Citroen Dispatch MOT Results

Registered in 2009
50.2% pass rate
from 2,385 tests in 2020
(11% worse than other 2009 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Dispatch is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (21% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 10% fail on Stop lamp (57% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 5.7% fail on Position lamps (57% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 5.7% fail on Position lamp (60% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.042% fail on All position lamps
    • 5.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.25% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.0% fail on Direction indicators (56% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 4.0% fail on Flashing type (55% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 3.5% fail on Individual direction indicators (100% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.34% fail on All direction indicators (200% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Side repeaters (85% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.042% fail on Semaphore
        • 0.042% fail on Arm
    • 3.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.8% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.042% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (62% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 3.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (62% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 3.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (64% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.63% fail on Hazard warning (130% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.63% fail on Switch (130% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.42% fail on Electrical equipment (68% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Horn (73% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.25% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.25% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.13% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.042% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.042% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 16% fail on Body, chassis, structure (110% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 12% fail on Transmission (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 12% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 12% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.084% fail on Drive shaft
        • 0.042% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.34% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.34% fail on Joints
    • 3.9% fail on Exhaust system (110% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.42% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.21% fail on System
      • 0.13% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.042% fail on Tank
      • 0.042% fail on Hose
    • 0.42% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.42% fail on Engine mounting (200% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Engine mounting condition (190% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.084% fail on Bracket
    • 0.42% fail on Doors
      • 0.25% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.21% fail on Door condition
        • 0.042% fail on Catch
      • 0.084% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.084% fail on Door condition
      • 0.084% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.084% fail on Door condition
    • 0.29% fail on Body
      • 0.25% fail on Other body component
      • 0.042% fail on Panel
    • 0.13% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.084% fail on Spare wheel condition
      • 0.042% fail on Carrier
    • 0.13% fail on Undertray
    • 0.084% fail on Seats
      • 0.084% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.042% fail on Chassis
      • 0.042% fail on Chassis condition
  • 14% fail on Suspension (14% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 7.0% fail on Suspension arms (41% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 5.5% fail on Ball joint (130% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint dust cover (68% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.46% fail on Pins and bushes (75% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 6.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.6% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.67% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.67% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.34% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.084% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.042% fail on Linkage
    • 0.67% fail on Wheel bearings (52% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.67% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.50% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.084% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.34% fail on Springs (92% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Coil springs (86% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.34% fail on Coil spring (86% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.17% fail on Shock absorbers (85% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.17% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (78% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.084% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.084% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.084% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.084% fail on Bellows (17 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.042% fail on Operation
      • 0.042% fail on Pipes
  • 12% fail on Visibility (36% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 5.5% fail on Washers (43% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on Wipers (29% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.96% fail on View to rear
      • 0.96% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.63% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.63% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.084% fail on Driver's view
  • 11% fail on Brakes (22% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 6.8% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.8% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (26% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 3.8% fail on Rbt (sp) (25% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.7% fail on Rbt
          • 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.84% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.7% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.6% fail on Rbt
          • 2.4% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.21% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.084% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.042% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.042% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.63% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.63% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.46% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.21% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.084% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.5% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.042% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.3% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.29% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.13% fail on Lever
        • 0.084% fail on Cable
        • 0.084% fail on Pivot
    • 1.0% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.67% fail on Pedal
      • 0.34% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.42% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.42% fail on Lever
    • 0.34% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.13% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.042% fail on Master cylinder
      • 0.042% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.042% fail on Valves
    • 0.13% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.13% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.042% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.042% fail on Servos
    • 0.042% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 7.4% fail on Tyres
    • 5.5% fail on Tread depth (39% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.34% fail on Size/type
  • 4.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (36% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Exhaust emissions (45% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.9% fail on Compression ignition (47% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (33% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 1.0% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (60% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.34% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.80% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.71% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.13% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.042% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.96% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.80% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.084% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.084% fail on Other leaks
  • 3.3% fail on Steering (30% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Power steering (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.84% fail on Operation (5 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Other components (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 1.2% fail on Steering linkage components (69% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.96% fail on Track rod end (72% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.084% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.55% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.55% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.34% fail on Steering wheel (12 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.13% fail on Steering play
      • 0.13% fail on Steering rack
  • 1.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.88% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.63% fail on Condition
      • 0.13% fail on Attachment
      • 0.084% fail on Prescribed areas (86% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.042% fail on Requirements
    • 0.84% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.084% fail on Airbags
      • 0.084% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.59% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.59% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.17% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.13% fail on Attachment
    • 0.042% fail on Condition
  • 0.042% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.042% fail on Anchorages