Citroen Relay MOT Results

Registered in 2010
55.0% pass rate
from 2,655 tests in 2020
(6.5% worse than other 2010 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Relay is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (24% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 8.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (46% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 8.1% fail on Headlamp aim (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 7.7% fail on Headlamp aim (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.49% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 5.8% fail on Direction indicators (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 5.8% fail on Flashing type (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 3.1% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 2.8% fail on Individual direction indicators (56% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.26% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.038% fail on Switch
    • 5.7% fail on Headlamps (69% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 5.0% fail on Headlamp (54% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.68% fail on Headlamp levelling device (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.038% fail on Matched pair
      • 0.038% fail on Dipswitch
    • 4.7% fail on Stop lamp (23% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (54% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (55% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 2.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (54% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.038% fail on Switch
    • 2.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.7% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.038% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.038% fail on Switch
    • 0.87% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.83% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.038% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.83% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.49% fail on Horn
      • 0.23% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.11% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.34% fail on Outline marker lamps
      • 0.23% fail on All outline marker lamps (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Outline marker lamp
    • 0.15% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.075% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.075% fail on Switch
  • 20% fail on Brakes (52% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 16% fail on Brake performance (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 14% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 14% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.075% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 4.6% fail on Parking brake performance (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 4.5% fail on Rbt (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 3.7% fail on Parking brake performance (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.83% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.11% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.038% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.038% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.038% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.038% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 3.5% fail on Service brake performance (81% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 3.4% fail on Rbt (81% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 2.8% fail on Service brake performance (94% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.72% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.075% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.075% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.79% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.30% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.075% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.075% fail on Service brake imbalance (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 4.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 4.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.75% fail on Brake discs and drums (50% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.72% fail on Brake discs (52% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.038% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.72% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.41% fail on Cable
        • 0.19% fail on Pivot (14 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Linkage (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.038% fail on Relay lever
    • 1.0% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.0% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.94% fail on Parking brake control (78% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.94% fail on Lever (79% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.64% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.53% fail on Pedal
      • 0.15% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.26% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.23% fail on Rigid brake pipes (93% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.075% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.038% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.038% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.038% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.038% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 13% fail on Suspension
    • 7.9% fail on Suspension arms (80% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.1% fail on Ball joint (83% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.5% fail on Pins and bushes (98% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.038% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 2.4% fail on Shock absorbers (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Springs (41% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Coil springs (51% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Coil spring (54% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.075% fail on Mounting
      • 1.1% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.72% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.26% fail on Leaf spring (70% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.11% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
    • 1.1% fail on Other suspension component (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.87% fail on Ball joint (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.60% fail on Wheel bearings (56% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.38% fail on Anti-roll bars (93% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.038% fail on Linkage
    • 0.11% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.038% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.038% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.038% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.038% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.11% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.038% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.038% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.038% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.038% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.038% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.038% fail on Bellows
  • 11% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (80% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 10.0% fail on Exhaust emissions (84% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 7.9% fail on Compression ignition (77% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 5.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 2.3% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.72% fail on Emissions not tested (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.038% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.038% fail on Particulate filter
        • 0.038% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.038% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 2.4% fail on Spark ignition (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 2.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.075% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.075% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.038% fail on Non catalyst emissions
    • 0.94% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.72% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.23% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.038% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.038% fail on Sound deadening material
  • 9.2% fail on Visibility
    • 5.0% fail on Washers (39% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.2% fail on Wipers
    • 1.3% fail on View to rear (61% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Mirrors (62% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.79% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.79% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.15% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.11% fail on Driver's view
  • 7.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.1% fail on Exhaust system (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Transmission (61% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Drive shafts (59% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Joints (59% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.038% fail on Bearing housing
      • 0.075% fail on Prop shafts (79% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.075% fail on Joints
    • 1.3% fail on Body (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Other body component (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Panel
    • 0.34% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.11% fail on Tank
      • 0.075% fail on Pipe
      • 0.075% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.075% fail on System
    • 0.26% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.23% fail on Seats
      • 0.15% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.075% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.19% fail on Load security (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Loading door (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.15% fail on Doors
      • 0.075% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.075% fail on Door condition
      • 0.075% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.075% fail on Door condition
    • 0.11% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.075% fail on Carrier
      • 0.038% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.075% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.075% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.038% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.038% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.038% fail on Undertray
  • 4.7% fail on Tyres (22% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Tread depth (28% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Condition
    • 0.15% fail on Size/type
  • 2.0% fail on Steering (57% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.94% fail on Steering linkage components (76% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.87% fail on Track rod end (77% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.038% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.038% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.64% fail on Power steering
      • 0.23% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.19% fail on Other components
      • 0.11% fail on Rams (9 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.075% fail on Operation
      • 0.075% fail on Pump
    • 0.38% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.34% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.038% fail on Operation
    • 0.075% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.038% fail on Steering play
      • 0.038% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.038% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 2.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.1% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.87% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.79% fail on Condition
      • 0.038% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.038% fail on Requirements
  • 0.75% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.75% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.15% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.11% fail on Attachment
    • 0.038% fail on Condition