Citroen Relay MOT Results

Registered in 1998
36.2% pass rate
from 69 tests in 2017
(31% worse than other 1998 vans)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1998 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Relay is unusually good or bad.

  • 42% fail on Suspension (86% worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 32% fail on Prescribed areas (180% worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 19% fail on Component mounting (150% worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 13% fail on Spring mounting (2 times worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 10% fail on Subframe mounting (3 times worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 7.2% fail on Front suspension joints (2 times worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 5.8% fail on Drive shafts
      • 5.8% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 5.8% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 4.3% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 4.3% fail on Rear (6 times worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Front
    • 4.3% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 4.3% fail on Condition
    • 2.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.4% fail on Attachment
  • 38% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 12% fail on Direction indicators (2 times worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 10% fail on Flashing type (170% worse than other 1998 vans)
        • 5.8% fail on Individual lamps
        • 2.9% fail on Side repeaters
        • 1.4% fail on All direction indicators
      • 1.4% fail on Semaphore
        • 1.4% fail on Switch
    • 8.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.8% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.9% fail on Rear lamps
    • 8.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 7.2% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 5.8% fail on Horn
    • 4.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.3% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.4% fail on Battery
    • 1.4% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 1.4% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 29% fail on Brakes
    • 17% fail on Brake performance
      • 10% fail on Front wheels
      • 8.7% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 7.2% fail on Service brake performance
      • 5.8% fail on Rear wheels
    • 14% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 13% fail on Components
        • 12% fail on Pipes
        • 1.4% fail on Hoses
        • 1.4% fail on Valves
      • 1.4% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 1.4% fail on Leaks
    • 1.4% fail on Hub components
      • 1.4% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.4% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.4% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
  • 20% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (150% worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 10% fail on Body condition
    • 5.8% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 5.8% fail on Chassis
    • 2.9% fail on Doors
      • 2.9% fail on Passenger entrance/exit doors (Class 5) (286 times worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Seats
      • 1.4% fail on Drivers
  • 14% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 8.7% fail on Washers
    • 5.8% fail on Wipers
    • 1.4% fail on Windscreen
  • 12% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 10% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.4% fail on Emissions
    • 1.4% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.4% fail on System
    • 1.4% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 7.2% fail on Steering
    • 4.3% fail on Steering system
      • 2.9% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.4% fail on Steering rack
    • 2.9% fail on Power steering
      • 2.9% fail on Operation (5 times worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Steering operation
  • 7.2% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 7.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 4.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.4% fail on Requirements
      • 1.4% fail on Condition
  • 4.3% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 4.3% fail on Registration plate
  • 2.9% fail on Tyres
    • 1.4% fail on Condition
    • 1.4% fail on Tread depth