FIAT Doblo MOT Results
Registered in 201672.8% pass rate
from 3,700 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Doblo is unusually good or bad.
-
9.2% fail on
Suspension
(100% worse than other 2016 vans)
-
5.9% fail on
Springs
(2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
-
5.9% fail on
Coil springs
(3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 5.9% fail on Coil spring (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.054% fail on Mounting (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
-
5.9% fail on
Coil springs
(3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
-
1.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.54% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.46% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.16% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.11% fail on Linkage
- 0.081% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.054% fail on Ball joint
- 0.027% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.027% fail on Pins and bushes
-
1.2% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.84% fail on Pins and bushes (68% worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.24% fail on Ball joint (62% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.16% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.027% fail on Suspension arm
-
0.68% fail on
Macpherson strut
(9 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.43% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (13 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.22% fail on Pins and bushes (8 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.027% fail on Macpherson strut
- 0.14% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.14% fail on Shock absorbers (69% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.11% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.081% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (11 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.027% fail on Ball joint
-
0.054% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.027% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.027% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
5.9% fail on
Springs
(2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
-
6.6% fail on
Tyres
(42% worse than other 2016 vans)
- 4.1% fail on Condition (73% worse than other 2016 vans)
- 2.8% fail on Tread depth
- 0.054% fail on Size/type
-
6.5% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(30% better than other 2016 vans)
-
2.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.14% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
1.7% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.7% fail on Headlamp
- 0.027% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
1.3% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.3% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.0% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.24% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.027% fail on Switch
-
1.3% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.86% fail on Stop lamp (59% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.41% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (78% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.24% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.19% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.19% fail on Position lamp
-
0.19% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.11% fail on Battery(ies) (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.054% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.027% fail on Horn
-
0.11% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(85% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.11% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(85% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.11% fail on Rear fog lamp (85% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.11% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(85% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.027% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.027% fail on Reversing lamps
-
2.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
5.0% fail on
Brakes
(23% better than other 2016 vans)
-
1.6% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Pedal (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.51% fail on Hand lever (8 times worse than other 2016 vans)
-
1.5% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(53% better than other 2016 vans)
-
1.0% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(60% better than other 2016 vans)
- 1.0% fail on Brake pads (59% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.54% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.54% fail on Brake discs
-
0.054% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.054% fail on Lever
-
1.0% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(60% better than other 2016 vans)
-
1.3% fail on
Brake performance
(51% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.76% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.76% fail on
Rbt
- 0.43% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.43% fail on Service brake imbalance (95% worse than other 2016 vans)
-
0.027% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.027% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.76% fail on
Rbt
-
0.41% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(75% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.41% fail on Rbt (sp) (75% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.11% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.11% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.081% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.027% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.11% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.081% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.081% fail on
Parking brake performance
(84% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.081% fail on
Rbt
(83% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.054% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.027% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.081% fail on
Rbt
(83% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.76% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.1% fail on
Parking brake control
(2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Lever (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
-
0.27% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.19% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.081% fail on Anti-lock braking system (81% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.11% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.081% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.081% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.027% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.6% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
-
3.5% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(63% worse than other 2016 vans)
-
3.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(69% worse than other 2016 vans)
-
2.7% fail on
Compression ignition
(70% worse than other 2016 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.97% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.27% fail on Emissions not tested (180% worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.19% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (6 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.054% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.027% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
0.81% fail on
Spark ignition
(70% worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.78% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (74% worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.027% fail on Catalyst emissions
-
2.7% fail on
Compression ignition
(70% worse than other 2016 vans)
-
0.081% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.081% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
3.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(69% worse than other 2016 vans)
-
3.5% fail on
Visibility
(35% better than other 2016 vans)
- 1.9% fail on Washers
- 1.3% fail on Wipers (49% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.19% fail on
View to rear
- 0.19% fail on Mirrors
-
0.11% fail on
Condition of glass
(74% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.11% fail on Windscreen (74% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.054% fail on Bonnet
- 0.027% fail on Driver's view
-
1.8% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
0.51% fail on
Fuel system
(4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.46% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (7 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.027% fail on Tank
- 0.027% fail on System
- 0.38% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.35% fail on
Transmission
(65% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.35% fail on
Drive shafts
(62% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.35% fail on Joints (61% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.35% fail on
Drive shafts
(62% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.24% fail on
Doors
-
0.11% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.11% fail on Door condition
-
0.081% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.081% fail on Door condition
-
0.054% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.054% fail on Door condition
-
0.11% fail on
Front passenger's door
-
0.11% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.11% fail on Engine mounting condition
-
0.081% fail on
Body
(75% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.081% fail on Other body component
- 0.081% fail on Undertray
- 0.027% fail on Bumpers
-
0.51% fail on
Fuel system
(4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
-
0.32% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.24% fail on Attachment
- 0.081% fail on Condition
-
0.22% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(76% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.16% fail on
Seat belts
(73% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.16% fail on Condition (70% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.054% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (83% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.16% fail on
Seat belts
(73% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.16% fail on
Steering
(84% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.081% fail on
Power steering
- 0.054% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.027% fail on Operation
- 0.027% fail on Other components
-
0.027% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.027% fail on Steering rack
-
0.027% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.027% fail on Track rod end
-
0.027% fail on
Steering play
- 0.027% fail on Steering rack
-
0.081% fail on
Power steering
-
0.027% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.027% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review
-
Fiat Doblo (2010 - 2021)
Massively practical. Decent economy from diesel engines. Hard-wearing interior.