FIAT Doblo MOT Results

Registered in 2016
74.3% pass rate
from 3,642 tests in 2020
(9.0% worse than other 2016 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Doblo is unusually good or bad.

  • 6.8% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (22% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim (8.9% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim (7.9% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (19% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamps (12% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp (16% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Direction indicators (1.2% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Flashing type (1.2% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 1.0% fail on Side repeaters (20% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.22% fail on Individual direction indicators (42% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.85% fail on Stop lamp (57% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.44% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (73% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Electrical equipment (41% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.082% fail on Electrical wiring (70% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.055% fail on Trailer electrical socket (37% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.027% fail on Horn
    • 0.14% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (77% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Rear fog lamp (82% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.11% fail on Rear fog lamp (82% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.027% fail on Front fog lamps
        • 0.027% fail on Front fog lamps
    • 0.11% fail on Position lamps (51% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Position lamp (49% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Reversing lamps (26% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Reversing lamps (24% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.082% fail on Hazard warning (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.082% fail on Switch (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.082% fail on Rear reflectors (56% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.027% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.027% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 6.6% fail on Suspension (100% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Springs (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 4.3% fail on Coil springs (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 4.3% fail on Coil spring (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.80% fail on Macpherson strut (14 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.47% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (17 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Pins and bushes (17 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.027% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.60% fail on Suspension arms (22% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Pins and bushes (61% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint (74% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.082% fail on Ball joint dust cover (26% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.60% fail on Anti-roll bars (25% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Linkage ball joints (15% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.055% fail on Linkage (140% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.055% fail on Ball joint (20% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.055% fail on Ball joint dust cover (76% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.027% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.36% fail on Shock absorbers (45% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Other suspension component (53% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Other suspension component (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.027% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.027% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.14% fail on Wheel bearings (18% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.027% fail on Axles
      • 0.027% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.027% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.027% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.027% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 5.5% fail on Tyres (25% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Condition (56% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Tread depth (0.71% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.14% fail on Size/type (38% worse than other 2016 vans)
  • 5.4% fail on Brakes (7.1% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Pedal (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.49% fail on Hand lever (7 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Mechanical brake components (51% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Brake linings and pads (57% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Brake pads (57% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.69% fail on Brake discs and drums (8.1% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.69% fail on Brake discs (7.5% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.082% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (7.6% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.055% fail on Lever (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.027% fail on Cable
    • 1.4% fail on Brake performance (31% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance (63% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt (66% worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.66% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.60% fail on Service brake performance (14% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (72% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.36% fail on Rbt (sp) (71% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (42% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.11% fail on Rbt (sp) (40% better than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.055% fail on Service brake performance (51% better than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.055% fail on Service brake imbalance (40% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Parking brake performance (70% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.11% fail on Rbt (69% better than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.082% fail on Parking brake performance (73% better than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.027% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.027% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.80% fail on Parking brake control (150% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.80% fail on Lever (150% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.30% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (17% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Electronic stability control (5.0% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Anti-lock braking system (47% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.027% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.027% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.027% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.027% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.027% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.027% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.027% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.027% fail on Other components
  • 3.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (120% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Exhaust emissions (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Compression ignition (140% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (82% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.85% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.16% fail on Emissions not tested (150% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.14% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (6 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.055% fail on Emission control equipment (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.055% fail on Particulate filter (8 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.027% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.027% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 0.82% fail on Spark ignition (120% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.74% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (100% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.055% fail on Catalyst emissions (12 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.027% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.055% fail on Fluid leaks (49% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.055% fail on Engine oil leaks (31% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.027% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.027% fail on Undertray
  • 3.3% fail on Visibility (34% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Washers (5.2% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Wipers (51% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.27% fail on View to rear (29% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Mirrors (35% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.027% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.082% fail on Condition of glass (78% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.082% fail on Windscreen (78% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.055% fail on Driver's view (12% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.055% fail on Bonnet (8.8% worse than other 2016 vans)
  • 1.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure (16% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.58% fail on Fuel system (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.55% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (12 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.027% fail on Tank
    • 0.52% fail on Exhaust system (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.19% fail on Body (39% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Other body component (25% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Engine mounting (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Engine mounting condition (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.027% fail on Bracket
    • 0.14% fail on Transmission (76% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Drive shafts (75% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.14% fail on Joints (74% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.082% fail on Doors (30% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.082% fail on Front passenger's door (100% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.055% fail on Door condition (47% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.027% fail on Catch
    • 0.027% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.027% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.027% fail on Carrier
    • 0.027% fail on Seats
      • 0.027% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.027% fail on Passenger compartment
    • 0.027% fail on Undertray
  • 0.49% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (35% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.33% fail on Seat belts (36% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Condition (37% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.027% fail on Attachment
    • 0.16% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (31% better than other 2016 vans)
  • 0.38% fail on Steering (31% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Steering gear (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Operation (13 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Power steering (14% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.082% fail on Other components (140% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.055% fail on Pipes and hoses (35% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.027% fail on Rams
    • 0.082% fail on Steering linkage components (77% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.055% fail on Track rod end (83% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.027% fail on Locking devices
  • 0.19% fail on Road Wheels (50% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Condition (140% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.082% fail on Attachment (0.60% better than other 2016 vans)
  • 0.11% fail on Identification of the vehicle (62% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Registration plates (62% better than other 2016 vans)
Read the Honest John Review

  • Fiat Doblo (2010 on)
    Huge space. Massively practical. Great diesel engines. Decent ride quality and hardwearing interior.