Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

FIAT Doblo MOT Results

Registered in 2001
44.2% pass rate
from 405 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2001 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Doblo is unusually good or bad.

  • 30% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 11% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 8.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 6.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.7% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.5% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.25% fail on All position lamps
    • 5.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 4.4% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.25% fail on Side repeaters
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.0% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.25% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.25% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (65% better than other 2001 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Fog lamp (64% better than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.74% fail on Horn (75% better than other 2001 vans)
    • 0.49% fail on Battery
    • 0.25% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 23% fail on Suspension
    • 13% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 6.7% fail on Component mounting
      • 6.2% fail on Spring mounting
      • 0.49% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 6.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 5.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.2% fail on Condition (14 times worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Attachment
    • 3.5% fail on Drive shafts
      • 3.5% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 3.5% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 2.2% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.2% fail on Condition
    • 2.0% fail on Macpherson strut (6 times worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Condition (6 times worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Coil springs
      • 1.5% fail on Location (23 times worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Condition
    • 1.7% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.5% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.5% fail on Rear
    • 0.49% fail on Anti-roll bars (87% better than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.49% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.25% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.25% fail on Condition
  • 20% fail on Brakes
    • 13% fail on Brake performance
      • 7.9% fail on Front wheels
      • 6.7% fail on Rear wheels
      • 5.4% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.5% fail on Parking brake performance (58% better than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.49% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 4.7% fail on Hydraulic systems (56% better than other 2001 vans)
      • 4.0% fail on Components (61% better than other 2001 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Valves
        • 1.2% fail on Hoses
        • 0.99% fail on Pipes (84% better than other 2001 vans)
        • 0.25% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.49% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.25% fail on Operation
    • 3.0% fail on Hub components
      • 1.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.99% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.25% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.25% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 2.5% fail on Parking brake
      • 2.2% fail on Condition
      • 0.25% fail on Electronic parking brake
    • 0.49% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.49% fail on Pedal
        • 0.49% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.49% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.25% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.25% fail on Cable
    • 0.25% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.25% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
  • 14% fail on Tyres (83% worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 7.9% fail on Tread depth (74% worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 6.4% fail on Condition (97% worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 0.49% fail on Size/type
    • 0.25% fail on Valve stem
  • 14% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 7.4% fail on Wipers
    • 6.9% fail on Washers
    • 1.5% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.99% fail on Mirrors
  • 13% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (70% worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 8.4% fail on Exhaust system (71% worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Emissions (150% worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.5% fail on System
      • 0.74% fail on Pipe (3 times worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Cap
    • 1.7% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 7.7% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 3.0% fail on Body condition
    • 1.5% fail on Engine mountings (9 times worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.5% fail on Chassis
    • 1.5% fail on Doors
      • 0.99% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.74% fail on Drivers
    • 0.25% fail on Seats
      • 0.25% fail on Drivers
    • 0.25% fail on Spare wheel
  • 7.4% fail on Steering
    • 6.2% fail on Steering system
      • 5.2% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.74% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.49% fail on Steering rack
    • 1.2% fail on Power steering
      • 0.99% fail on Operation
      • 0.49% fail on Other components
  • 4.4% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 3.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.5% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.25% fail on Requirements
    • 0.74% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.25% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.25% fail on Drivers airbag
      • 0.25% fail on Passengers airbag
  • 2.0% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 2.0% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.99% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.49% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 0.49% fail on Attachment
  • 0.25% fail on Towbars
    • 0.25% fail on Vehicle structure
Read the Honest John Review

  • Fiat Doblo (2001 - 2009)
    Utilitarian looking. Bigger than Berlingo. Available with seven seats. Best with 1.3 Multijet diesel. Handles decently.