FIAT Ducato MOT Results
Registered in 199655.4% pass rate
from 737 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Ducato is unusually good or bad.
-
22% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
7.3% fail on
Electrical equipment
(63% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 5.4% fail on Horn (81% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 1.6% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.54% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.14% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
5.6% fail on
Direction indicators
-
5.6% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.1% fail on Side repeaters (160% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 2.3% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.41% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.14% fail on Switch
-
5.6% fail on
Flashing type
-
4.6% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.3% fail on Headlamp
- 1.6% fail on Headlamp levelling device (5 times worse than other 1996 vans)
- 4.2% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.9% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.41% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
3.5% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
3.5% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 3.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
3.5% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.54% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.54% fail on Switch
-
0.14% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.14% fail on Position lamp
-
0.14% fail on
Outline marker lamps
- 0.14% fail on Outline marker lamp
- 0.14% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.14% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.14% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
7.3% fail on
Electrical equipment
(63% worse than other 1996 vans)
-
17% fail on
Brakes
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
-
6.4% fail on
Service brake performance
-
6.2% fail on
Rbt
- 5.7% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.95% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.14% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.14% fail on Service brake performance
-
6.2% fail on
Rbt
-
3.8% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(38% better than other 1996 vans)
-
3.8% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(37% better than other 1996 vans)
- 2.2% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.8% fail on Service brake imbalance (50% better than other 1996 vans)
-
3.8% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(37% better than other 1996 vans)
-
3.4% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 3.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.14% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
- 1.2% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
1.1% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt
- 0.81% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.27% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt
-
6.4% fail on
Service brake performance
- 5.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes (50% worse than other 1996 vans)
-
2.7% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.5% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.81% fail on Cable
- 0.27% fail on Lever (6 times worse than other 1996 vans)
- 0.27% fail on Pivot (6 times worse than other 1996 vans)
- 0.14% fail on Linkage
-
0.81% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.81% fail on Brake discs
-
0.41% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.27% fail on Brake pads
- 0.14% fail on Brake linings
-
1.5% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 1.2% fail on Load sensing valves
-
0.68% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
-
0.54% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.27% fail on Other braking system component
- 0.14% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
- 0.14% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
- 0.14% fail on Other components
-
0.54% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
0.54% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.41% fail on Valves
- 0.14% fail on Servos
- 0.54% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.41% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.27% fail on Hand lever
- 0.14% fail on Pedal
-
0.41% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.41% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
0.27% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.27% fail on Lever
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
-
13% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 4.2% fail on Exhaust system
-
3.4% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 3.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
2.7% fail on
Transmission
-
2.7% fail on
Drive shafts
- 2.4% fail on Joints
- 0.14% fail on Drive shaft
- 0.14% fail on Bearing housing
-
2.7% fail on
Drive shafts
-
2.6% fail on
Chassis
- 2.6% fail on Chassis condition
-
1.1% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.41% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.41% fail on System
- 0.27% fail on Pipe
-
0.95% fail on
Seats
- 0.54% fail on Passenger's seat
- 0.41% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.68% fail on
Cabs
- 0.54% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.14% fail on Steps
-
0.41% fail on
Body
- 0.14% fail on Body condition
- 0.14% fail on Panel
- 0.14% fail on Other body component
-
0.41% fail on
Doors
-
0.27% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.27% fail on Door condition
-
0.14% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.14% fail on Catch
-
0.14% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.14% fail on Catch
-
0.27% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
0.27% fail on
Towbar
- 0.14% fail on Towbar condition
- 0.14% fail on Other towbar components
- 0.14% fail on Bumpers
-
0.14% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.14% fail on Spare wheel condition
-
0.14% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.14% fail on Engine mounting condition
- 0.14% fail on Floor
-
13% fail on
Suspension
(23% better than other 1996 vans)
- 7.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
3.3% fail on
Sub-frames
(2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
- 3.0% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (200% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 0.41% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.14% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 1.9% fail on Wheel bearings
- 1.9% fail on Shock absorbers
-
1.1% fail on
Suspension arms
(66% better than other 1996 vans)
- 0.41% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.27% fail on Ball joint (83% better than other 1996 vans)
- 0.27% fail on Ball joint dust cover (80% better than other 1996 vans)
- 0.14% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.95% fail on
Springs
- 0.81% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
0.14% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.14% fail on Coil spring
-
0.54% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.27% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.14% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.14% fail on Ball joint
- 0.14% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.14% fail on
Air/gas/fluid suspension
- 0.14% fail on Operation
-
12% fail on
Visibility
- 7.9% fail on Wipers
- 6.2% fail on Washers
-
0.41% fail on
View to rear
- 0.41% fail on Mirrors
- 0.27% fail on Bonnet
-
4.7% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
4.7% fail on
Seat belts
- 3.1% fail on Prescribed areas
- 1.4% fail on Condition
- 0.27% fail on Attachment
-
4.7% fail on
Seat belts
-
2.6% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(47% better than other 1996 vans)
-
1.9% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(52% better than other 1996 vans)
-
1.4% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.81% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.41% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.14% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
-
0.68% fail on
Spark ignition
(66% better than other 1996 vans)
- 0.27% fail on Non catalyst emissions
- 0.27% fail on Catalyst emissions (82% better than other 1996 vans)
- 0.14% fail on Emissions not tested
-
1.4% fail on
Compression ignition
-
1.1% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.54% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.54% fail on Other leaks
-
1.9% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(52% better than other 1996 vans)
-
2.0% fail on
Steering
(63% better than other 1996 vans)
-
1.1% fail on
Power steering
- 0.68% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.41% fail on Other components
-
0.54% fail on
Steering gear
(73% better than other 1996 vans)
- 0.54% fail on Steering rack (72% better than other 1996 vans)
-
0.54% fail on
Steering linkage components
(78% better than other 1996 vans)
- 0.41% fail on Track rod end (80% better than other 1996 vans)
- 0.14% fail on Drag link end
-
1.1% fail on
Power steering
-
2.0% fail on
Tyres
- 1.2% fail on Condition
- 0.54% fail on Tread depth
- 0.27% fail on Size/type
-
0.14% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.14% fail on Registration plates
-
0.14% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.14% fail on Attachment