FIAT Doblo MOT Results
Registered in 200859.2% pass rate
from 2,896 tests in 2021
(15% better than other 2008 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Doblo is unusually good or bad.
-
14% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(30% better than other 2008 vans)
-
4.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.7% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.38% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 4.1% fail on Stop lamp (35% better than other 2008 vans)
- 3.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (34% better than other 2008 vans)
-
3.1% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.1% fail on Headlamp
- 0.10% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
1.2% fail on
Direction indicators
(57% better than other 2008 vans)
-
1.2% fail on
Flashing type
(57% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.93% fail on Individual direction indicators (52% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.28% fail on Side repeaters (70% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.035% fail on All direction indicators
-
1.2% fail on
Flashing type
(57% better than other 2008 vans)
-
0.79% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(71% better than other 2008 vans)
-
0.79% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(71% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.79% fail on Rear fog lamp (71% better than other 2008 vans)
-
0.79% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(71% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.48% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.35% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.31% fail on Position lamp
- 0.035% fail on Switch
-
0.35% fail on
Electrical equipment
(72% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.21% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.069% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.069% fail on Horn (91% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.035% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
4.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
10% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(54% worse than other 2008 vans)
-
10% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(66% worse than other 2008 vans)
-
6.9% fail on
Compression ignition
(47% worse than other 2008 vans)
- 3.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (40% worse than other 2008 vans)
- 1.5% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (72% worse than other 2008 vans)
- 1.4% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 0.97% fail on Emissions not tested (66% worse than other 2008 vans)
- 0.21% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
-
0.14% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.10% fail on Particulate filter (8 times worse than other 2008 vans)
- 0.035% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve
- 0.035% fail on Other emission control equipment
- 0.069% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
-
3.4% fail on
Spark ignition
(130% worse than other 2008 vans)
- 1.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 1.2% fail on Catalyst emissions (7 times worse than other 2008 vans)
- 0.69% fail on Emissions not tested (7 times worse than other 2008 vans)
- 0.10% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
6.9% fail on
Compression ignition
(47% worse than other 2008 vans)
-
0.28% fail on
Fluid leaks
(60% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.24% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.035% fail on Other leaks
-
10% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(66% worse than other 2008 vans)
-
9.4% fail on
Visibility
- 6.1% fail on Wipers (38% worse than other 2008 vans)
- 3.5% fail on Washers (23% better than other 2008 vans)
-
0.48% fail on
View to rear
- 0.48% fail on Mirrors
-
0.28% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.28% fail on Windscreen
-
9.1% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 5.4% fail on Exhaust system (130% worse than other 2008 vans)
-
1.6% fail on
Transmission
(61% better than other 2008 vans)
-
1.5% fail on
Drive shafts
(56% better than other 2008 vans)
- 1.5% fail on Joints (56% better than other 2008 vans)
-
0.10% fail on
Prop shafts
(85% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.10% fail on Joints
-
1.5% fail on
Drive shafts
(56% better than other 2008 vans)
-
0.93% fail on
Doors
-
0.76% fail on
Other passenger's door
(2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
- 0.73% fail on Door condition (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
- 0.035% fail on Catch
-
0.10% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.069% fail on Door condition
- 0.035% fail on Catch
-
0.069% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.069% fail on Door condition
-
0.76% fail on
Other passenger's door
(2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
-
0.66% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.35% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.21% fail on Tank
- 0.14% fail on Pipe
-
0.59% fail on
Engine mounting
(2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
- 0.52% fail on Engine mounting condition (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
- 0.069% fail on Bracket
-
0.21% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(87% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.21% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (86% better than other 2008 vans)
-
0.21% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.10% fail on Spare wheel condition
- 0.10% fail on Carrier
-
0.21% fail on
Seats
- 0.17% fail on Passenger's seat
- 0.035% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.14% fail on
Body
(77% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.10% fail on Other body component
- 0.035% fail on Panel
-
0.14% fail on
Load security
- 0.10% fail on Loading door
-
0.035% fail on
Tailgate
- 0.035% fail on Tailgate condition
-
0.10% fail on
Chassis
(90% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.10% fail on Chassis condition (90% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.10% fail on Bumpers
-
0.069% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.035% fail on Boot lid condition
- 0.035% fail on Other boot lid component
-
0.035% fail on
Towbar
- 0.035% fail on Other towbar components
- 0.035% fail on Undertray
-
8.5% fail on
Suspension
(55% better than other 2008 vans)
-
4.0% fail on
Suspension arms
(37% better than other 2008 vans)
- 2.0% fail on Ball joint (41% better than other 2008 vans)
- 1.6% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.38% fail on Ball joint dust cover (71% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.069% fail on Suspension arm
-
1.5% fail on
Macpherson strut
(3 times worse than other 2008 vans)
