Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

FIAT Ducato MOT Results

Registered in 1996
55.8% pass rate
from 794 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Ducato is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 6.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.5% fail on Rear lamps
      • 3.0% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.63% fail on All position lamps
    • 6.0% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 4.9% fail on Horn
    • 4.8% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.6% fail on Individual lamps
        • 2.0% fail on Side repeaters (100% worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Battery
    • 2.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (54% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Fog lamp (59% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.76% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.25% fail on Switch
    • 2.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamps (43% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp (43% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.13% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 1.5% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.88% fail on Switch
      • 0.76% fail on Lamp
      • 0.13% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.76% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.13% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.13% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 17% fail on Brakes
    • 11% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.2% fail on Rear wheels
      • 4.5% fail on Front wheels
      • 3.1% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.3% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.38% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 7.7% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 7.6% fail on Components
        • 5.8% fail on Pipes
        • 1.3% fail on Hoses
        • 1.0% fail on Valves
      • 0.38% fail on Leaks
      • 0.13% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 1.3% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.76% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.76% fail on Pedal
        • 0.50% fail on Condition
        • 0.25% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.63% fail on Hub components (72% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Brake pads (73% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.50% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.38% fail on Cable
      • 0.13% fail on Pivot
    • 0.13% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.13% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.13% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
  • 17% fail on Suspension (23% better than other 1996 vans)
    • 9.6% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 4.8% fail on Component mounting (43% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 3.4% fail on Spring mounting
      • 2.9% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 3.3% fail on Wheel bearings (93% worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Rear (180% worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Front
    • 2.0% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.0% fail on Condition
    • 1.8% fail on Drive shafts
      • 1.8% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 1.8% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 1.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.5% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.25% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.25% fail on Condition
    • 0.13% fail on Leaf springs
      • 0.13% fail on Condition
    • 0.13% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.13% fail on Linkage condition
    • 0.13% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.13% fail on Condition
  • 15% fail on Driver's view of the road (38% worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 8.4% fail on Wipers (38% worse than other 1996 vans)
    • 5.4% fail on Washers
    • 1.1% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.38% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.25% fail on Bonnet
  • 7.3% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 5.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.1% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.76% fail on Cap
      • 0.38% fail on System
    • 0.88% fail on Emissions
    • 0.25% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 6.4% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 3.5% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 3.5% fail on Chassis
    • 2.6% fail on Body condition
    • 0.25% fail on Seats
      • 0.13% fail on Passengers
      • 0.13% fail on Drivers
    • 0.13% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.13% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.13% fail on Doors
      • 0.13% fail on Drivers
  • 3.9% fail on Steering (37% better than other 1996 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Power steering
      • 1.1% fail on Pipes and hoses (3 times worse than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.88% fail on Operation
      • 0.13% fail on Other components
    • 1.5% fail on Steering system (68% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.88% fail on Track rod end (59% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Steering rack (87% better than other 1996 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.13% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.38% fail on Steering control
      • 0.38% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.38% fail on Universal joint
      • 0.13% fail on Steering column
    • 0.38% fail on Steering operation
  • 3.8% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 3.8% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.0% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.50% fail on Condition
      • 0.25% fail on Attachment
  • 2.9% fail on Tyres (51% better than other 1996 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.63% fail on Tread depth (79% better than other 1996 vans)
    • 0.13% fail on Size/type
  • 0.76% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.76% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.13% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.13% fail on Attachment