FIAT Doblo MOT Results
Registered in 200450.1% pass rate
from 1,526 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Doblo is unusually good or bad.
-
21% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
9.6% fail on
Headlamps
(110% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 9.5% fail on Headlamp (140% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
5.4% fail on
Direction indicators
(54% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
5.4% fail on
Flashing type
(54% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 4.8% fail on Individual direction indicators (100% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.46% fail on Side repeaters (60% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.33% fail on All direction indicators
-
5.4% fail on
Flashing type
(54% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
4.0% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.72% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 3.3% fail on Stop lamp (42% better than other 2004 vans)
- 3.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.8% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(42% better than other 2004 vans)
-
1.8% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(42% better than other 2004 vans)
- 1.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (42% better than other 2004 vans)
-
1.8% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(42% better than other 2004 vans)
-
0.52% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.46% fail on Position lamp
- 0.066% fail on All position lamps
-
0.39% fail on
Electrical equipment
(81% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.20% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.20% fail on Horn (84% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.066% fail on Rear reflectors
-
9.6% fail on
Headlamps
(110% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
20% fail on
Suspension
- 9.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (47% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
7.0% fail on
Suspension arms
- 5.1% fail on Ball joint
- 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.59% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.20% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.066% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
3.3% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(46% better than other 2004 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes
- 1.0% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.46% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.20% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.20% fail on Linkage
- 0.20% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (74% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.20% fail on Ball joint
- 0.20% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (81% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
2.2% fail on
Springs
(43% better than other 2004 vans)
-
0.98% fail on
Leaf springs
- 0.72% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Shackle bracket
- 0.066% fail on Leaf spring
- 0.066% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
- 0.85% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
0.33% fail on
Coil springs
(86% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.33% fail on Coil spring (86% better than other 2004 vans)
-
0.98% fail on
Leaf springs
- 1.5% fail on Wheel bearings
- 1.4% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.59% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.33% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.13% fail on Macpherson strut
- 0.13% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.39% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.20% fail on Ball joint
- 0.066% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.066% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.066% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.20% fail on
Sub-frames
(78% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (80% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.066% fail on Sub-frame
-
18% fail on
Brakes
-
13% fail on
Brake performance
-
6.6% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(96% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
6.6% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(98% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 3.9% fail on Service brake performance (100% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 3.4% fail on Service brake imbalance (81% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
6.6% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(98% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
6.5% fail on
Service brake performance
(50% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
6.4% fail on
Rbt
(52% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 5.4% fail on Service brake performance (54% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 1.5% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.066% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.066% fail on Service brake performance
-
6.4% fail on
Rbt
(52% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
3.0% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(52% better than other 2004 vans)
- 2.9% fail on Rbt (sp) (52% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.066% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
-
1.1% fail on
Parking brake performance
(55% better than other 2004 vans)
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt
(53% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.92% fail on Parking brake performance (57% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.20% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt
(53% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.20% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
6.6% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(96% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
3.5% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.1% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(81% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 2.0% fail on Brake discs (81% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.066% fail on Brake drums
-
1.5% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.5% fail on Brake pads
-
0.39% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.26% fail on Cable
- 0.13% fail on Lever
-
2.1% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(81% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 1.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes (66% better than other 2004 vans)
-
1.1% fail on
Parking brake control
(92% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Lever (93% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 1.0% fail on Load sensing valves
-
0.85% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.72% fail on Hand lever (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Pedal
-
0.20% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(88% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.20% fail on Anti-lock braking system (88% better than other 2004 vans)
-
0.13% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.13% fail on Reservoirs
-
0.066% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.066% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
13% fail on
Brake performance
-
15% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 7.8% fail on Exhaust system (140% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
2.8% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 2.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.13% fail on
Sub-frame
- 0.13% fail on Sub-frame condition
-
2.5% fail on
Transmission
(46% better than other 2004 vans)
-
2.3% fail on
Drive shafts
(41% better than other 2004 vans)
- 2.2% fail on Joints (42% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.066% fail on Drive shaft
-
0.20% fail on
Prop shafts
(75% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.20% fail on Joints
-
2.3% fail on
Drive shafts
(41% better than other 2004 vans)
-
1.5% fail on
Chassis
- 1.5% fail on Chassis condition
-
1.2% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.59% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.33% fail on Tank
- 0.13% fail on Hose
- 0.13% fail on Pipe
- 0.066% fail on System
-
1.2% fail on
Doors
-
0.92% fail on
Other passenger's door
(160% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.85% fail on Door condition (160% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.066% fail on Pillar
-
0.26% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.13% fail on Catch (9 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.066% fail on Door condition
- 0.066% fail on Hinge
-
0.066% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.066% fail on Door condition
-
0.92% fail on
Other passenger's door
(160% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
0.98% fail on
Engine mounting
(2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.92% fail on Engine mounting condition (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.066% fail on Bracket
-
0.39% fail on
Body
- 0.20% fail on Other body component
- 0.13% fail on Panel
- 0.066% fail on Body condition
-
0.26% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.26% fail on Carrier
-
0.26% fail on
Seats
- 0.20% fail on Passenger's seat
- 0.066% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.20% fail on Floor
- 0.13% fail on Bumpers
-
0.066% fail on
Towbar
- 0.066% fail on Vehicle structure
-
0.066% fail on
Load security
- 0.066% fail on Loading door
-
0.066% fail on
Cabs
- 0.066% fail on Prescribed areas
-
12% fail on
Visibility
- 6.7% fail on Wipers (30% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 5.4% fail on Washers
-
0.46% fail on
View to rear
- 0.46% fail on Mirrors
-
0.39% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.39% fail on Windscreen
- 0.066% fail on Bonnet
-
9.0% fail on
Tyres
(54% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 5.2% fail on Tread depth (56% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 4.1% fail on Condition (56% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.59% fail on Size/type
-
8.1% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(74% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
7.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(100% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
6.5% fail on
Compression ignition
(110% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 3.7% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (120% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 1.8% fail on Emissions not tested (110% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.72% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.52% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.066% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.066% fail on Other emission control equipment
- 0.066% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
-
1.5% fail on
Spark ignition
(90% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.98% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (100% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.33% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.33% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.066% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
6.5% fail on
Compression ignition
(110% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
0.33% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.20% fail on Engine oil leaks (74% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Other leaks
-
7.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(100% worse than other 2004 vans)
-
4.8% fail on
Steering
(32% better than other 2004 vans)
-
4.2% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 4.1% fail on Track rod end
- 0.066% fail on Ball joint
- 0.066% fail on Drag link end
- 0.066% fail on Locking devices
-
0.46% fail on
Power steering
- 0.26% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.20% fail on Operation
-
0.13% fail on
Steering gear
(90% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Steering rack (89% better than other 2004 vans)
-
4.2% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
2.8% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(41% better than other 2004 vans)
-
2.2% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.5% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.59% fail on Condition
- 0.13% fail on Attachment
- 0.066% fail on Requirements
- 0.66% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (61% better than other 2004 vans)
-
2.2% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.98% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.92% fail on Registration plates
- 0.066% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
-
0.72% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.59% fail on Attachment
- 0.13% fail on Condition
-
0.066% fail on
Seat belt installation check
- 0.066% fail on Anchorages
Read the Honest John Review
-
Fiat Doblo (2001 - 2009)
Utilitarian looking. Bigger than Berlingo. Available with seven seats. Best with 1.3 Multijet diesel. Handles decently.