MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Citroen » Relay » 2000
Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Citroen Relay MOT Results

Registered in 2000
51.1% pass rate
from 182 tests in 2020
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Relay is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Suspension
    • 16% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (82% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Sub-frames (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 4.4% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 3.8% fail on Springs
      • 3.8% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.7% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.55% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.1% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.55% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.55% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 1.1% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.55% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.55% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.55% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.55% fail on Suspension unit
  • 24% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.9% fail on Headlamp
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp levelling device (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 5.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.55% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 5.5% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 5.5% fail on Horn
      • 0.55% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 3.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.3% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.6% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.1% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.55% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.55% fail on Switch
    • 1.1% fail on Outline marker lamps
      • 1.1% fail on Outline marker lamp
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.55% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.55% fail on Switch
    • 0.55% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 24% fail on Brakes
    • 16% fail on Brake performance
      • 8.8% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 8.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 4.9% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 4.4% fail on Service brake performance
      • 8.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 8.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 7.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 7.1% fail on Rbt
          • 6.0% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.7% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.7% fail on Rbt
          • 2.2% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.55% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 2.2% fail on Brake performance not tested (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 9.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes (100% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.6% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.6% fail on Brake discs
      • 1.1% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.1% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.1% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.55% fail on Pedal
      • 0.55% fail on Hand lever
    • 1.1% fail on Air and vacuum systems (13 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Servos (20 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 1.1% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.55% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
        • 0.55% fail on Other braking system component
    • 0.55% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.55% fail on Lever
    • 0.55% fail on Load sensing valves
  • 20% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 4.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 4.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 4.9% fail on Transmission
      • 4.9% fail on Drive shafts
        • 4.9% fail on Joints
    • 3.8% fail on Chassis
      • 3.3% fail on Chassis condition
      • 0.55% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 1.1% fail on Body
      • 0.55% fail on Body condition
      • 0.55% fail on Panel
    • 0.55% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.55% fail on Tank
    • 0.55% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.55% fail on Cabs
      • 0.55% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 8.2% fail on Visibility
    • 5.5% fail on Wipers
    • 3.8% fail on Washers
    • 0.55% fail on Bonnet
  • 4.4% fail on Steering
    • 2.2% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.2% fail on Track rod end
    • 1.1% fail on Power steering
      • 0.55% fail on Operation
      • 0.55% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.55% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.55% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.55% fail on Steering play
      • 0.55% fail on Steering rack
  • 3.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.7% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.55% fail on Condition
  • 3.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.2% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.2% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.55% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.55% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
    • 1.1% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.1% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 2.2% fail on Tyres
    • 1.1% fail on Condition
    • 1.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.55% fail on Size/type
  • 0.55% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.55% fail on Registration plates