Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

FIAT Ducato MOT Results

Registered in 1989
49.3% pass rate
from 367 tests in 2020
(19% worse than other 1989 vans)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1989 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Ducato is unusually good or bad.

  • 33% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (51% worse than other 1989 vans)
    • 16% fail on Headlamps (2 times worse than other 1989 vans)
      • 15% fail on Headlamp (200% worse than other 1989 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Headlamp levelling device (8 times worse than other 1989 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Dipswitch
    • 7.6% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 4.6% fail on Battery(ies) (140% worse than other 1989 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on Horn
      • 0.54% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.27% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 7.1% fail on Direction indicators
      • 7.1% fail on Flashing type
        • 5.4% fail on Individual direction indicators (120% worse than other 1989 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.82% fail on Switch
        • 0.54% fail on All direction indicators
    • 6.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 6.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.82% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.1% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.54% fail on All position lamps
    • 4.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 4.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 4.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 3.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.6% fail on Hazard warning
      • 1.6% fail on Switch
    • 0.82% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.54% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
      • 0.27% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 23% fail on Body, chassis, structure (55% worse than other 1989 vans)
    • 11% fail on Exhaust system (130% worse than other 1989 vans)
    • 7.4% fail on Transmission (190% worse than other 1989 vans)
      • 7.4% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 1989 vans)
        • 7.4% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 1989 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Chassis
      • 3.0% fail on Chassis condition
    • 2.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.4% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.1% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.54% fail on Pipe
    • 1.1% fail on Body
      • 0.54% fail on Panel
      • 0.54% fail on Other body component
    • 1.1% fail on Seats
      • 1.1% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.27% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.82% fail on Doors
      • 0.82% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.82% fail on Door condition
    • 0.54% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.54% fail on Cabs
      • 0.54% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.27% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.27% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.27% fail on Floor
  • 19% fail on Brakes
    • 14% fail on Brake performance
      • 8.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 8.2% fail on Rbt
          • 7.4% fail on Service brake performance (67% worse than other 1989 vans)
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 5.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 5.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 3.8% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 4.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 4.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 2.2% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.2% fail on Rbt
          • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.27% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 6.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.4% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.4% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.54% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.54% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.27% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.27% fail on Cable
    • 1.6% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 1.4% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.82% fail on Pedal
      • 0.54% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.27% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.27% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.27% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
  • 14% fail on Suspension
    • 7.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.5% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.6% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.27% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.6% fail on Springs
      • 0.82% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.27% fail on Anchor bracket
        • 0.27% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
        • 0.27% fail on Shackle bracket
      • 0.54% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.54% fail on Coil spring
      • 0.54% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.82% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.27% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.27% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.27% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.54% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.27% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.27% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 14% fail on Visibility
    • 8.2% fail on Wipers (61% worse than other 1989 vans)
    • 6.8% fail on Washers
    • 0.27% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.27% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.27% fail on View to rear
      • 0.27% fail on Mirrors
  • 6.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.9% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.4% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.7% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.54% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.27% fail on Pre 01/01/1980 visual
        • 0.27% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.4% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.82% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.54% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.27% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.27% fail on Sound deadening material
  • 3.8% fail on Steering
    • 2.5% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.2% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.27% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.54% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.54% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.54% fail on Power steering
      • 0.54% fail on Operation
    • 0.27% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 3.3% fail on Tyres
    • 2.7% fail on Condition
    • 0.82% fail on Tread depth
  • 2.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.9% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.27% fail on Attachment
      • 0.27% fail on Condition
  • 0.54% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.27% fail on Registration plates
    • 0.27% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.27% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.27% fail on Speedometer