MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Citroen » Dispatch » 2009

Citroen Dispatch MOT Results

Registered in 2009
48.3% pass rate
from 2,183 tests in 2021
(13% worse than other 2009 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Dispatch is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (24% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 8.7% fail on Stop lamp (41% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 4.8% fail on Headlamps (34% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 4.6% fail on Headlamp (36% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 4.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 4.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.41% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.0% fail on Direction indicators (51% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 4.0% fail on Flashing type (51% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 3.5% fail on Individual direction indicators (100% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.41% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.046% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.046% fail on Switch
    • 3.8% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (54% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 3.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (54% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 3.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (54% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.60% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.60% fail on Switch
    • 0.60% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.32% fail on Horn
      • 0.18% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.092% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.32% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.18% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.18% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.14% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.14% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.046% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.046% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 17% fail on Body, chassis, structure (88% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 13% fail on Transmission (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 12% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 12% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.092% fail on Flexible couplings (7 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.60% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.60% fail on Joints
    • 5.0% fail on Exhaust system (140% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.41% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.41% fail on Doors
      • 0.23% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.23% fail on Door condition
      • 0.092% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.092% fail on Door condition
      • 0.092% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.046% fail on Door condition
        • 0.046% fail on Catch
    • 0.37% fail on Spare wheel (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Carrier (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.092% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.27% fail on Body
      • 0.18% fail on Other body component
      • 0.046% fail on Mounting fixings
      • 0.046% fail on Panel
    • 0.23% fail on Integral vehicle structure (79% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (78% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.23% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.18% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.046% fail on Pipe
    • 0.092% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.092% fail on Bracket
    • 0.046% fail on Chassis
      • 0.046% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.046% fail on Towbar
      • 0.046% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.046% fail on Seats
      • 0.046% fail on Driver's seat
  • 16% fail on Suspension
    • 8.1% fail on Suspension arms (32% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 6.7% fail on Ball joint (120% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.27% fail on Pins and bushes (87% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 7.9% fail on Anti-roll bars (22% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 3.6% fail on Linkage ball joints (59% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.0% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.55% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.32% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.23% fail on Linkage
      • 0.092% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.046% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.046% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.5% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.60% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (66% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.50% fail on Springs (90% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.50% fail on Coil springs (82% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.46% fail on Coil spring (84% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.046% fail on Mounting
    • 0.23% fail on Shock absorbers (67% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.23% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.14% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.046% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.046% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.23% fail on Other suspension component (66% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.046% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.092% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.046% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.046% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.046% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.046% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 9.5% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 5.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.046% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 3.8% fail on Service brake performance (44% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 3.8% fail on Rbt (43% worse than other 2009 vans)
          • 3.1% fail on Service brake performance (45% worse than other 2009 vans)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.046% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.046% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.046% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.046% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 3.0% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.8% fail on Rbt
          • 2.7% fail on Parking brake performance (43% worse than other 2009 vans)
          • 0.092% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
          • 0.046% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.092% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.046% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.046% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.046% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.046% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.82% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.78% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.69% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.18% fail on Service brake performance (73% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.046% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.046% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.23% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.0% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.6% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.6% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.27% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.18% fail on Lever
        • 0.046% fail on Cable
        • 0.046% fail on Linkage
    • 1.9% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (180% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Pedal (180% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.46% fail on Hand lever (190% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.82% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.82% fail on Lever
    • 0.55% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (60% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.55% fail on Anti-lock braking system (57% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.50% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.18% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.092% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.046% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.046% fail on Valves
    • 0.092% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.092% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.046% fail on Hand operated control valves
      • 0.046% fail on Condition
    • 0.046% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.046% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.046% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
  • 12% fail on Visibility (35% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 6.0% fail on Wipers (47% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 5.9% fail on Washers (35% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.60% fail on View to rear
      • 0.60% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.41% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.41% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.046% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.046% fail on Bonnet
  • 7.0% fail on Tyres
    • 4.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.4% fail on Condition
    • 0.23% fail on Size/type
  • 5.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (26% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Exhaust emissions (35% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.8% fail on Compression ignition (46% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (36% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.73% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (66% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.41% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.092% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.046% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.046% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.046% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.046% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 1.6% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.27% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.23% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.092% fail on Non catalyst emissions
    • 1.1% fail on Fluid leaks (80% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Engine oil leaks (120% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.092% fail on Other leaks
  • 3.4% fail on Steering (34% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Steering linkage components (65% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Track rod end (64% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.3% fail on Power steering (190% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.64% fail on Other components (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.46% fail on Operation (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.046% fail on Rams
    • 0.73% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.73% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.23% fail on Steering wheel (8 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.092% fail on Steering column
  • 2.2% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.69% fail on Condition
      • 0.55% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.046% fail on Attachment
    • 0.92% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.046% fail on Airbags
      • 0.046% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.46% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.46% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.092% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.092% fail on Attachment
  • 0.046% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.046% fail on Anchorages