- 0.93% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (5 times worse than other 2008 vans)
- 0.38% fail on Macpherson strut (7 times worse than other 2008 vans)
- 0.17% fail on Pins and bushes
-
1.2% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(83% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.35% fail on Pins and bushes (72% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.28% fail on Linkage ball joints (89% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.17% fail on Ball joint (75% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.14% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (79% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.14% fail on Ball joint dust cover (81% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.14% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (92% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.035% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.035% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.035% fail on Linkage
-
1.0% fail on
Springs
(76% better than other 2008 vans)
-
0.55% fail on
Coil springs
(76% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.38% fail on Coil spring (84% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.21% fail on Mounting (6 times worse than other 2008 vans)
- 0.28% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
0.24% fail on
Leaf springs
(87% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.14% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
- 0.035% fail on Leaf spring
- 0.035% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
- 0.035% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
-
0.55% fail on
Coil springs
(76% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.90% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (68% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.38% fail on Wheel bearings (78% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.35% fail on Shock absorbers (56% better than other 2008 vans)
-
0.28% fail on
Other suspension component
(62% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.21% fail on Ball joint
- 0.035% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.035% fail on Pins and bushes
-
4.0% fail on
Suspension arms
(37% better than other 2008 vans)
-
7.6% fail on
Tyres
(23% worse than other 2008 vans)
- 4.2% fail on Tread depth
- 3.7% fail on Condition (39% worse than other 2008 vans)
- 0.38% fail on Size/type
-
7.3% fail on
Brakes
(58% better than other 2008 vans)
-
4.2% fail on
Brake performance
(58% better than other 2008 vans)
-
2.5% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.5% fail on
Rbt
- 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.66% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.069% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.069% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
2.5% fail on
Rbt
-
1.2% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
1.2% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.73% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.66% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
1.2% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
1.1% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(84% better than other 2008 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (83% better than other 2008 vans)
-
0.38% fail on
Parking brake performance
(86% better than other 2008 vans)
-
0.38% fail on
Rbt
(86% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.35% fail on Parking brake performance (86% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.035% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.38% fail on
Rbt
(86% better than other 2008 vans)
-
2.5% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.7% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(36% better than other 2008 vans)
-
1.7% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.7% fail on Brake discs
-
1.1% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(59% better than other 2008 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Brake pads (59% better than other 2008 vans)
-
0.28% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.24% fail on Cable
- 0.035% fail on Lever
-
1.7% fail on
Brake discs and drums
-
0.52% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.35% fail on Hand lever
- 0.17% fail on Pedal
-
0.48% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(69% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.48% fail on Anti-lock braking system (65% better than other 2008 vans)
-
0.28% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.28% fail on Lever
- 0.21% fail on Load sensing valves
- 0.17% fail on Rigid brake pipes (96% better than other 2008 vans)
-
0.069% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.035% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.035% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
0.035% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.035% fail on Brake fluid
-
4.2% fail on
Brake performance
(58% better than other 2008 vans)
-
2.5% fail on
Steering
(59% better than other 2008 vans)
-
2.1% fail on
Steering linkage components
(52% better than other 2008 vans)
- 2.0% fail on Track rod end (52% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.10% fail on Ball joint
- 0.035% fail on Drag link end
-
0.035% fail on
Other components
- 0.035% fail on Steering component
-
0.14% fail on
Steering gear
(84% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.14% fail on Steering rack (83% better than other 2008 vans)
-
0.14% fail on
Power steering
(76% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.14% fail on Operation
-
0.035% fail on
Steering play
- 0.035% fail on Steering rack
-
2.1% fail on
Steering linkage components
(52% better than other 2008 vans)
-
1.2% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(64% better than other 2008 vans)
-
1.0% fail on
Seat belts
(54% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.62% fail on Condition
- 0.28% fail on Prescribed areas (79% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.10% fail on Requirements
- 0.24% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (81% better than other 2008 vans)
-
1.0% fail on
Seat belts
(54% better than other 2008 vans)
-
0.62% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.62% fail on Registration plates
-
0.38% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.24% fail on Attachment
- 0.14% fail on Condition
-
0.035% fail on
Speedometer and speed limiter
- 0.035% fail on Speedometer
-
0.035% fail on
Buses and coaches supplementary tests
-
0.035% fail on
Doors
- 0.035% fail on Passenger entrance/exit doors
-
0.035% fail on
Doors
Read the Honest John Review
-
Fiat Doblo (2001 - 2009)
Utilitarian looking. Bigger than Berlingo. Available with seven seats. Best with 1.3 Multijet diesel. Handles decently.