FIAT Ducato MOT Results

Registered in 1988
50.9% pass rate
from 389 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1988 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Ducato is unusually good or bad.

  • 37% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (41% worse than other 1988 vans)
    • 13% fail on Headlamp aim (90% worse than other 1988 vans)
    • 12% fail on Position lamps (73% worse than other 1988 vans)
      • 6.7% fail on Front lamps (75% worse than other 1988 vans)
      • 5.9% fail on Rear lamps (83% worse than other 1988 vans)
    • 12% fail on Headlamps (100% worse than other 1988 vans)
      • 11% fail on Headlamp (120% worse than other 1988 vans)
      • 0.51% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.51% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
      • 0.51% fail on Switch
    • 9.3% fail on Direction indicators (130% worse than other 1988 vans)
      • 9.3% fail on Flashing type (130% worse than other 1988 vans)
        • 4.4% fail on Individual lamps (110% worse than other 1988 vans)
        • 3.1% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other 1988 vans)
        • 2.1% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.77% fail on Tell tales
    • 7.7% fail on Battery (120% worse than other 1988 vans)
    • 7.7% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 6.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 5.4% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.77% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.77% fail on Switch
    • 4.1% fail on Horn
    • 3.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.1% fail on Hazard warning
      • 2.1% fail on Lamp
      • 1.0% fail on Switch
      • 0.51% fail on Tell tale
    • 1.0% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 25% fail on Brakes (36% worse than other 1988 vans)
    • 18% fail on Brake performance (42% worse than other 1988 vans)
      • 11% fail on Rear wheels (100% worse than other 1988 vans)
      • 7.2% fail on Front wheels
      • 6.4% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 4.4% fail on Service brake performance (98% worse than other 1988 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.77% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 9.5% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 8.0% fail on Components
        • 3.6% fail on Valves (3 times worse than other 1988 vans)
        • 3.1% fail on Pipes
        • 1.8% fail on Hoses
      • 1.0% fail on Operation (3 times worse than other 1988 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Leaks
    • 1.5% fail on Hub components
      • 1.0% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.51% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.0% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.0% fail on Condition
    • 1.0% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.77% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
      • 0.26% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
    • 0.77% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.26% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.26% fail on Pedal
        • 0.26% fail on Condition
  • 23% fail on Suspension (31% worse than other 1988 vans)
    • 12% fail on Drive shafts (3 times worse than other 1988 vans)
      • 12% fail on Front drive shafts (3 times worse than other 1988 vans)
        • 11% fail on Constant velocity joints (3 times worse than other 1988 vans)
        • 0.26% fail on Couplings
    • 8.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 5.9% fail on Component mounting
      • 3.1% fail on Spring mounting
      • 0.51% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 3.6% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 2.3% fail on Rear
      • 1.3% fail on Front
    • 2.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.3% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.0% fail on Leaf springs
      • 0.51% fail on Pins and bushes
        • 0.51% fail on Shackle
      • 0.26% fail on Condition
      • 0.26% fail on Anchor bracket
    • 0.77% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.77% fail on Condition
    • 0.51% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.26% fail on Condition
      • 0.26% fail on Attachment
    • 0.26% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.26% fail on Condition
    • 0.26% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.26% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.26% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.26% fail on Condition
  • 16% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (56% worse than other 1988 vans)
    • 13% fail on Exhaust system (140% worse than other 1988 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Fuel system
      • 2.1% fail on Cap (4 times worse than other 1988 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Tank
      • 0.26% fail on Pipe
      • 0.26% fail on System
    • 2.3% fail on Emissions
    • 1.8% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 14% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 9.3% fail on Wipers
    • 7.2% fail on Washers
    • 0.77% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.77% fail on Mirrors
  • 8.2% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 4.9% fail on Body condition
    • 1.8% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.8% fail on Chassis
    • 1.5% fail on Seats
      • 1.0% fail on Drivers
      • 0.77% fail on Passengers
    • 0.51% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.51% fail on Doors
      • 0.26% fail on Drivers
      • 0.26% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.26% fail on Spare wheel
  • 5.1% fail on Tyres
    • 3.6% fail on Condition
    • 1.8% fail on Tread depth
  • 4.1% fail on Steering
    • 3.6% fail on Steering system
      • 2.6% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.77% fail on Steering rack (77% better than other 1988 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.26% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.26% fail on Power steering
      • 0.26% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.26% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 3.6% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 3.6% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.77% fail on Condition
      • 0.51% fail on Attachment
  • 0.51% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.51% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.26% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.26% fail on Condition