FIAT Ducato MOT Results
Registered in 198647.7% pass rate
from 88 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1986 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Ducato is unusually good or bad.
-
38% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(94% worse than other 1986 vans)
-
16% fail on
Direction indicators
(3 times worse than other 1986 vans)
-
16% fail on
Flashing type
(3 times worse than other 1986 vans)
- 6.8% fail on Side repeaters (7 times worse than other 1986 vans)
- 5.7% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 4.5% fail on All direction indicators (4 times worse than other 1986 vans)
-
16% fail on
Flashing type
(3 times worse than other 1986 vans)
-
15% fail on
Electrical equipment
(3 times worse than other 1986 vans)
- 9.1% fail on Battery(ies) (6 times worse than other 1986 vans)
- 5.7% fail on Horn
-
13% fail on
Headlamps
(180% worse than other 1986 vans)
- 13% fail on Headlamp (180% worse than other 1986 vans)
- 9.1% fail on Stop lamp (190% worse than other 1986 vans)
-
8.0% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
8.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 8.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
8.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
4.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim
- 4.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.1% fail on
Position lamps
- 1.1% fail on Position lamp
-
1.1% fail on
Hazard warning
- 1.1% fail on Switch
-
16% fail on
Direction indicators
(3 times worse than other 1986 vans)
-
27% fail on
Brakes
(80% worse than other 1986 vans)
-
19% fail on
Brake performance
-
14% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(2 times worse than other 1986 vans)
-
14% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(2 times worse than other 1986 vans)
- 10% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 1986 vans)
- 4.5% fail on Service brake performance
-
14% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(2 times worse than other 1986 vans)
-
8.0% fail on
Service brake performance
-
8.0% fail on
Rbt
- 6.8% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
8.0% fail on
Rbt
-
8.0% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 8.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
1.1% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt
- 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt
-
14% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(2 times worse than other 1986 vans)
- 4.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
2.3% fail on
Parking brake control
- 2.3% fail on Lever
- 2.3% fail on Load sensing valves (5 times worse than other 1986 vans)
-
1.1% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 1.1% fail on Operation
-
1.1% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 1.1% fail on Brake fluid
-
1.1% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.1% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.1% fail on Brake discs
-
1.1% fail on
Brake discs and drums
-
19% fail on
Brake performance
-
22% fail on
Visibility
(78% worse than other 1986 vans)
- 15% fail on Wipers (140% worse than other 1986 vans)
- 11% fail on Washers
- 3.4% fail on Bonnet (8 times worse than other 1986 vans)
-
2.3% fail on
View to rear
- 2.3% fail on Mirrors
-
20% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
9.1% fail on
Transmission
(2 times worse than other 1986 vans)
-
9.1% fail on
Drive shafts
(3 times worse than other 1986 vans)
- 9.1% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 1986 vans)
-
9.1% fail on
Drive shafts
(3 times worse than other 1986 vans)
- 8.0% fail on Exhaust system
-
4.5% fail on
Fuel system
(2 times worse than other 1986 vans)
- 4.5% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (9 times worse than other 1986 vans)
-
3.4% fail on
Seats
- 3.4% fail on Driver's seat
-
1.1% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 1.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
1.1% fail on
Body
- 1.1% fail on Panel
-
9.1% fail on
Transmission
(2 times worse than other 1986 vans)
-
17% fail on
Suspension
- 11% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
4.5% fail on
Other suspension component
(5 times worse than other 1986 vans)
- 3.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover (8 times worse than other 1986 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Ball joint
- 1.1% fail on Wheel bearings
- 1.1% fail on Shock absorbers
-
1.1% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.1% fail on Ball joint
-
4.5% fail on
Tyres
- 2.3% fail on Condition
- 1.1% fail on Size/type
- 1.1% fail on Tread depth
-
3.4% fail on
Steering
-
2.3% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 2.3% fail on Track rod end
-
1.1% fail on
Steering gear
- 1.1% fail on Steering rack
-
2.3% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
3.4% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
3.4% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.1% fail on Prescribed areas
- 1.1% fail on Attachment
- 1.1% fail on Condition
-
3.4% fail on
Seat belts
-
2.3% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
2.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.3% fail on
Spark ignition
- 2.3% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
2.3% fail on
Spark ignition
-
2.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
1.1% fail on
Road Wheels
- 1.1% fail on Attachment