MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Citroen » Relay » 2012

Citroen Relay MOT Results

Registered in 2012
62.6% pass rate
from 3,162 tests in 2017
(8.8% worse than other 2012 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Relay is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (10% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 9.3% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 8.7% fail on Headlamp aim (98% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 5.5% fail on Direction indicators (120% worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 5.5% fail on Flashing type (120% worse than other 2012 vans)
        • 2.9% fail on Side repeaters (3 times worse than other 2012 vans)
        • 2.5% fail on Individual lamps (56% worse than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.44% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.032% fail on Tell tales
        • 0.032% fail on Switch
    • 4.8% fail on Headlamps (80% worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 4.8% fail on Headlamp (83% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Position lamps (58% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Front lamps (68% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.25% fail on All position lamps
    • 2.8% fail on Stop lamp (46% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.5% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.095% fail on Switch (9 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.51% fail on Horn
    • 0.16% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.16% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.13% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.095% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.063% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.063% fail on Lamp
      • 0.032% fail on Switch
      • 0.032% fail on Tell tale
  • 14% fail on Brakes (64% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 10% fail on Brake performance (190% worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 8.2% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 4.5% fail on Rear wheels (2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.60% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.32% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.28% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.19% fail on Brake performance not tested (3 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Brake operation
    • 4.2% fail on Hub components
      • 4.1% fail on Brake pads (26% worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.76% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.063% fail on Brake linings
    • 0.76% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.76% fail on Condition
    • 0.63% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.63% fail on Pedal
        • 0.63% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.57% fail on Hydraulic systems (54% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.47% fail on Components (56% better than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.44% fail on Hoses
        • 0.032% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.063% fail on Leaks
      • 0.032% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 0.44% fail on ABS
    • 0.32% fail on Mechanical components (180% worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Cable
      • 0.063% fail on Pivot (22 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Linkage
    • 0.19% fail on Restricted movement
  • 10% fail on Driver's view of the road (46% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 5.5% fail on Wipers (52% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Washers (34% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Windscreen
    • 1.2% fail on Mirrors (97% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.063% fail on Bonnet
  • 6.5% fail on Suspension (26% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Suspension arms (72% worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (74% worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Attachment
    • 1.7% fail on Shock absorbers (91% worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Condition (92% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.76% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.60% fail on Drive shafts (68% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.60% fail on Front drive shafts (68% better than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.57% fail on Constant velocity joints (69% better than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.032% fail on Couplings
    • 0.47% fail on Leaf springs
      • 0.25% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.22% fail on Shackle (2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.032% fail on Other pins and bushes
      • 0.22% fail on Condition
    • 0.41% fail on Coil springs (66% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Condition (65% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.28% fail on Axles (14 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Clearance (17 times worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.19% fail on Anti-roll bars (92% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.095% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.063% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (96% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Condition
    • 0.16% fail on General condition (7 times worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.13% fail on Wheel bearings (85% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.095% fail on Front (87% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Rear
    • 0.095% fail on Macpherson strut (73% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.095% fail on Condition (73% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.063% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.032% fail on Condition
      • 0.032% fail on Attachment
    • 0.032% fail on Fluid suspension
      • 0.032% fail on Suspension unit
    • 0.032% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.032% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.032% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
    • 0.032% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.032% fail on Spring mounting
  • 3.7% fail on Tyres (30% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Condition
    • 1.5% fail on Tread depth (49% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Size/type
    • 0.16% fail on Valve stem
  • 1.3% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.76% fail on Body condition (100% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.32% fail on Doors
      • 0.13% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.13% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.063% fail on Drivers
    • 0.13% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.063% fail on Seats
      • 0.032% fail on Passengers
      • 0.032% fail on Drivers
    • 0.032% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.032% fail on Chassis
    • 0.032% fail on Spare wheel
  • 1.2% fail on Steering
    • 0.85% fail on Steering system (40% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.60% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.095% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.25% fail on Power steering
      • 0.13% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.095% fail on Other components
      • 0.032% fail on Operation
    • 0.095% fail on Steering operation
  • 1.0% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 0.57% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.35% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.19% fail on System
      • 0.13% fail on Cap
      • 0.032% fail on Pipe
    • 0.13% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.032% fail on Emissions
  • 0.95% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.54% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.51% fail on Condition
      • 0.032% fail on Requirements
    • 0.41% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.38% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.032% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.79% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.79% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.28% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.19% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.095% fail on Attachment