Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

FIAT Doblo MOT Results

Registered in 2012
62.5% pass rate
from 2,971 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Doblo is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Suspension (52% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 8.8% fail on Springs (2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 8.8% fail on Coil springs (3 times worse than other 2012 vans)
        • 8.8% fail on Coil spring (3 times worse than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.067% fail on Mounting
    • 4.2% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.6% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.67% fail on Ball joint dust cover (190% worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.50% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.13% fail on Linkage
      • 0.034% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.034% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.8% fail on Pins and bushes (77% worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Ball joint (73% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.067% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.067% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (6 times worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.98% fail on Macpherson strut (2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.47% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.20% fail on Macpherson strut (6 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.034% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.13% fail on Wheel bearings (87% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.10% fail on Axles
      • 0.067% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
      • 0.034% fail on Swivel joints/housing
    • 0.10% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.034% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.034% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.034% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.067% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.067% fail on Ball joint dust cover (9 times worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.034% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.034% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (29% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Stop lamp (34% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.6% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.067% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.24% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.6% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.3% fail on Side repeaters (70% worse than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.10% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.8% fail on Position lamps (53% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Position lamp (54% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.067% fail on All position lamps
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (75% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.81% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.44% fail on Horn
      • 0.27% fail on Battery(ies) (2 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.067% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.034% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.47% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.47% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.10% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (93% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Rear fog lamp (93% better than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.10% fail on Rear fog lamp (93% better than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.034% fail on Switch
    • 0.10% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.034% fail on Daytime running lamps
    • 0.034% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.034% fail on Switch
    • 0.034% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.034% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 7.6% fail on Tyres (42% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.8% fail on Condition (74% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.17% fail on Size/type
  • 6.3% fail on Brakes (43% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Brake performance (52% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt
          • 0.64% fail on Service brake performance (44% better than other 2012 vans)
          • 0.47% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (69% better than other 2012 vans)
        • 1.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (68% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Parking brake performance (72% better than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.34% fail on Rbt (71% better than other 2012 vans)
          • 0.27% fail on Parking brake performance (74% better than other 2012 vans)
          • 0.067% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.17% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (71% better than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.17% fail on Rbt (sp) (70% better than other 2012 vans)
          • 0.13% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.034% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.067% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.1% fail on Mechanical brake components (52% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Brake linings and pads (56% better than other 2012 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Brake pads (56% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.67% fail on Brake discs and drums (46% better than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.67% fail on Brake discs (45% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.20% fail on Cable
        • 0.034% fail on Lever
    • 1.4% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (140% worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.88% fail on Pedal (82% worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Hand lever (4 times worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Parking brake control (120% worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Lever (130% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.17% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.13% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.034% fail on Master cylinder
    • 0.13% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.13% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (81% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Anti-lock braking system (75% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.067% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.034% fail on Other components
      • 0.034% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.034% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
    • 0.034% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 5.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (48% worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 5.6% fail on Exhaust emissions (57% worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 4.6% fail on Compression ignition (69% worse than other 2012 vans)
        • 2.8% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (190% worse than other 2012 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.20% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.10% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (7 times worse than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.067% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
      • 1.1% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.71% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.30% fail on Catalyst emissions (10 times worse than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.10% fail on Emissions not tested (5 times worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.10% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.034% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.034% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.034% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 4.0% fail on Visibility (41% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Washers (38% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Wipers (40% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.30% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.30% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.30% fail on View to rear
      • 0.30% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.034% fail on Driver's view
  • 2.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure (46% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.94% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.71% fail on Transmission (78% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.61% fail on Drive shafts (79% better than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.57% fail on Joints (80% better than other 2012 vans)
        • 0.034% fail on Bearing housing
      • 0.10% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.10% fail on Joints
    • 0.34% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.13% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.10% fail on System
      • 0.067% fail on Pipe
      • 0.034% fail on Tank
    • 0.34% fail on Body
      • 0.30% fail on Other body component
      • 0.034% fail on Body condition
      • 0.034% fail on Panel
    • 0.20% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.13% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.067% fail on Bracket
    • 0.13% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.10% fail on Spare wheel condition
      • 0.034% fail on Carrier
    • 0.13% fail on Towbar (4 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Other towbar components (6 times worse than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.034% fail on Doors
      • 0.034% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.034% fail on Door condition
    • 0.034% fail on Seats
      • 0.034% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.034% fail on Undertray
  • 0.81% fail on Steering (73% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.27% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.17% fail on Operation (6 times worse than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.27% fail on Steering linkage components (89% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Track rod end (89% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.27% fail on Power steering
      • 0.20% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.067% fail on Other components
  • 0.67% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.67% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.37% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (73% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.20% fail on Seat belts (70% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Condition (70% better than other 2012 vans)
      • 0.034% fail on Requirements
    • 0.13% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (80% better than other 2012 vans)
    • 0.034% fail on Airbags
      • 0.034% fail on Passengers airbag
  • 0.10% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.067% fail on Condition
    • 0.067% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

  • Fiat Doblo (2010 on)
    Huge space. Massively practical. Great diesel engines. Decent ride quality and hardwearing interior.