Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Citroen Relay MOT Results

Registered in 2002
49.0% pass rate
from 555 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Relay is unusually good or bad.

  • 28% fail on Suspension (32% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 17% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (140% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.2% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 2.0% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.6% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 4.9% fail on Springs
      • 4.0% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.90% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.36% fail on Leaf spring
        • 0.36% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
        • 0.18% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
      • 0.18% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.18% fail on Coil spring
    • 4.3% fail on Sub-frames (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 4.1% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Sub-frame
    • 4.1% fail on Shock absorbers (180% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.8% fail on Other suspension component
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.54% fail on Other suspension component (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Macpherson strut (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.36% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.36% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.72% fail on Anti-roll bars (84% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Linkage
      • 0.18% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 0.18% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.18% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 26% fail on Brakes (30% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 19% fail on Brake performance (56% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 12% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (93% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 11% fail on Rbt (sp) (93% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.18% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 7.0% fail on Service brake performance
        • 6.8% fail on Rbt
          • 5.8% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.18% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.18% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 6.8% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 6.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 4.7% fail on Service brake performance
          • 3.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt
          • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.36% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.72% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.2% fail on Load sensing valves (95% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.90% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.36% fail on Brake linings (13 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.36% fail on Cable
      • 0.18% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.18% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.6% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Other braking system component (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.36% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
        • 0.18% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
      • 0.18% fail on Additional braking device
    • 0.90% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.90% fail on Lever
    • 0.72% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.54% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.36% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.18% fail on Pedal
    • 0.36% fail on Air and vacuum systems (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Leaks
      • 0.18% fail on Valves
    • 0.36% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.36% fail on Valves
      • 0.18% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.36% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.36% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.18% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.18% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 23% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.6% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.72% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 5.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 5.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 4.0% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.90% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.36% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.18% fail on Switch
    • 4.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.36% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.9% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 2.7% fail on Horn
      • 1.4% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.90% fail on Electrical wiring (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.3% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.0% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.18% fail on Switch
    • 0.36% fail on Outline marker lamps
      • 0.36% fail on Outline marker lamp
    • 0.36% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.36% fail on Switch
    • 0.18% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 20% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 7.6% fail on Transmission (51% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 7.2% fail on Drive shafts (88% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 6.8% fail on Joints (81% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.18% fail on Flexible couplings
        • 0.18% fail on Bearing housing
      • 0.36% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.36% fail on Joints
    • 5.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure (120% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 5.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (130% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.2% fail on Chassis (74% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 5.2% fail on Chassis condition (75% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 2.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.4% fail on Body
      • 0.90% fail on Panel
      • 0.54% fail on Other body component
    • 1.3% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.72% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.54% fail on Pipe
    • 0.54% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.54% fail on Carrier (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.36% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.18% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.18% fail on Bracket
    • 0.36% fail on Doors
      • 0.18% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.18% fail on Door condition
      • 0.18% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.18% fail on Door condition
    • 0.36% fail on Floor
    • 0.36% fail on Cabs
      • 0.18% fail on Steps
      • 0.18% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.18% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.18% fail on Towbar
      • 0.18% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.18% fail on Seats
      • 0.18% fail on Driver's seat
  • 11% fail on Visibility
    • 7.2% fail on Wipers
    • 4.9% fail on Washers
    • 0.90% fail on View to rear
      • 0.90% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.36% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.36% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.36% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.36% fail on Windscreen
  • 5.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 5.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 4.5% fail on Prescribed areas (76% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.72% fail on Condition
      • 0.18% fail on Attachment
  • 4.5% fail on Steering
    • 2.9% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.7% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.18% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.90% fail on Power steering
      • 0.54% fail on Operation
      • 0.54% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.36% fail on Other components
    • 0.72% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.72% fail on Steering rack
  • 4.5% fail on Tyres
    • 2.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.3% fail on Condition
  • 3.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.3% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.3% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.54% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.18% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.18% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.18% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.18% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 0.18% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.18% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 1.1% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.90% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.18% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 1.1% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.36% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.36% fail on Attachment
  • 0.18% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.18% fail on Speed limiter
      • 0.18% fail on Speed limiter plate
  • 0.18% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests
    • 0.18% fail on Doors
      • 0.18% fail on Emergency exits