Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

FIAT Doblo MOT Results

Registered in 2008
58.0% pass rate
from 3,531 tests in 2020
(13% better than other 2008 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Doblo is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (30% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.25% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.1% fail on Stop lamp (40% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (31% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.5% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.057% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.9% fail on Position lamps (54% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Position lamp (53% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.028% fail on All position lamps
    • 1.6% fail on Direction indicators (44% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Flashing type (44% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Individual direction indicators (34% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.23% fail on Side repeaters (73% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.085% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.028% fail on Switch
    • 0.79% fail on Rear reflectors (77% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.51% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (80% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.51% fail on Rear fog lamp (80% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.48% fail on Rear fog lamp (81% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.028% fail on Switch
    • 0.45% fail on Electrical equipment (71% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.17% fail on Horn (84% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.028% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.028% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.028% fail on Switch
    • 0.028% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.028% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 11% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (53% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 11% fail on Exhaust emissions (61% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 7.6% fail on Compression ignition (50% worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 3.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (33% worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 2.1% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (93% worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 1.8% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (58% worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.74% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.20% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.085% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.057% fail on Other emission control equipment
          • 0.028% fail on Particulate filter
        • 0.057% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 3.2% fail on Spark ignition (96% worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 2.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (43% worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.88% fail on Catalyst emissions (6 times worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.17% fail on Emissions not tested (200% worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.085% fail on Non catalyst emissions
    • 0.59% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.48% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.11% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.028% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.028% fail on Undertray
  • 8.8% fail on Brakes (48% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 4.7% fail on Brake performance (50% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.7% fail on Rbt
          • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.65% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.028% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.028% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.5% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.96% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.68% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.99% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (85% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.99% fail on Rbt (sp) (85% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.42% fail on Parking brake performance (84% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.40% fail on Rbt (85% better than other 2008 vans)
          • 0.34% fail on Parking brake performance (86% better than other 2008 vans)
          • 0.057% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.028% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.028% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.028% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.028% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.4% fail on Mechanical brake components (30% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 2.0% fail on Brake discs
      • 1.7% fail on Brake linings and pads (49% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Brake pads (49% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (72% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.17% fail on Cable
    • 0.62% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.62% fail on Lever
    • 0.45% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (64% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.45% fail on Anti-lock braking system (57% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.25% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (63% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.11% fail on Pedal (77% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.25% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.17% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.14% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.028% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.057% fail on Rigid brake pipes (99% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.057% fail on Flexible brake hoses (83% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.057% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.028% fail on Other components
      • 0.028% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.028% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
    • 0.028% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.028% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 8.6% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.0% fail on Exhaust system (120% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Transmission (59% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Drive shafts (56% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Joints (55% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Prop shafts (79% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.11% fail on Joints
    • 0.99% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.48% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (100% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Tank
      • 0.17% fail on System
      • 0.11% fail on Pipe
    • 0.65% fail on Spare wheel (4 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.65% fail on Carrier (6 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.057% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.37% fail on Doors
      • 0.31% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.23% fail on Door condition
        • 0.085% fail on Catch
      • 0.028% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.028% fail on Hinge
      • 0.028% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.028% fail on Door condition
    • 0.31% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.23% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.085% fail on Bracket
    • 0.31% fail on Body
      • 0.23% fail on Other body component
      • 0.057% fail on Panel
      • 0.028% fail on Body condition
    • 0.23% fail on Seats
      • 0.23% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.14% fail on Undertray (3 times worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.057% fail on Integral vehicle structure (92% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.028% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.028% fail on Sub-frame condition
      • 0.028% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.057% fail on Towbar
      • 0.057% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.057% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.057% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.028% fail on Chassis
      • 0.028% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.028% fail on Load security
      • 0.028% fail on Loading door
    • 0.028% fail on Passenger compartment
  • 8.5% fail on Suspension (53% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Suspension arms (19% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.9% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.34% fail on Ball joint dust cover (67% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.085% fail on Suspension arm
    • 1.3% fail on Macpherson strut (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.68% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (3 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.37% fail on Macpherson strut (5 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.85% fail on Anti-roll bars (88% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.37% fail on Linkage ball joints (85% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Pins and bushes (78% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.085% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.085% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (87% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.057% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.028% fail on Linkage
      • 0.028% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.028% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.82% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.57% fail on Springs (86% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.42% fail on Leaf springs (77% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.23% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
        • 0.085% fail on Leaf spring (94% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.028% fail on Anchor bracket
        • 0.028% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
        • 0.028% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
        • 0.028% fail on Shackle bracket
      • 0.14% fail on Coil springs (93% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.085% fail on Coil spring (96% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.057% fail on Mounting
      • 0.028% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.40% fail on Wheel bearings (77% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.37% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (78% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.25% fail on Other suspension component (63% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (5 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint (73% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.028% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.028% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.028% fail on Suspension rod
  • 8.0% fail on Tyres (27% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.8% fail on Condition (48% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.25% fail on Size/type
  • 7.8% fail on Visibility (16% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 5.2% fail on Wipers
    • 2.5% fail on Washers (40% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.28% fail on View to rear (69% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Mirrors (69% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.25% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.25% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.11% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.085% fail on Driver's view
  • 2.7% fail on Steering (52% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Steering linkage components (47% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Track rod end (47% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.085% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.028% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.028% fail on Other components
        • 0.028% fail on Steering component
      • 0.028% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.34% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.23% fail on Steering rack (64% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Operation
    • 0.085% fail on Power steering (85% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.028% fail on Operation
      • 0.028% fail on Rams
      • 0.028% fail on Other components
    • 0.028% fail on Steering play
      • 0.028% fail on Steering rack
  • 1.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (67% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.68% fail on Seat belts (63% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.51% fail on Condition
      • 0.14% fail on Attachment
      • 0.028% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.028% fail on Requirements
    • 0.31% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (76% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.028% fail on Airbags
      • 0.028% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.42% fail on Identification of the vehicle (48% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.42% fail on Registration plates (48% better than other 2008 vans)
  • 0.20% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.14% fail on Attachment
    • 0.057% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

  • Fiat Doblo (2001 - 2009)
    Utilitarian looking. Bigger than Berlingo. Available with seven seats. Best with 1.3 Multijet diesel. Handles decently.