MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » FIAT » Ducato » 1994
Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

FIAT Ducato MOT Results

Registered in 1994
57.1% pass rate
from 436 tests in 2020
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1994 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Ducato is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 7.1% fail on Headlamps (94% worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 6.9% fail on Headlamp (99% worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 6.2% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 3.7% fail on Horn
      • 1.8% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.69% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 5.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 5.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.8% fail on Side repeaters (140% worse than other 1994 vans)
        • 2.3% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.46% fail on All direction indicators
    • 4.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.23% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.5% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.46% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.23% fail on Switch
    • 2.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.8% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (68% better than other 1994 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (68% better than other 1994 vans)
        • 1.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (68% better than other 1994 vans)
        • 0.23% fail on Switch
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.46% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.46% fail on Switch
    • 0.23% fail on Outline marker lamps
      • 0.23% fail on Outline marker lamp
    • 0.23% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.23% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 18% fail on Brakes
    • 12% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 6.7% fail on Rbt
          • 5.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 5.5% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 5.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 3.4% fail on Service brake performance
          • 2.8% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 1.1% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.92% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.92% fail on Rbt
          • 0.69% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.23% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
    • 6.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes (79% worse than other 1994 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 1.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.92% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.92% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.46% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.23% fail on Cable
        • 0.23% fail on Lever
        • 0.23% fail on Pivot
      • 0.23% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.23% fail on Brake pads
    • 0.46% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.46% fail on Hand lever (5 times worse than other 1994 vans)
    • 0.46% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.23% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.23% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.46% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.46% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.23% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.23% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.23% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.23% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
    • 0.23% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.23% fail on Electronic braking system
  • 15% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 6.9% fail on Transmission
      • 6.9% fail on Drive shafts (61% worse than other 1994 vans)
        • 6.7% fail on Joints
        • 0.23% fail on Drive shaft
    • 4.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.8% fail on Chassis
      • 1.8% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.4% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.69% fail on Pipe
      • 0.46% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.23% fail on Hose
    • 1.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure (65% better than other 1994 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (64% better than other 1994 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Engine mounting (6 times worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Engine mounting condition (9 times worse than other 1994 vans)
    • 0.69% fail on Body
      • 0.46% fail on Other body component
      • 0.23% fail on Body condition
    • 0.46% fail on Towbar
      • 0.23% fail on Towbar condition
      • 0.23% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.46% fail on Doors
      • 0.23% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.23% fail on Door condition
      • 0.23% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.23% fail on Door condition
    • 0.23% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.23% fail on Seats
      • 0.23% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.23% fail on Cabs
      • 0.23% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 11% fail on Suspension (31% better than other 1994 vans)
    • 5.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.0% fail on Wheel bearings (120% worse than other 1994 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.69% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.69% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.23% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.1% fail on Springs
      • 0.69% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.69% fail on Coil spring
      • 0.46% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.23% fail on Shackle bracket
        • 0.23% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
      • 0.46% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.92% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.46% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.46% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.23% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.23% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.23% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.23% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.23% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.23% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 8.5% fail on Visibility
    • 4.4% fail on Wipers
    • 4.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.46% fail on View to rear
      • 0.46% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.23% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.23% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.23% fail on Windscreen
  • 4.8% fail on Steering
    • 2.8% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.8% fail on Track rod end
    • 1.4% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.4% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.46% fail on Power steering
      • 0.23% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.23% fail on Other components
    • 0.23% fail on Steering column
    • 0.23% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.23% fail on Universal joint
  • 2.8% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.8% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.23% fail on Requirements
      • 0.23% fail on Condition
  • 2.5% fail on Tyres
    • 2.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.69% fail on Tread depth
  • 2.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 1.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.1% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.46% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.46% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.23% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.46% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.23% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.23% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.69% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.69% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.23% fail on Other leaks
  • 0.23% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.23% fail on Attachment