FIAT Ducato MOT Results
Registered in 199252.2% pass rate
from 362 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1992 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Ducato is unusually good or bad.
-
30% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(33% worse than other 1992 vans)
-
12% fail on
Headlamps
(160% worse than other 1992 vans)
- 12% fail on Headlamp (160% worse than other 1992 vans)
-
7.7% fail on
Headlamp aim
(74% worse than other 1992 vans)
- 6.1% fail on Headlamp aim
- 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (3 times worse than other 1992 vans)
-
7.2% fail on
Direction indicators
-
7.2% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.9% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 3.6% fail on Side repeaters (120% worse than other 1992 vans)
- 0.28% fail on All direction indicators
-
7.2% fail on
Flashing type
- 6.4% fail on Stop lamp
-
5.5% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 2.8% fail on Battery(ies)
- 2.8% fail on Horn
-
4.7% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
4.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 4.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
4.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 3.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.4% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.83% fail on Main beam tell-tale
- 0.83% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
0.55% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.55% fail on Switch
-
0.28% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.28% fail on Switch
-
0.28% fail on
Outline marker lamps
- 0.28% fail on Outline marker lamp
- 0.28% fail on Rear reflectors
-
12% fail on
Headlamps
(160% worse than other 1992 vans)
-
23% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(36% worse than other 1992 vans)
-
9.1% fail on
Transmission
(92% worse than other 1992 vans)
-
9.1% fail on
Drive shafts
(140% worse than other 1992 vans)
- 9.1% fail on Joints (150% worse than other 1992 vans)
-
9.1% fail on
Drive shafts
(140% worse than other 1992 vans)
- 7.5% fail on Exhaust system
-
3.9% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 3.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
1.7% fail on
Chassis
- 1.7% fail on Chassis condition
-
1.4% fail on
Body
- 1.1% fail on Panel
- 0.28% fail on Other body component
- 1.1% fail on Bumpers
-
1.1% fail on
Seats
- 1.1% fail on Passenger's seat
- 0.28% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.55% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.28% fail on Engine mounting condition
- 0.28% fail on Bracket
-
0.55% fail on
Doors
-
0.28% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.28% fail on Door condition
-
0.28% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.28% fail on Door condition
-
0.28% fail on
Driver's door
-
0.28% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.28% fail on Pipe
-
0.28% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.28% fail on Carrier
-
9.1% fail on
Transmission
(92% worse than other 1992 vans)
-
21% fail on
Brakes
-
16% fail on
Brake performance
-
8.6% fail on
Service brake performance
-
8.6% fail on
Rbt
- 7.5% fail on Service brake performance
- 2.5% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
8.6% fail on
Rbt
-
5.2% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
5.2% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 3.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 2.8% fail on Service brake performance
-
5.2% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
4.7% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 4.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.28% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
1.4% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt
- 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt
- 0.83% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
8.6% fail on
Service brake performance
- 4.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.4% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 1.1% fail on Pedal
- 0.28% fail on Hand lever
- 1.1% fail on Load sensing valves
-
1.1% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.83% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.83% fail on Brake discs
-
0.28% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.28% fail on Cable
-
0.83% fail on
Brake discs and drums
-
0.55% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.55% fail on Lever
-
0.28% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.28% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.28% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.28% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
-
0.28% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.28% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
-
0.28% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
16% fail on
Brake performance
-
12% fail on
Visibility
- 7.5% fail on Washers
- 5.8% fail on Wipers
- 0.55% fail on Bonnet
-
0.55% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.55% fail on Windscreen
-
12% fail on
Suspension
- 7.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 2.8% fail on Wheel bearings
-
2.2% fail on
Springs
- 1.1% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
0.83% fail on
Leaf springs
- 0.28% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
- 0.28% fail on Shackle bracket
- 0.28% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
-
0.28% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.28% fail on Coil spring
-
1.9% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.55% fail on Ball joint
- 0.28% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.83% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.83% fail on
Macpherson strut
(4 times worse than other 1992 vans)
- 0.83% fail on Macpherson strut (6 times worse than other 1992 vans)
-
0.28% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.28% fail on Pins and bushes
-
4.7% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
3.9% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
1.9% fail on
Spark ignition
- 1.1% fail on Non catalyst emissions
- 0.83% fail on Catalyst emissions
-
1.9% fail on
Compression ignition
- 1.4% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.55% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
-
1.9% fail on
Spark ignition
-
1.1% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 1.1% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
3.9% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.4% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
4.4% fail on
Seat belts
- 3.3% fail on Prescribed areas
- 1.1% fail on Condition
-
4.4% fail on
Seat belts
-
4.1% fail on
Steering
-
2.5% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 2.5% fail on Track rod end
-
1.9% fail on
Steering gear
- 1.9% fail on Steering rack
-
0.28% fail on
Power steering
- 0.28% fail on Other components
-
2.5% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
1.4% fail on
Tyres
- 0.55% fail on Condition
- 0.55% fail on Tread depth
- 0.28% fail on Size/type
-
0.28% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.28% fail on Registration plates