Citroen Relay MOT Results

Registered in 2005
45.5% pass rate
from 2,337 tests in 2017
(9.4% worse than other 2005 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Relay is unusually good or bad.

  • 34% fail on Suspension (48% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 17% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 10.0% fail on Spring mounting (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 6.6% fail on Component mounting (150% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 5.4% fail on Subframe mounting (8 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 14% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 14% fail on Front drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 14% fail on Constant velocity joints (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Couplings (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.13% fail on Drive shafts
    • 6.0% fail on Shock absorbers (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 5.9% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.043% fail on Fitment
    • 4.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.17% fail on Attachment
    • 3.8% fail on Wheel bearings (68% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.5% fail on Front (91% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Rear
    • 2.7% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 2.4% fail on Leaf springs (150% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Shackle (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.26% fail on Anchor (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.043% fail on Other pins and bushes
      • 0.43% fail on Condition
      • 0.26% fail on Anchor bracket (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Spring eye
      • 0.043% fail on Shackle bracket
      • 0.043% fail on Securing bolts
    • 1.2% fail on Anti-roll bars (82% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.68% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (83% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.17% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (90% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.043% fail on Condition
    • 0.98% fail on Macpherson strut (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.98% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.56% fail on Coil springs (81% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Location (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Condition (91% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.30% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.21% fail on Condition
      • 0.086% fail on Attachment
    • 0.086% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.086% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.043% fail on General condition
    • 0.043% fail on Fluid suspension
      • 0.043% fail on Suspension unit
    • 0.043% fail on Axles
      • 0.043% fail on Axle beam
  • 28% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 7.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 7.4% fail on Registration plate lamp (30% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 7.3% fail on Direction indicators (90% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 7.3% fail on Flashing type (90% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 5.9% fail on Individual lamps (130% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on All direction indicators (140% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.21% fail on Side repeaters (78% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.043% fail on Switch
    • 6.9% fail on Position lamps (18% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.8% fail on Rear lamps (37% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.5% fail on Front lamps (42% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.086% fail on All position lamps
    • 6.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 6.5% fail on Headlamps (72% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 6.5% fail on Headlamp (76% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.043% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.043% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 2.1% fail on Battery (73% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (31% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Fog lamp (34% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.043% fail on Switch
    • 0.90% fail on Horn (48% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.43% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.43% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (160% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.21% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.17% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 25% fail on Brakes (33% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 18% fail on Brake performance (69% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 9.9% fail on Parking brake performance (72% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 6.5% fail on Rear wheels (31% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 6.1% fail on Front wheels (110% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 4.2% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Brake imbalance (89% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.13% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 7.8% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 7.2% fail on Components
        • 3.6% fail on Valves (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 2.3% fail on Pipes (57% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Hoses (78% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.086% fail on Cylinders
      • 0.68% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (120% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Operation
      • 0.086% fail on Leaks
    • 2.1% fail on Hub components (33% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.60% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.043% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.043% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 2.1% fail on ABS
    • 1.8% fail on Parking brake (50% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Condition (51% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Service brake control components (68% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Pedal (68% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.98% fail on Anti-slip (80% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Condition
    • 0.64% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Actuating linkage mounting (13 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.60% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.51% fail on Cable
      • 0.043% fail on Brake slack adjuster
      • 0.043% fail on Clevis joint
    • 0.43% fail on Restricted movement
  • 12% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 7.9% fail on Wipers (27% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Washers
    • 0.98% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.94% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.26% fail on Bonnet
  • 11% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (100% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 6.2% fail on Body condition (130% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 4.4% fail on Chassis (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.47% fail on Seats
      • 0.34% fail on Drivers
      • 0.17% fail on Passengers
    • 0.30% fail on Doors (64% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.043% fail on Emergency exits
      • 0.043% fail on Drivers
      • 0.043% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.17% fail on Load security
      • 0.17% fail on Loading door (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.17% fail on Spare wheel
    • 0.13% fail on Body security
    • 0.086% fail on Engine mountings
  • 7.1% fail on Tyres
    • 4.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.9% fail on Condition
    • 0.30% fail on Size/type
    • 0.043% fail on Valve stem
  • 5.0% fail on Steering (22% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Steering system (31% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.60% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.30% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.13% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.77% fail on Power steering
      • 0.43% fail on Pipes and hoses (130% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Operation
      • 0.043% fail on Rams
    • 0.51% fail on Steering operation (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.17% fail on Steering control
      • 0.043% fail on Steering lock
      • 0.043% fail on Steering wheel
      • 0.043% fail on Steering column
      • 0.043% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.043% fail on Universal joint
  • 4.8% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 3.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.4% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.60% fail on System
      • 0.39% fail on Tank
      • 0.30% fail on Cap
      • 0.13% fail on Pipe
    • 0.43% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.21% fail on Emissions (83% better than other 2005 vans)
  • 4.5% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 3.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.64% fail on Condition
      • 0.13% fail on Attachment
      • 0.043% fail on Requirements
    • 1.7% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 1.6% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.086% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.81% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.81% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.47% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.39% fail on Attachment
    • 0.086% fail on Condition
  • 0.21% fail on Towbars
    • 0.17% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.043% fail on Towbar