 0.98% fail on ABS
-
0.89% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.89% fail on
Pedal
- 0.84% fail on Anti-slip
- 0.044% fail on Condition
-
0.89% fail on
Pedal
-
0.58% fail on
Parking brake
(55% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.58% fail on Condition (55% better than other 2004 vans)
-
0.49% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.49% fail on Cable
- 0.44% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.13% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.13% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
-
7.9% fail on
Brake performance
(32% better than other 2004 vans)
-
13% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 7.9% fail on Wipers (24% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 4.4% fail on Washers
- 1.7% fail on Mirrors
- 0.89% fail on Windscreen
- 0.089% fail on Bonnet
-
11% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(68% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 9.1% fail on Exhaust system (130% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 1.0% fail on Emissions
-
0.98% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.58% fail on System
- 0.18% fail on Pipe
- 0.18% fail on Cap
- 0.044% fail on Hose
- 0.93% fail on Emissions not tested
-
9.1% fail on
Tyres
- 5.2% fail on Tread depth
- 4.1% fail on Condition
- 0.40% fail on Size/type
- 0.13% fail on Valve stem
-
5.4% fail on
Steering
(23% better than other 2004 vans)
-
4.7% fail on
Steering system
- 3.3% fail on Track rod end
- 0.75% fail on Ball joint
- 0.49% fail on Steering rack
-
0.089% fail on
Free play
- 0.089% fail on Steering rack
- 0.089% fail on Steering arm
- 0.044% fail on Drag link end
-
0.80% fail on
Power steering
- 0.40% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.22% fail on Operation
- 0.18% fail on Other components
- 0.044% fail on Steering operation
-
4.7% fail on
Steering system
-
5.1% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
3.1% fail on
Seat belts
- 2.1% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.75% fail on Condition
- 0.089% fail on Requirements
- 0.089% fail on Attachment
-
0.044% fail on
Installation check
- 0.044% fail on Belt(s)/padding
-
2.0% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 2.0% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
- 0.089% fail on Drivers airbag
-
3.1% fail on
Seat belts
-
3.6% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(43% better than other 2004 vans)
- 1.7% fail on Body condition (51% better than other 2004 vans)
-
0.62% fail on
Vehicle structure
(64% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.62% fail on Chassis (64% better than other 2004 vans)
-
0.49% fail on
Doors
- 0.31% fail on Passengers other
- 0.089% fail on Drivers
- 0.089% fail on Passengers front
- 0.31% fail on Engine mountings
- 0.22% fail on Spare wheel
-
0.18% fail on
Seats
- 0.18% fail on Passengers
-
0.13% fail on
Load security
- 0.089% fail on Loading door
- 0.044% fail on Bootlid
- 0.044% fail on Speedometer
- 0.044% fail on Body security
-
0.71% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.71% fail on Registration plate
-
0.18% fail on
Towbars
- 0.18% fail on Vehicle structure
-
0.044% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.044% fail on Attachment