MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Citroen » Relay » 2004
Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Citroen Relay MOT Results

Registered in 2004
43.4% pass rate
from 1,918 tests in 2017
(11% worse than other 2004 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Relay is unusually good or bad.

  • 37% fail on Suspension (51% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 24% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 13% fail on Spring mounting (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 11% fail on Component mounting (180% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 8.8% fail on Subframe mounting (8 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 12% fail on Drive shafts (170% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 12% fail on Front drive shafts (170% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 12% fail on Constant velocity joints (170% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.052% fail on Couplings
      • 0.26% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.26% fail on Drive shafts
    • 5.5% fail on Shock absorbers (180% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 5.5% fail on Condition (180% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.052% fail on Fitment
    • 4.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 3.9% fail on Wheel bearings (64% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 3.5% fail on Front (84% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.47% fail on Rear
    • 2.2% fail on Leaf springs (140% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Shackle (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.16% fail on Anchor
      • 0.52% fail on Condition
      • 0.16% fail on Anchor bracket
      • 0.052% fail on Shackle bracket
      • 0.052% fail on Securing bolts
    • 2.2% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.94% fail on Macpherson strut (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.94% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.68% fail on Anti-roll bars (90% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.42% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (90% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.052% fail on Condition
      • 0.052% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.052% fail on Attachment
      • 0.052% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.052% fail on Presence
    • 0.26% fail on Coil springs (90% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Condition (90% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.26% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.16% fail on Attachment
      • 0.10% fail on Condition
    • 0.16% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.16% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.10% fail on General condition
    • 0.10% fail on Axles
      • 0.052% fail on Axle beam
      • 0.052% fail on Clearance
    • 0.052% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.052% fail on Condition
    • 0.052% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.052% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.052% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 29% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 7.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 6.8% fail on Registration plate lamp (40% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 6.7% fail on Position lamps (22% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 3.5% fail on Front lamps (43% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 3.4% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.26% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.052% fail on Switch
    • 6.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 6.3% fail on Headlamps (63% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 6.2% fail on Headlamp (64% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.10% fail on Headlamp levelling device (8 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 5.9% fail on Direction indicators (45% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 5.9% fail on Flashing type (45% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 4.7% fail on Individual lamps (76% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.99% fail on All direction indicators (100% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.31% fail on Side repeaters (70% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.052% fail on Switch
    • 2.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 2.0% fail on Fog lamp (35% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.052% fail on Switch
    • 1.9% fail on Horn
    • 1.8% fail on Battery
    • 0.42% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.36% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.31% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.10% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.052% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.052% fail on Lamp
  • 29% fail on Brakes (40% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 22% fail on Brake performance (87% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 13% fail on Parking brake performance (110% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 7.6% fail on Rear wheels (38% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 7.2% fail on Front wheels (120% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 5.8% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Brake imbalance (98% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.052% fail on Brake operation
    • 9.1% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 8.7% fail on Components
        • 4.4% fail on Valves (200% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 3.5% fail on Pipes (41% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Hoses
        • 0.052% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.052% fail on Pump
      • 0.52% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.26% fail on Leaks
      • 0.10% fail on Operation
    • 2.1% fail on Hub components (34% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Brake pads (44% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.78% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.10% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.052% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.052% fail on Brake drums
    • 1.7% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.7% fail on Condition
    • 1.1% fail on ABS
    • 0.94% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.94% fail on Pedal
        • 0.78% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.16% fail on Condition
    • 0.89% fail on Restricted movement (180% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.78% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.57% fail on Actuating linkage mounting (19 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
      • 0.052% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
    • 0.63% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.52% fail on Cable
      • 0.052% fail on Linkage
      • 0.052% fail on Pivot
    • 0.21% fail on Air and vacuum systems (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Components (4 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.052% fail on Hoses
        • 0.052% fail on Servos
        • 0.052% fail on Valves
      • 0.052% fail on Warning
  • 14% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (130% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 8.7% fail on Body condition (150% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 6.2% fail on Vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 6.2% fail on Chassis (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.21% fail on Doors (74% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.052% fail on Drivers
      • 0.052% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.16% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.16% fail on Load security
      • 0.10% fail on Loading door
      • 0.052% fail on Access panel
    • 0.16% fail on Spare wheel
    • 0.10% fail on Seats
      • 0.10% fail on Drivers
    • 0.052% fail on Body security
  • 13% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 7.7% fail on Wipers
    • 5.0% fail on Washers
    • 1.0% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.78% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.26% fail on Bonnet
  • 6.1% fail on Tyres (28% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Tread depth (33% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Condition (38% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.57% fail on Size/type
    • 0.26% fail on Valve stem
  • 6.0% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 4.8% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.9% fail on Prescribed areas (37% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.68% fail on Condition
      • 0.21% fail on Requirements
      • 0.10% fail on Attachment
    • 1.4% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 1.1% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.21% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 4.4% fail on Steering (38% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 2.9% fail on Steering system (51% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Track rod end (48% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.42% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.26% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.10% fail on Other components
        • 0.10% fail on Steering component (11 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.73% fail on Steering operation (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.73% fail on Power steering
      • 0.31% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.16% fail on Drive system (5 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Operation
      • 0.10% fail on Other components
      • 0.052% fail on Rams
    • 0.16% fail on Steering control
      • 0.052% fail on Steering lock
      • 0.052% fail on Steering wheel
      • 0.052% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.052% fail on Universal joint
  • 4.2% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (34% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Exhaust system (52% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.52% fail on System
      • 0.42% fail on Cap
      • 0.26% fail on Tank
      • 0.10% fail on Pipe
    • 1.1% fail on Emissions
    • 0.36% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 1.2% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate
    • 0.052% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.42% fail on Towbars
    • 0.36% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.052% fail on Towbar
  • 0.31% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.26% fail on Attachment
    • 0.052% fail on Condition