Citroen Relay MOT Results
Registered in 200443.4% pass rate
from 1,918 tests in 2017
(11% worse than other 2004 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Relay is unusually good or bad.
-
37% fail on
Suspension
(51% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
24% fail on
Prescribed areas
(2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 13% fail on Spring mounting (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 11% fail on Component mounting (180% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 8.8% fail on Subframe mounting (8 times worse than other 2004 vans)
-
12% fail on
Drive shafts
(170% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
12% fail on
Front drive shafts
(170% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 12% fail on Constant velocity joints (170% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.052% fail on Couplings
-
0.26% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.26% fail on Drive shafts
-
12% fail on
Front drive shafts
(170% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
5.5% fail on
Shock absorbers
(180% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 5.5% fail on Condition (180% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.052% fail on Fitment
-
4.6% fail on
Suspension arms
- 4.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
3.9% fail on
Wheel bearings
(64% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 3.5% fail on Front (84% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.47% fail on Rear
-
2.2% fail on
Leaf springs
(140% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
1.4% fail on
Pins and bushes
(3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Shackle (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.16% fail on Anchor
- 0.52% fail on Condition
- 0.16% fail on Anchor bracket
- 0.052% fail on Shackle bracket
- 0.052% fail on Securing bolts
-
1.4% fail on
Pins and bushes
(3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 2.2% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.94% fail on
Macpherson strut
(2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.94% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
-
0.68% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(90% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.42% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (90% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.052% fail on Condition
- 0.052% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.052% fail on Attachment
- 0.052% fail on Linkage condition
- 0.052% fail on Presence
-
0.26% fail on
Coil springs
(90% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.26% fail on Condition (90% better than other 2004 vans)
-
0.26% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.16% fail on Attachment
- 0.10% fail on Condition
-
0.16% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.16% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.10% fail on General condition
-
0.10% fail on
Axles
- 0.052% fail on Axle beam
- 0.052% fail on Clearance
-
0.052% fail on
Bonded suspension
- 0.052% fail on Condition
-
0.052% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.052% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.052% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
-
24% fail on
Prescribed areas
(2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
-
29% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 7.0% fail on Headlamp aim
- 6.8% fail on Registration plate lamp (40% better than other 2004 vans)
-
6.7% fail on
Position lamps
(22% better than other 2004 vans)
- 3.5% fail on Front lamps (43% better than other 2004 vans)
- 3.4% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.26% fail on All position lamps
- 0.052% fail on Switch
- 6.6% fail on Stop lamp
-
6.3% fail on
Headlamps
(63% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 6.2% fail on Headlamp (64% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
0.10% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
- 0.10% fail on Headlamp levelling device (8 times worse than other 2004 vans)
-
5.9% fail on
Direction indicators
(45% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
5.9% fail on
Flashing type
(45% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 4.7% fail on Individual lamps (76% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.99% fail on All direction indicators (100% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.31% fail on Side repeaters (70% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.052% fail on Switch
-
5.9% fail on
Flashing type
(45% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
2.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 2.0% fail on Fog lamp (35% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.21% fail on Tell tale
- 0.052% fail on Switch
- 1.9% fail on Horn
- 1.8% fail on Battery
- 0.42% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.36% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.31% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.10% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
0.052% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.052% fail on Lamp
-
29% fail on
Brakes
(40% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
22% fail on
Brake performance
(87% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 13% fail on Parking brake performance (110% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 7.6% fail on Rear wheels (38% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 7.2% fail on Front wheels (120% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 5.8% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 1.7% fail on Brake imbalance (98% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.36% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 0.052% fail on Brake operation
-
9.1% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
8.7% fail on
Components
- 4.4% fail on Valves (200% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 3.5% fail on Pipes (41% better than other 2004 vans)
- 1.5% fail on Hoses
- 0.052% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.052% fail on Pump
- 0.52% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.26% fail on Leaks
- 0.10% fail on Operation
-
8.7% fail on
Components
-
2.1% fail on
Hub components
(34% better than other 2004 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Brake pads (44% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.78% fail on Brake discs
- 0.10% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.052% fail on Brake linings
- 0.052% fail on Brake drums
-
1.7% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.7% fail on Condition
- 1.1% fail on ABS
-
0.94% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.94% fail on
Pedal
- 0.78% fail on Anti-slip
- 0.16% fail on Condition
-
0.94% fail on
Pedal
- 0.89% fail on Restricted movement (180% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
0.78% fail on
Prescribed areas
(3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.57% fail on Actuating linkage mounting (19 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.21% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
- 0.052% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
-
0.63% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.52% fail on Cable
- 0.052% fail on Linkage
- 0.052% fail on Pivot
-
0.21% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
(3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
-
0.16% fail on
Components
(4 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.052% fail on Hoses
- 0.052% fail on Servos
- 0.052% fail on Valves
- 0.052% fail on Warning
-
0.16% fail on
Components
(4 times worse than other 2004 vans)
-
22% fail on
Brake performance
(87% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
14% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(130% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 8.7% fail on Body condition (150% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
6.2% fail on
Vehicle structure
(2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 6.2% fail on Chassis (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
-
0.21% fail on
Doors
(74% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.10% fail on Passengers front
- 0.052% fail on Drivers
- 0.052% fail on Passengers other
- 0.16% fail on Engine mountings
-
0.16% fail on
Load security
- 0.10% fail on Loading door
- 0.052% fail on Access panel
- 0.16% fail on Spare wheel
-
0.10% fail on
Seats
- 0.10% fail on Drivers
- 0.052% fail on Body security
-
13% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 7.7% fail on Wipers
- 5.0% fail on Washers
- 1.0% fail on Mirrors
- 0.78% fail on Windscreen
- 0.26% fail on Bonnet
-
6.1% fail on
Tyres
(28% better than other 2004 vans)
- 3.4% fail on Tread depth (33% better than other 2004 vans)
- 2.2% fail on Condition (38% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.57% fail on Size/type
- 0.26% fail on Valve stem
-
6.0% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
4.8% fail on
Seat belts
- 3.9% fail on Prescribed areas (37% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.68% fail on Condition
- 0.21% fail on Requirements
- 0.10% fail on Attachment
-
1.4% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 1.1% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
- 0.21% fail on Drivers airbag
-
4.8% fail on
Seat belts
-
4.4% fail on
Steering
(38% better than other 2004 vans)
-
2.9% fail on
Steering system
(51% better than other 2004 vans)
- 2.1% fail on Track rod end (48% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.42% fail on Steering rack
- 0.26% fail on Ball joint
-
0.10% fail on
Other components
- 0.10% fail on Steering component (11 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.73% fail on Steering operation (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
-
0.73% fail on
Power steering
- 0.31% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.16% fail on Drive system (5 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.10% fail on Operation
- 0.10% fail on Other components
- 0.052% fail on Rams
-
0.16% fail on
Steering control
- 0.052% fail on Steering lock
- 0.052% fail on Steering wheel
-
0.052% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.052% fail on Universal joint
-
2.9% fail on
Steering system
(51% better than other 2004 vans)
-
4.2% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(34% better than other 2004 vans)
- 1.9% fail on Exhaust system (52% better than other 2004 vans)
-
1.2% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.52% fail on System
- 0.42% fail on Cap
- 0.26% fail on Tank
- 0.10% fail on Pipe
- 1.1% fail on Emissions
- 0.36% fail on Emissions not tested
-
1.2% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.1% fail on Registration plate
- 0.052% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
-
0.42% fail on
Towbars
- 0.36% fail on Vehicle structure
- 0.052% fail on Towbar
-
0.31% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.26% fail on Attachment
- 0.052% fail on Condition