FIAT Doblo MOT Results

Registered in 2016
77.7% pass rate
from 3,832 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Doblo is unusually good or bad.

  • 5.9% fail on Brakes
    • 2.3% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Pedal (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.57% fail on Hand lever (10 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Mechanical brake components (36% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Brake linings and pads (41% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Brake pads (42% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.026% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.39% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.39% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.078% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.078% fail on Lever
    • 1.2% fail on Parking brake control (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Lever (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.73% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.73% fail on Rbt
          • 0.47% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.26% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.31% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (62% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.31% fail on Rbt (sp) (62% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.21% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.10% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.10% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.10% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.078% fail on Rbt
          • 0.052% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.026% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.026% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.026% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.026% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.13% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.10% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.026% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.026% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.078% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.052% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.026% fail on Servos
    • 0.026% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 5.6% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (41% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim (24% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.026% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.078% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.81% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.81% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.70% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.10% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.63% fail on Stop lamp (64% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.60% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (61% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Position lamps (86% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Position lamp (88% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.026% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.10% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (82% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Rear fog lamp (82% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.10% fail on Rear fog lamp (82% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.10% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.078% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.026% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.026% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.026% fail on Horn
    • 0.052% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.052% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 5.2% fail on Tyres (31% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Condition (64% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.052% fail on Size/type
  • 3.4% fail on Visibility
    • 1.7% fail on Washers
    • 1.3% fail on Wipers
    • 0.23% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.23% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.21% fail on View to rear
      • 0.21% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.078% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.026% fail on Driver's view
  • 3.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (190% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.2% fail on Exhaust emissions (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 2.9% fail on Compression ignition (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (200% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.10% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (11 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.026% fail on Pre 01/01/1980 visual
        • 0.026% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.026% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.39% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.37% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.026% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.026% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.026% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 3.0% fail on Suspension (42% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.86% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.81% fail on Springs (78% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.81% fail on Coil springs (120% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.81% fail on Coil spring (120% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.55% fail on Macpherson strut (12 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (22 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.078% fail on Macpherson strut (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.078% fail on Pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.52% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.29% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.078% fail on Linkage
      • 0.052% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.052% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.026% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.026% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.16% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.10% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (18 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.052% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.10% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.10% fail on Suspension arms (76% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.078% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.026% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.026% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 2.0% fail on Body, chassis, structure (45% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Fuel system (8 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (21 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.23% fail on Body
      • 0.16% fail on Other body component
      • 0.078% fail on Panel
    • 0.21% fail on Doors
      • 0.13% fail on Front passenger's door (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.10% fail on Door condition (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.026% fail on Catch
      • 0.052% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.052% fail on Door condition
      • 0.026% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.026% fail on Door condition
    • 0.18% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.16% fail on Transmission
      • 0.13% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.10% fail on Joints (69% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.026% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.026% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.026% fail on Joints
    • 0.052% fail on Undertray
    • 0.026% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.026% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.026% fail on Carrier
    • 0.026% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.026% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.026% fail on Load security
      • 0.026% fail on Loading door
    • 0.026% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.026% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 0.34% fail on Steering
    • 0.23% fail on Steering gear (8 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Operation (31 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.10% fail on Power steering
      • 0.052% fail on Operation
      • 0.026% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.026% fail on Rams
      • 0.026% fail on Other components
  • 0.29% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (61% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.23% fail on Seat belts (58% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Condition (59% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.026% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.052% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.23% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.16% fail on Condition
    • 0.078% fail on Attachment
  • 0.026% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.026% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review

  • Fiat Doblo (2010 on)
    Huge space. Massively practical. Great diesel engines. Decent ride quality and hardwearing interior.