Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Citroen Relay MOT Results

Registered in 2002
46.7% pass rate
from 873 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Relay is unusually good or bad.

  • 35% fail on Suspension (41% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 26% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 15% fail on Spring mounting (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 12% fail on Component mounting (140% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 8.5% fail on Subframe mounting (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 9.3% fail on Drive shafts (100% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 9.2% fail on Front drive shafts (100% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 9.0% fail on Constant velocity joints (100% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.11% fail on Couplings
      • 0.11% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.11% fail on Drive shafts
    • 5.0% fail on Shock absorbers (170% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 5.0% fail on Condition (170% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.23% fail on Attachment
    • 3.0% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 2.2% fail on Front
      • 0.92% fail on Rear
    • 2.2% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.3% fail on Anti-roll bars (73% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.57% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (80% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.57% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment
    • 1.1% fail on Leaf springs
      • 0.34% fail on Condition
      • 0.34% fail on Anchor bracket
      • 0.34% fail on Shackle bracket (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Pins and bushes
        • 0.11% fail on Shackle
    • 0.23% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.23% fail on Condition
    • 0.11% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
    • 0.11% fail on Air suspension
      • 0.11% fail on Bellows
    • 0.11% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
  • 27% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 6.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.8% fail on Rear lamps
      • 3.2% fail on Front lamps (44% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 6.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 6.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 6.0% fail on Registration plate lamp (43% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.8% fail on Headlamp (46% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.11% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
      • 0.11% fail on Switch
    • 4.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.9% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.57% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.34% fail on All direction indicators
    • 3.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 3.0% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.57% fail on Tell tale
    • 2.5% fail on Horn
    • 1.9% fail on Battery
    • 0.69% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.46% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.23% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.11% fail on Lamp
      • 0.11% fail on Switch
    • 0.34% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.34% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.34% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 27% fail on Brakes (21% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 20% fail on Brake performance (53% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 13% fail on Parking brake performance (95% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 6.9% fail on Rear wheels
      • 6.6% fail on Front wheels (53% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 5.7% fail on Service brake performance (84% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Brake imbalance (110% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 11% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 11% fail on Components
        • 4.6% fail on Pipes
        • 4.6% fail on Valves
        • 2.6% fail on Hoses (80% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.11% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.11% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.11% fail on Servos
      • 0.34% fail on Leaks
      • 0.11% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 2.6% fail on Parking brake (76% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Condition (76% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Hub components
      • 1.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.46% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.11% fail on Brake back plates
      • 0.11% fail on Brake calipers
    • 0.80% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.57% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
      • 0.23% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
    • 0.57% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.57% fail on Pedal
        • 0.46% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.11% fail on Condition
    • 0.57% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.46% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.46% fail on Cable
    • 0.34% fail on ABS
    • 0.11% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.11% fail on Components
        • 0.11% fail on Valves
  • 14% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (82% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 7.7% fail on Body condition (94% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 6.1% fail on Vehicle structure (160% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 6.1% fail on Chassis (160% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Doors
      • 0.69% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.23% fail on Emergency exits
      • 0.23% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.34% fail on Speedometer (7 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.23% fail on Seats
      • 0.23% fail on Passengers
    • 0.11% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.11% fail on Body security
  • 12% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.9% fail on Wipers
    • 4.8% fail on Washers
    • 1.1% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.69% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.46% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.11% fail on Glazing
      • 0.11% fail on Glazing/screen/partition
  • 6.8% fail on Tyres
    • 3.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.46% fail on Size/type
    • 0.11% fail on Valve stem
  • 6.4% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 6.3% fail on Seat belts (51% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 5.2% fail on Prescribed areas (66% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.80% fail on Condition
      • 0.46% fail on Attachment (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.23% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (82% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (81% better than other 2002 vans)
  • 6.0% fail on Steering
    • 4.0% fail on Steering system (38% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.9% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.69% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.34% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.23% fail on Free play
        • 0.23% fail on Steering rack
    • 1.4% fail on Power steering
      • 0.80% fail on Operation
      • 0.34% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.11% fail on Drive system
      • 0.11% fail on Other components
    • 0.69% fail on Steering operation (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
  • 5.4% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 3.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.8% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.0% fail on System
      • 0.57% fail on Cap
      • 0.23% fail on Tank
    • 0.57% fail on Emissions (66% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.34% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 1.1% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plate
    • 0.11% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.92% fail on Towbars
    • 0.80% fail on Vehicle structure (200% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Towbar
  • 0.46% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.46% fail on Attachment