Citroen Relay MOT Results

Registered in 2003
44.7% pass rate
from 1,588 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Relay is unusually good or bad.

  • 35% fail on Suspension (37% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 23% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 13% fail on Spring mounting (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 11% fail on Component mounting (160% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 7.1% fail on Subframe mounting (5 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 10% fail on Drive shafts (100% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 10% fail on Front drive shafts (100% worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 10% fail on Constant velocity joints (100% worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.063% fail on Couplings
        • 0.063% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.13% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.13% fail on Drive shafts
    • 5.7% fail on Shock absorbers (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 5.7% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Wheel bearings (79% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 4.0% fail on Front (110% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Rear
    • 4.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.13% fail on Attachment
      • 0.063% fail on Condition
    • 2.6% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.4% fail on Leaf springs
      • 0.82% fail on Pins and bushes (140% worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.57% fail on Shackle
        • 0.19% fail on Anchor
        • 0.063% fail on Other pins and bushes
      • 0.44% fail on Condition
      • 0.13% fail on Spring eye
      • 0.063% fail on Anchor bracket
      • 0.063% fail on Securing bolts
    • 1.3% fail on Macpherson strut (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Anti-roll bars (82% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.63% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (84% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.13% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (93% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.063% fail on Condition
      • 0.063% fail on Attachment
    • 0.31% fail on Coil springs (89% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Condition (91% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.063% fail on Location
    • 0.25% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.19% fail on Condition
      • 0.063% fail on Attachment
    • 0.063% fail on General condition
  • 29% fail on Brakes (33% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 22% fail on Brake performance (72% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 13% fail on Parking brake performance (110% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 7.7% fail on Rear wheels (31% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 6.7% fail on Front wheels (62% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 6.4% fail on Service brake performance (120% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.13% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.063% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 9.9% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 9.7% fail on Components
        • 5.2% fail on Valves (81% worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 3.4% fail on Pipes (46% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 2.3% fail on Hoses (81% worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Servos (6 times worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.063% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.19% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.19% fail on Leaks
      • 0.13% fail on Operation
    • 3.1% fail on Hub components
      • 2.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.88% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.063% fail on Brake back plates
      • 0.063% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 1.5% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.5% fail on Condition
    • 1.2% fail on Mechanical components (140% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.94% fail on Cable (120% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Lever
      • 0.13% fail on Pivot (12 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.063% fail on Linkage
    • 0.82% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.82% fail on Pedal
        • 0.76% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.063% fail on Condition
    • 0.69% fail on Prescribed areas (130% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.50% fail on Actuating linkage mounting (3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
    • 0.63% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.31% fail on ABS
    • 0.13% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.063% fail on Components
        • 0.063% fail on Valves
      • 0.063% fail on Leaks
    • 0.063% fail on Additional braking devices
    • 0.063% fail on Full power hydraulic systems
      • 0.063% fail on Warning
  • 28% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (11% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 7.3% fail on Registration plate lamp (36% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 7.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 6.9% fail on Headlamps (70% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 6.8% fail on Headlamp (72% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.063% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.063% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.063% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.063% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 6.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.7% fail on Position lamps (34% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 3.8% fail on Front lamps (37% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.25% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.063% fail on Switch
    • 5.7% fail on Direction indicators (35% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 5.7% fail on Flashing type (35% worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 4.7% fail on Individual lamps (72% worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.76% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.31% fail on Side repeaters (72% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.063% fail on Tell tales
        • 0.063% fail on Switch
    • 2.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (37% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Fog lamp (36% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Tell tale
    • 1.8% fail on Horn
    • 1.4% fail on Battery
    • 0.38% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.38% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.31% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.13% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.063% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.063% fail on Lamp
  • 14% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (96% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 7.1% fail on Body condition (99% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 6.4% fail on Vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 6.4% fail on Chassis (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.38% fail on Doors (64% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.13% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.063% fail on Drivers
    • 0.25% fail on Spare wheel
    • 0.13% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.063% fail on Steps and stairs
      • 0.063% fail on Retractable steps
    • 0.063% fail on Body security
    • 0.063% fail on Seats
      • 0.063% fail on Drivers
  • 12% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.6% fail on Wipers
    • 4.5% fail on Washers
    • 1.2% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.76% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.31% fail on Bonnet
  • 6.4% fail on Tyres (27% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.1% fail on Condition (40% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.50% fail on Size/type
    • 0.25% fail on Valve stem
  • 6.0% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 6.0% fail on Seat belts (54% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 5.1% fail on Prescribed areas (76% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
      • 0.19% fail on Requirements
    • 0.13% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (93% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (92% better than other 2003 vans)
  • 5.2% fail on Steering (30% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Steering system (50% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Track rod end (46% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.50% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.25% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.063% fail on Other components
        • 0.063% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 1.1% fail on Power steering
      • 0.57% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.44% fail on Operation
      • 0.25% fail on Other components
    • 0.50% fail on Steering operation (190% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.31% fail on Steering control
      • 0.19% fail on Steering wheel
      • 0.13% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.13% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.063% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 3.8% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (46% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Exhaust system (62% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.69% fail on System
      • 0.31% fail on Tank
      • 0.25% fail on Cap
    • 0.82% fail on Emissions (54% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.38% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 1.3% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.44% fail on Towbars
    • 0.38% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.063% fail on Towbar
  • 0.19% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.19% fail on Attachment