Citroen Relay MOT Results

Registered in 1998
52.1% pass rate
from 73 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1998 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Relay is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Suspension
    • 14% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 5.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 1.4% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 4.1% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 4.1% fail on Springs
      • 2.7% fail on Leaf springs
        • 2.7% fail on Leaf spring (10 times worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.1% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.4% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.4% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.4% fail on Other suspension component
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint
  • 18% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 12% fail on Integral vehicle structure (3 times worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 12% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (3 times worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Sub-frame
        • 1.4% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 5.5% fail on Transmission
      • 5.5% fail on Drive shafts
        • 5.5% fail on Joints
    • 2.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.4% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.4% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 1.4% fail on Towbar
      • 1.4% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 1.4% fail on Doors
      • 1.4% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 1.4% fail on Door condition
    • 1.4% fail on Seats
      • 1.4% fail on Driver's seat
  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.5% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 4.1% fail on Horn
      • 1.4% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.4% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.4% fail on Side repeaters
  • 14% fail on Brakes
    • 6.8% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 4.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 4.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 2.7% fail on Service brake performance
      • 4.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 4.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
    • 5.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.7% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 1998 vans)
        • 2.7% fail on Other braking system component (16 times worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 1.4% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 1.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.4% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.4% fail on Brake discs
  • 9.6% fail on Visibility
    • 4.1% fail on Washers
    • 2.7% fail on View to rear
      • 2.7% fail on Mirrors
    • 2.7% fail on Wipers
    • 1.4% fail on Condition of glass
      • 1.4% fail on Windscreen
  • 5.5% fail on Tyres
    • 2.7% fail on Size/type (10 times worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Condition
  • 1.4% fail on Steering
    • 1.4% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.4% fail on Track rod end
  • 1.4% fail on Road Wheels
    • 1.4% fail on Attachment