Do you want the Road Tax system to change? Do you have thoughts on the potential changes to the Road Tax system? | No thanks
Citroen Relay MOT Results
Registered in 199552.5% pass rate
from 61 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Relay is unusually good or bad.
-
30% fail on
Suspension
-
20% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 13% fail on Component mounting
- 13% fail on Spring mounting (3 times worse than other 1995 vans)
- 8.2% fail on Subframe mounting (2 times worse than other 1995 vans)
-
9.8% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 1995 vans)
-
9.8% fail on
Front drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 1995 vans)
- 9.8% fail on Constant velocity joints (2 times worse than other 1995 vans)
-
9.8% fail on
Front drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 1995 vans)
-
6.6% fail on
Suspension arms
- 6.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
3.3% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 3.3% fail on Condition
-
1.6% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.6% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
-
1.6% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 1.6% fail on Rear
-
20% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
26% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 6.6% fail on Battery
-
6.6% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 6.6% fail on Fog lamp
- 6.6% fail on Stop lamp
-
6.6% fail on
Direction indicators
-
6.6% fail on
Flashing type
- 4.9% fail on Side repeaters
- 1.6% fail on Individual lamps
-
6.6% fail on
Flashing type
- 6.6% fail on Headlamp aim
- 4.9% fail on Horn
-
3.3% fail on
Position lamps
- 3.3% fail on Rear lamps
- 3.3% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
3.3% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.3% fail on Headlamp
-
26% fail on
Brakes
-
18% fail on
Brake performance
- 15% fail on Front wheels (180% worse than other 1995 vans)
- 8.2% fail on Parking brake performance
- 6.6% fail on Rear wheels
- 4.9% fail on Brake imbalance (3 times worse than other 1995 vans)
- 3.3% fail on Service brake performance
-
9.8% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
9.8% fail on
Components
- 4.9% fail on Pipes
- 4.9% fail on Hoses
- 1.6% fail on Valves
-
9.8% fail on
Components
-
1.6% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.6% fail on Condition
-
1.6% fail on
Service brake control components
-
1.6% fail on
Pedal
- 1.6% fail on Anti-slip
-
1.6% fail on
Pedal
-
18% fail on
Brake performance
-
16% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
9.8% fail on
Vehicle structure
(2 times worse than other 1995 vans)
- 9.8% fail on Chassis (2 times worse than other 1995 vans)
- 8.2% fail on Body condition
-
1.6% fail on
Doors
- 1.6% fail on Drivers
-
9.8% fail on
Vehicle structure
(2 times worse than other 1995 vans)
-
9.8% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
9.8% fail on
Seat belts
- 6.6% fail on Prescribed areas
- 3.3% fail on Attachment (15 times worse than other 1995 vans)
-
9.8% fail on
Seat belts
-
9.8% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 8.2% fail on Wipers
- 4.9% fail on Washers
-
8.2% fail on
Steering
-
3.3% fail on
Steering system
- 1.6% fail on Ball joint
- 1.6% fail on Track rod end
-
3.3% fail on
Power steering
- 1.6% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 1.6% fail on Other components
- 1.6% fail on Steering operation
-
3.3% fail on
Steering system
-
8.2% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 8.2% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.6% fail on
Towbars
- 1.6% fail on Vehicle structure
-
1.6% fail on
Tyres
- 1.6% fail on Tread depth
-
1.6% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.6% fail on Registration plate