MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Citroen » Relay » 2009

Citroen Relay MOT Results

Registered in 2009
56.2% pass rate
from 2,026 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Relay is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (16% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 7.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (42% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 7.2% fail on Headlamp aim (79% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 6.9% fail on Headlamp aim (83% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.49% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 6.3% fail on Direction indicators (150% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 6.3% fail on Flashing type (150% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 4.1% fail on Side repeaters (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 2.7% fail on Individual direction indicators (57% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on All direction indicators
    • 5.4% fail on Headlamps (62% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 4.8% fail on Headlamp (50% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.69% fail on Headlamp levelling device (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.049% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 4.9% fail on Stop lamp (26% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (70% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 3.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (70% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 3.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (67% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.099% fail on Switch
    • 2.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.7% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.049% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.84% fail on Outline marker lamps
      • 0.74% fail on Outline marker lamp
      • 0.15% fail on All outline marker lamps
    • 0.79% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.49% fail on Horn
      • 0.20% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.15% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.49% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.49% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.25% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 19% fail on Brakes (30% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 17% fail on Brake performance (120% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 14% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (170% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 14% fail on Rbt (sp) (170% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.099% fail on Plate brake tester (sp) (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.049% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 3.9% fail on Parking brake performance (89% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 3.8% fail on Rbt (88% worse than other 2009 vans)
          • 3.3% fail on Parking brake performance (83% worse than other 2009 vans)
          • 0.39% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.25% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (5 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.099% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.049% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.049% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.049% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.049% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 3.4% fail on Service brake performance (46% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 3.4% fail on Rbt (46% worse than other 2009 vans)
          • 2.7% fail on Service brake performance (49% worse than other 2009 vans)
          • 0.74% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.049% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.049% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.6% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (69% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (73% worse than other 2009 vans)
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance (130% worse than other 2009 vans)
          • 0.44% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.099% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.89% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.44% fail on Cable
        • 0.25% fail on Linkage (8 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Lever
        • 0.15% fail on Pivot (6 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.049% fail on Brake slack adjuster
      • 0.79% fail on Brake discs and drums (47% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.79% fail on Brake discs (47% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.94% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.94% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.74% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.39% fail on Pedal
      • 0.35% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.69% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.69% fail on Lever
    • 0.15% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.049% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.049% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.049% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 14% fail on Suspension
    • 7.0% fail on Suspension arms (41% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 3.5% fail on Pins and bushes (91% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 3.1% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.99% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.049% fail on Suspension arm
    • 2.9% fail on Shock absorbers (170% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Springs (43% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Coil springs (49% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Coil spring (49% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.64% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.25% fail on Leaf spring (79% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.20% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
    • 1.8% fail on Other suspension component (190% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Ball joint dust cover (170% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.049% fail on Other suspension component
    • 1.0% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.64% fail on Anti-roll bars (89% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.049% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.049% fail on Linkage
      • 0.049% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 0.35% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.15% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension (7 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.099% fail on Operation (16 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.049% fail on Suspension unit
    • 0.099% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.099% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 9.7% fail on Visibility
    • 5.3% fail on Washers (36% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.2% fail on Wipers
    • 1.4% fail on View to rear
      • 1.4% fail on Mirrors (65% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.59% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.54% fail on Windscreen
      • 0.049% fail on Window
    • 0.20% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.049% fail on Driver's view
  • 9.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (33% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 8.9% fail on Exhaust emissions (33% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 7.6% fail on Compression ignition (39% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 4.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (68% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 2.9% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.89% fail on Emissions not tested (130% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.099% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.049% fail on Particulate filter
          • 0.049% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve
        • 0.049% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 1.5% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.099% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.69% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.59% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.099% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.049% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.049% fail on Sound deadening material
  • 8.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.2% fail on Exhaust system (130% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Transmission (34% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.3% fail on Joints
        • 0.049% fail on Drive shaft
        • 0.049% fail on Bearing housing
      • 0.099% fail on Prop shafts (79% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.099% fail on Joints
    • 1.8% fail on Body (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Other body component (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Panel
    • 0.64% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.30% fail on System (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.099% fail on Pipe
    • 0.39% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.20% fail on Chassis
      • 0.20% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.20% fail on Doors
      • 0.20% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.15% fail on Door condition
        • 0.049% fail on Hinge
    • 0.20% fail on Seats
      • 0.15% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.049% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.15% fail on Load security
      • 0.15% fail on Loading door (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.099% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.099% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.049% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.049% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.049% fail on Floor
  • 4.7% fail on Tyres (25% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth (33% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Condition
    • 0.54% fail on Size/type (140% worse than other 2009 vans)
  • 2.0% fail on Steering (58% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Steering linkage components (65% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Track rod end (68% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.049% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.049% fail on Rear wheel steering
        • 0.049% fail on Components
    • 0.44% fail on Power steering
      • 0.35% fail on Other components (180% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.049% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.049% fail on Pump
    • 0.35% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.30% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.049% fail on Operation
    • 0.049% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 1.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.1% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.49% fail on Seat belts (63% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Condition
      • 0.099% fail on Prescribed areas (83% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.099% fail on Requirements
  • 0.59% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.59% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.44% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.39% fail on Attachment
    • 0.049% fail on Condition
  • 0.049% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests
    • 0.049% fail on Doors
      • 0.049% fail on Emergency exits