FIAT Doblo MOT Results

Registered in 2006
57.5% pass rate
from 3,445 tests in 2017
(13% better than other 2006 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2006 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Doblo is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (18% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 9.2% fail on Registration plate lamp (17% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 7.8% fail on Headlamp aim (29% worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 5.4% fail on Stop lamp (25% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.0% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.12% fail on Switch (3 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.029% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.029% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 3.7% fail on Position lamps (57% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Rear lamps (34% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Front lamps (73% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.087% fail on Switch (3 times worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Direction indicators (26% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Flashing type (26% better than other 2006 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Individual lamps (32% better than other 2006 vans)
        • 0.58% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.35% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.99% fail on Rear fog lamp (64% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.99% fail on Fog lamp (64% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.029% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.029% fail on Switch
    • 0.73% fail on Battery
    • 0.67% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.20% fail on Horn (85% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.20% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.12% fail on Hazard warning (81% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Lamp
      • 0.029% fail on Switch
      • 0.029% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.087% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.029% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 11% fail on Suspension (48% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Suspension arms (25% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 3.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (26% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Attachment
    • 3.0% fail on Shock absorbers (68% worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on Condition (68% worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Drive shafts (55% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Front drive shafts (54% better than other 2006 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Constant velocity joints (56% better than other 2006 vans)
        • 0.058% fail on Couplings
      • 0.029% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.029% fail on Drive shafts
    • 1.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (77% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.70% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (56% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.49% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (88% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Attachment
      • 0.029% fail on Condition
    • 1.1% fail on Front suspension joints (51% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.87% fail on Wheel bearings (59% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.75% fail on Front (55% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Rear (77% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.73% fail on Leaf springs
      • 0.46% fail on Pins and bushes
        • 0.41% fail on Shackle
        • 0.058% fail on Anchor
        • 0.029% fail on Other pins and bushes
      • 0.20% fail on Shackle bracket (4 times worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.058% fail on Securing bolts
    • 0.52% fail on Macpherson strut (180% worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Condition (180% worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.23% fail on Prescribed areas (94% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Spring mounting (93% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.087% fail on Component mounting (95% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on Coil springs (95% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.058% fail on Condition (98% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.058% fail on Location
    • 0.029% fail on General condition
    • 0.029% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.029% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.029% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.029% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.029% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 11% fail on Brakes (42% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 5.6% fail on Brake performance (43% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Front wheels
      • 2.3% fail on Rear wheels (50% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance (79% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.70% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.058% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.058% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.3% fail on Hub components
      • 1.8% fail on Brake pads (31% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Brake discs (56% worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.029% fail on Brake linings
    • 1.5% fail on Hydraulic systems (77% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Components (81% better than other 2006 vans)
        • 0.38% fail on Valves (50% better than other 2006 vans)
        • 0.32% fail on Reservoirs (120% worse than other 2006 vans)
        • 0.29% fail on Hoses (58% better than other 2006 vans)
        • 0.17% fail on Pipes (96% better than other 2006 vans)
        • 0.029% fail on Cylinders
      • 0.26% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.087% fail on Operation
      • 0.058% fail on Leaks (82% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.52% fail on ABS (60% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.20% fail on Service brake control components (68% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Pedal (68% better than other 2006 vans)
        • 0.17% fail on Anti-slip (68% better than other 2006 vans)
        • 0.029% fail on Condition
    • 0.12% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.058% fail on Mechanical components (86% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.029% fail on Lever
      • 0.029% fail on Cable
    • 0.029% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.029% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
    • 0.029% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.029% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.029% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
  • 11% fail on Tyres (31% worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 6.3% fail on Tread depth (33% worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Condition (32% worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.44% fail on Size/type
    • 0.12% fail on Valve stem
  • 9.7% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.8% fail on Wipers
    • 3.0% fail on Washers (26% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.46% fail on Windscreen (57% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.26% fail on Mirrors (75% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.029% fail on Bonnet
  • 9.3% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (88% worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 5.5% fail on Exhaust system (85% worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Emissions (180% worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.84% fail on System (140% worse than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Cap
      • 0.087% fail on Tank
      • 0.058% fail on Pipe
      • 0.029% fail on Hose
    • 0.84% fail on Emissions not tested (110% worse than other 2006 vans)
  • 2.8% fail on Steering (52% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Steering system (51% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Track rod end (44% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Steering rack (65% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint (70% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.029% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.35% fail on Power steering (51% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Operation
      • 0.087% fail on Other components
      • 0.029% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.029% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.029% fail on Locking devices
  • 2.2% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (46% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.75% fail on Engine mountings (4 times worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.61% fail on Doors
      • 0.49% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.12% fail on Drivers
      • 0.058% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.35% fail on Spare wheel (2 times worse than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.26% fail on Body condition (88% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on Seats
      • 0.087% fail on Drivers
      • 0.029% fail on Passengers
    • 0.12% fail on Load security
      • 0.058% fail on Loading door
      • 0.029% fail on Bootlid
      • 0.029% fail on Tailgate
    • 0.029% fail on Body security
  • 2.0% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (50% better than other 2006 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.99% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.087% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.90% fail on Seat belts (65% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.58% fail on Condition
      • 0.15% fail on Attachment
      • 0.12% fail on Requirements
      • 0.058% fail on Prescribed areas (97% better than other 2006 vans)
      • 0.029% fail on Installation check
        • 0.029% fail on Anchorage's
  • 0.73% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.73% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.41% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.35% fail on Attachment
    • 0.058% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

  • Fiat Doblo (2001 - 2009)
    Utilitarian looking. Bigger than Berlingo. Available with seven seats. Best with 1.3 Multijet diesel. Handles decently.