Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

FIAT Doblo MOT Results

Registered in 2004
48.9% pass rate
from 2,940 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Doblo is unusually good or bad.

  • 31% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 9.8% fail on Headlamp aim (55% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 9.7% fail on Registration plate lamp (15% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 7.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.3% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.5% fail on Rear lamps (48% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.034% fail on Switch
    • 7.2% fail on Headlamps (89% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 7.2% fail on Headlamp (92% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.068% fail on Switch
      • 0.034% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.034% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 5.5% fail on Direction indicators (36% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 5.5% fail on Flashing type (36% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 4.4% fail on Individual lamps (64% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.78% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.27% fail on Side repeaters (74% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.068% fail on Tell tales
    • 5.2% fail on Stop lamp (30% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (36% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Fog lamp (37% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Tell tale
    • 1.4% fail on Battery
    • 0.75% fail on Horn (64% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.24% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.17% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.17% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.10% fail on Hazard warning (88% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.068% fail on Lamp
      • 0.034% fail on Tell tale
  • 19% fail on Suspension (23% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.14% fail on Attachment
      • 0.034% fail on Condition
    • 4.0% fail on Shock absorbers (110% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 4.0% fail on Condition (110% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.5% fail on Rear (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Front (34% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Prescribed areas (59% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Spring mounting (56% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Component mounting (65% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.034% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 2.4% fail on Drive shafts (45% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Front drive shafts (44% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 2.4% fail on Constant velocity joints (43% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Anti-roll bars (66% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (74% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.82% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (54% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.51% fail on Attachment
      • 0.034% fail on Condition
    • 1.9% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.3% fail on Leaf springs
      • 0.71% fail on Pins and bushes (110% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.61% fail on Shackle (100% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.068% fail on Anchor
        • 0.034% fail on Other pins and bushes
      • 0.17% fail on Securing bolts
      • 0.14% fail on Shackle bracket
      • 0.10% fail on Condition (76% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Spring eye (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Anchor bracket
    • 0.48% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.48% fail on Condition
    • 0.37% fail on Coil springs (86% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Condition (92% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Location
    • 0.14% fail on Axles
      • 0.10% fail on Clearance (4 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.034% fail on Axle beam
    • 0.10% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.10% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.068% fail on General condition
    • 0.068% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.068% fail on Condition
    • 0.034% fail on Torsion bars
      • 0.034% fail on Attachment
    • 0.034% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.034% fail on Condition
    • 0.034% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.034% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.034% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 17% fail on Brakes (18% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 11% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.3% fail on Front wheels (65% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 4.6% fail on Rear wheels
      • 3.9% fail on Service brake performance (120% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Parking brake performance (60% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.99% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.068% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.034% fail on Brake operation
    • 3.6% fail on Hydraulic systems (58% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 3.1% fail on Components (61% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Pipes (77% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Valves
        • 0.41% fail on Hoses (58% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.17% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.034% fail on Cylinders
      • 0.34% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.17% fail on Leaks (65% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Operation
    • 2.6% fail on Hub components
      • 2.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.88% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.034% fail on Brake linings
    • 2.5% fail on Parking brake (94% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Condition (95% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.37% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.37% fail on Pedal
        • 0.20% fail on Condition
        • 0.17% fail on Anti-slip (71% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.34% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.31% fail on Cable
      • 0.068% fail on Lever
    • 0.27% fail on ABS (78% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.20% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.10% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.068% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
      • 0.034% fail on Components
        • 0.034% fail on Pipes
        • 0.034% fail on Valves
  • 13% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (100% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 7.6% fail on Exhaust system (93% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Emissions (190% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested (110% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.48% fail on Cap
      • 0.48% fail on System
      • 0.17% fail on Tank
      • 0.10% fail on Pipe
      • 0.034% fail on Hose
  • 11% fail on Tyres (36% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 6.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 5.8% fail on Condition (64% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.44% fail on Size/type
  • 11% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.6% fail on Wipers
    • 4.6% fail on Washers
    • 0.88% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.48% fail on Mirrors (57% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.068% fail on Bonnet
  • 4.5% fail on Steering (37% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Steering system (37% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 3.1% fail on Track rod end (24% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.20% fail on Steering rack (78% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.034% fail on Free play
        • 0.034% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.54% fail on Power steering
      • 0.24% fail on Operation
      • 0.17% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.068% fail on Other components
      • 0.034% fail on Drive system
      • 0.034% fail on Rams
    • 0.20% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.034% fail on Locking devices
  • 3.0% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (52% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Doors (68% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Passengers other (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Drivers
      • 0.068% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.58% fail on Body condition (83% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.48% fail on Engine mountings (150% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.37% fail on Vehicle structure (79% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.37% fail on Chassis (79% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.27% fail on Seats
      • 0.24% fail on Passengers
      • 0.034% fail on Drivers
    • 0.14% fail on Spare wheel
    • 0.068% fail on Load security
      • 0.034% fail on Tailgate
      • 0.034% fail on Loading door
    • 0.034% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.034% fail on Body security
  • 2.4% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (56% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Seat belts (59% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.78% fail on Prescribed areas (73% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Condition
      • 0.27% fail on Requirements
      • 0.034% fail on Attachment
      • 0.034% fail on Installation check
        • 0.034% fail on Belt(s)/padding
    • 0.92% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (46% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.88% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (43% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.034% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 1.0% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.58% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.34% fail on Attachment
    • 0.24% fail on Condition
  • 0.034% fail on Towbars
    • 0.034% fail on Vehicle structure
Read the Honest John Review

  • Fiat Doblo (2001 - 2009)
    Utilitarian looking. Bigger than Berlingo. Available with seven seats. Best with 1.3 Multijet diesel. Handles decently.