MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Citroen » Relay » 2010

Citroen Relay MOT Results

Registered in 2010
55.0% pass rate
from 2,359 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Relay is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (25% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 7.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (40% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 6.5% fail on Headlamps (83% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 5.6% fail on Headlamp (68% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.93% fail on Headlamp levelling device (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 6.2% fail on Direction indicators (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 6.2% fail on Flashing type (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 4.3% fail on Side repeaters (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 2.0% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.17% fail on All direction indicators
    • 6.2% fail on Headlamp aim (68% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 5.6% fail on Headlamp aim (67% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.72% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (95% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Stop lamp (28% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.9% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.0% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 1.0% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.81% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.55% fail on Horn
      • 0.13% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.13% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.30% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.25% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.042% fail on Switch
    • 0.25% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.042% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.042% fail on Switch
  • 19% fail on Brakes (28% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 15% fail on Brake performance (97% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 12% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 12% fail on Rbt (sp) (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.085% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.042% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 3.8% fail on Parking brake performance (97% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 3.7% fail on Rbt (97% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 3.2% fail on Parking brake performance (90% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.38% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.085% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.085% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.042% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.042% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.042% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.042% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 3.7% fail on Service brake performance (59% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 3.7% fail on Rbt (62% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 3.2% fail on Service brake performance (70% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.64% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.93% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.47% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.042% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.042% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.21% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.8% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.042% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.93% fail on Brake discs and drums (43% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.89% fail on Brake discs (45% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.042% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.68% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.42% fail on Cable
        • 0.17% fail on Pivot (16 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Lever
    • 1.3% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.3% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.042% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.68% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.68% fail on Lever
    • 0.51% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.34% fail on Pedal
      • 0.17% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.13% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.085% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.085% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.042% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.042% fail on Operation
    • 0.042% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.042% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.042% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.042% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
  • 13% fail on Suspension (26% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 8.5% fail on Suspension arms (47% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.4% fail on Pins and bushes (100% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.7% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.5% fail on Springs (47% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Coil springs (42% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Coil spring (41% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.85% fail on Leaf springs (52% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.51% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.21% fail on Leaf spring (85% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
        • 0.085% fail on Anchor bracket
      • 0.042% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.1% fail on Shock absorbers (88% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Other suspension component (80% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.93% fail on Ball joint (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.042% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.042% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.42% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (64% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.38% fail on Wheel bearings (77% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.38% fail on Anti-roll bars (94% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.042% fail on Linkage
    • 0.085% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.042% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.042% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.042% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.042% fail on Ball joint
  • 10% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (75% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 9.8% fail on Exhaust emissions (78% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 7.8% fail on Compression ignition (74% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 5.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 2.0% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 1.0% fail on Emissions not tested (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.13% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.085% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.042% fail on Catalytic converter
          • 0.042% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.042% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
      • 2.2% fail on Spark ignition (94% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 2.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.085% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.042% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.89% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.68% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.17% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.042% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 10% fail on Visibility (19% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.6% fail on Washers (32% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Wipers
    • 1.1% fail on View to rear
      • 1.1% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.042% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.64% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.64% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.17% fail on Bonnet
  • 8.4% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.9% fail on Exhaust system (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Transmission (46% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Drive shafts (43% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 2.0% fail on Joints (42% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Prop shafts (74% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Joints
    • 1.3% fail on Body (190% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.97% fail on Other body component (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Panel
      • 0.13% fail on Body condition (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.38% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.38% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.34% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.25% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.042% fail on Tank
      • 0.042% fail on System
    • 0.30% fail on Seats
      • 0.30% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.25% fail on Doors
      • 0.17% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.13% fail on Door condition
        • 0.042% fail on Catch
      • 0.085% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.085% fail on Door condition
    • 0.17% fail on Chassis
      • 0.17% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.17% fail on Load security (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Loading door (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.085% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.085% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.042% fail on Spare wheel condition
      • 0.042% fail on Carrier
    • 0.085% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.042% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.042% fail on Bracket
    • 0.042% fail on Towbar
      • 0.042% fail on Towbar condition
    • 0.042% fail on Floor
    • 0.042% fail on Cabs
      • 0.042% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.042% fail on Undertray
  • 4.8% fail on Tyres (22% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Condition
    • 2.3% fail on Tread depth (37% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.38% fail on Size/type
  • 2.5% fail on Steering (53% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Steering linkage components (69% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Track rod end (69% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.085% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.68% fail on Power steering
      • 0.38% fail on Other components (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.042% fail on Operation
      • 0.042% fail on Rams
    • 0.38% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.38% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.042% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.042% fail on Steering play
      • 0.042% fail on Steering rack
  • 2.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.3% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.76% fail on Seat belts (51% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.68% fail on Condition
      • 0.085% fail on Prescribed areas (89% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.042% fail on Requirements
    • 0.042% fail on Airbags
      • 0.042% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.55% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.55% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.17% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.13% fail on Attachment
    • 0.042% fail on Condition
  • 0.085% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests
    • 0.085% fail on Doors
      • 0.085% fail on Emergency exits