Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

FIAT Doblo MOT Results

Registered in 2002
47.4% pass rate
from 1,214 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Doblo is unusually good or bad.

  • 34% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 9.8% fail on Headlamp aim (51% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 9.4% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 8.6% fail on Headlamps (110% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 8.6% fail on Headlamp (120% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 7.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 6.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.2% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.6% fail on Rear lamps (53% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.082% fail on Switch
    • 5.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 5.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 4.4% fail on Individual lamps (68% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.99% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.25% fail on Side repeaters (79% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Battery
    • 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (68% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Fog lamp (67% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.58% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.49% fail on Horn (80% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.082% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.082% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 23% fail on Suspension
    • 6.4% fail on Prescribed areas (24% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.6% fail on Component mounting
      • 3.0% fail on Spring mounting
    • 6.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 5.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.41% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Attachment
    • 3.5% fail on Drive shafts
      • 3.5% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 3.5% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 3.3% fail on Coil springs
      • 2.6% fail on Condition
      • 0.66% fail on Location (10 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Shock absorbers (63% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on Condition (63% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 2.0% fail on Rear (190% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.49% fail on Front (75% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.2% fail on Anti-roll bars (76% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.74% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (75% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (82% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Attachment
    • 1.2% fail on Macpherson strut (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.33% fail on Leaf springs (71% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.082% fail on Condition
      • 0.082% fail on Spring eye
      • 0.082% fail on Pins and bushes
        • 0.082% fail on Shackle
      • 0.082% fail on Securing bolts
    • 0.16% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.16% fail on Condition
    • 0.082% fail on General condition
  • 18% fail on Brakes (19% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 13% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.2% fail on Front wheels (42% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 5.4% fail on Rear wheels
      • 4.4% fail on Service brake performance (43% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on Parking brake performance (53% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.25% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.16% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.7% fail on Hydraulic systems (55% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.8% fail on Components (62% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 2.0% fail on Valves
        • 1.3% fail on Pipes (79% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.41% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.082% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.082% fail on Hoses
      • 0.66% fail on Operation (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.25% fail on Leaks
    • 2.7% fail on Parking brake (81% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Condition (81% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Hub components
      • 1.2% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.99% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.082% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.082% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 0.66% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.66% fail on Pedal
        • 0.49% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.16% fail on Condition
    • 0.25% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.25% fail on Cable
    • 0.16% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.082% fail on ABS
  • 14% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (88% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 9.1% fail on Exhaust system (100% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Emissions (130% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.82% fail on System
      • 0.41% fail on Cap
      • 0.25% fail on Pipe
      • 0.082% fail on Tank
    • 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested (130% worse than other 2002 vans)
  • 13% fail on Tyres (58% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 8.0% fail on Tread depth (62% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.2% fail on Condition (55% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.82% fail on Size/type
  • 12% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.2% fail on Washers (35% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.6% fail on Wipers
    • 0.91% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.66% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.082% fail on Bonnet
  • 4.7% fail on Steering (38% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 3.2% fail on Steering system (50% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Track rod end (44% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on Steering rack (73% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.082% fail on Other components
        • 0.082% fail on Steering component
    • 1.4% fail on Power steering
      • 0.49% fail on Operation
      • 0.49% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.25% fail on Other components
      • 0.16% fail on Rams (7 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.082% fail on Steering operation
  • 4.0% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (48% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Body condition (73% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.91% fail on Engine mountings (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.91% fail on Doors
      • 0.41% fail on Drivers
      • 0.33% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.16% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.82% fail on Vehicle structure (64% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.82% fail on Chassis (64% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.33% fail on Seats
      • 0.16% fail on Passengers
      • 0.16% fail on Drivers
    • 0.33% fail on Load security
      • 0.16% fail on Tailgate (9 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.082% fail on Access panel
      • 0.082% fail on Loading door
    • 0.25% fail on Spare wheel
  • 3.1% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (42% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Seat belts (49% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas (63% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.82% fail on Condition
      • 0.16% fail on Requirements
      • 0.082% fail on Attachment
    • 0.99% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.99% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 1.2% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.91% fail on Road Wheels (140% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.82% fail on Attachment (180% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.082% fail on Condition
  • 0.33% fail on Towbars
    • 0.25% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.082% fail on Towbar
Read the Honest John Review

  • Fiat Doblo (2001 - 2009)
    Utilitarian looking. Bigger than Berlingo. Available with seven seats. Best with 1.3 Multijet diesel. Handles decently.