MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Citroen » Relay » 2000

Citroen Relay MOT Results

Registered in 2000
39.0% pass rate
from 269 tests in 2017
(22% worse than other 2000 vans)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Relay is unusually good or bad.

  • 36% fail on Suspension (53% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 28% fail on Prescribed areas (150% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 13% fail on Spring mounting (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 12% fail on Component mounting (76% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 12% fail on Subframe mounting (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 5.6% fail on Wheel bearings (160% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 3.3% fail on Front
      • 2.6% fail on Rear (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 4.8% fail on Drive shafts
      • 4.8% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 4.8% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 4.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.5% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.1% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.74% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.74% fail on Condition
    • 0.37% fail on Leaf springs
      • 0.37% fail on Shackle bracket
    • 0.37% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.37% fail on Condition
  • 34% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 13% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 7.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.8% fail on Front lamps
      • 3.0% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.37% fail on All position lamps
    • 7.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 6.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 6.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 4.1% fail on Individual lamps
        • 1.9% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.74% fail on All direction indicators
    • 5.9% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.8% fail on Horn
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.9% fail on Battery
    • 1.5% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.74% fail on Switch
      • 0.37% fail on Lamp
      • 0.37% fail on Tell tale
    • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (74% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.74% fail on Fog lamp (82% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.37% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.37% fail on Switch
    • 0.74% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 28% fail on Brakes (31% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 17% fail on Hydraulic systems (65% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 16% fail on Components (72% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 14% fail on Pipes (160% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 2.2% fail on Hoses
        • 1.9% fail on Valves
        • 0.37% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.37% fail on Servos
        • 0.37% fail on Pump
      • 0.37% fail on Operation
      • 0.37% fail on Leaks
    • 15% fail on Brake performance
      • 7.4% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 6.3% fail on Rear wheels
      • 5.9% fail on Front wheels
      • 3.0% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.5% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 1.5% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.74% fail on Cable
      • 0.37% fail on Linkage
      • 0.37% fail on Pivot
    • 1.5% fail on Hub components
      • 0.37% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.37% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.37% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.37% fail on Brake calipers
    • 0.74% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.74% fail on Pedal
        • 0.37% fail on Condition
        • 0.37% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.37% fail on Restricted movement
  • 20% fail on Driver's view of the road (72% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 12% fail on Wipers (95% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 8.9% fail on Washers (86% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.74% fail on Windscreen
  • 12% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 8.9% fail on Body condition (99% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 3.7% fail on Chassis
    • 0.74% fail on Seats
      • 0.37% fail on Passengers
      • 0.37% fail on Drivers
    • 0.37% fail on Body security
  • 8.9% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 8.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.37% fail on Emissions
    • 0.37% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.37% fail on System
    • 0.37% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 7.1% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 7.1% fail on Seat belts
      • 5.6% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.5% fail on Condition
  • 5.9% fail on Steering
    • 4.1% fail on Steering system
      • 3.7% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.37% fail on Steering rack
    • 1.5% fail on Steering operation (7 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.37% fail on Power steering
      • 0.37% fail on Operation
    • 0.37% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 5.9% fail on Tyres
    • 4.1% fail on Condition
    • 2.2% fail on Tread depth
  • 0.74% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.74% fail on Registration plate