FIAT Ducato MOT Results

Registered in 1995
58.4% pass rate
from 385 tests in 2020
(12% better than other 1995 vans)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Ducato is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (0.36% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 7.5% fail on Electrical equipment (48% worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 4.7% fail on Horn (38% worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 2.9% fail on Battery(ies) (68% worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Electrical wiring (130% worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 4.7% fail on Headlamp aim (4.5% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim (7.8% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (30% worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Headlamps (0.70% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 3.4% fail on Headlamp (20% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Headlamp levelling device (4 times worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Direction indicators (23% worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 4.2% fail on Flashing type (23% worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 2.3% fail on Side repeaters (97% worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 2.1% fail on Individual direction indicators (2.7% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (33% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 4.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (33% better than other 1995 vans)
        • 3.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (35% better than other 1995 vans)
        • 0.52% fail on Switch (89% worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Stop lamp (29% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (8.2% worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 0.78% fail on Hazard warning (150% worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.78% fail on Switch (150% worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 0.52% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (39% worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (81% worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 0.26% fail on Outline marker lamps
      • 0.26% fail on Outline marker lamp
  • 16% fail on Brakes (2.0% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 9.6% fail on Brake performance (9.7% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 5.7% fail on Service brake performance (6.6% worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 5.7% fail on Rbt (8.7% worse than other 1995 vans)
          • 4.7% fail on Service brake performance (9.4% worse than other 1995 vans)
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance (10% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 3.6% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (30% better than other 1995 vans)
        • 3.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (29% better than other 1995 vans)
          • 2.3% fail on Service brake performance (15% better than other 1995 vans)
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance (55% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (23% better than other 1995 vans)
        • 2.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (15% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Parking brake performance (43% better than other 1995 vans)
        • 0.52% fail on Rbt (41% better than other 1995 vans)
          • 0.52% fail on Parking brake performance (30% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes (40% worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Mechanical brake components (32% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Brake discs and drums (20% better than other 1995 vans)
        • 0.52% fail on Brake discs (17% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (3.3% better than other 1995 vans)
        • 0.26% fail on Cable
        • 0.26% fail on Pivot
      • 0.26% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.26% fail on Brake pads
    • 0.78% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (13% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.78% fail on Pedal (9.4% worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 0.78% fail on Hydraulic systems (45% worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Brake fluid (66% worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Valves
    • 0.78% fail on Flexible brake hoses (42% worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 0.78% fail on Load sensing valves (41% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 0.26% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.26% fail on Lever
    • 0.26% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.26% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.26% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
    • 0.26% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.26% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 14% fail on Body, chassis, structure (10.0% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Transmission (49% worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 4.2% fail on Drive shafts (100% worse than other 1995 vans)
        • 4.2% fail on Joints (110% worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure (4.2% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 3.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (3.6% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Exhaust system (22% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Chassis (12% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 3.1% fail on Chassis condition (12% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.52% fail on Engine mounting (7 times worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Engine mounting condition (12 times worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 0.52% fail on Doors (36% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.26% fail on Door condition
      • 0.26% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.26% fail on Door condition
    • 0.26% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.26% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.26% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.26% fail on Towbar
      • 0.26% fail on Vehicle structure
  • 14% fail on Visibility (47% worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 8.6% fail on Wipers (63% worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 5.2% fail on Washers (37% worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 0.52% fail on View to rear (9.4% worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Mirrors (9.4% worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 0.26% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.26% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.26% fail on Window
  • 9.6% fail on Suspension (49% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 4.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (51% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Wheel bearings (0.98% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Shock absorbers (8.6% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Suspension arms (76% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Ball joint (74% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.26% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.0% fail on Sub-frames (6.6% worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.78% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (2.5% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.52% fail on Macpherson strut (4 times worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (19 times worse than other 1995 vans)
    • 0.52% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension (9 times worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Suspension unit
      • 0.26% fail on Bellows
    • 0.26% fail on Springs
      • 0.26% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.26% fail on Leaf spring
  • 2.3% fail on Steering (59% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Power steering (20% worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.78% fail on Other components (78% worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Operation (12% worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 1.0% fail on Steering linkage components (59% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.78% fail on Track rod end (61% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Ball joint
  • 2.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (46% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Exhaust emissions (61% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Compression ignition (49% better than other 1995 vans)
        • 0.78% fail on Emissions not tested (15% better than other 1995 vans)
        • 0.26% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 0.26% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.26% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 1.0% fail on Fluid leaks (7.6% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.78% fail on Other leaks (2 times worse than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 1.8% fail on Tyres (53% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 0.78% fail on Condition (59% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 0.78% fail on Tread depth (59% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 0.26% fail on Size/type
  • 1.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (64% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Seat belts (63% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Prescribed areas (69% better than other 1995 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Condition (26% better than other 1995 vans)
  • 0.52% fail on Identification of the vehicle (41% better than other 1995 vans)
    • 0.52% fail on Registration plates (39% better than other 1995 vans)