FIAT Ducato MOT Results

Registered in 2003
66.1% pass rate
from 4,038 tests in 2020
(34% better than other 2003 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Ducato is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (39% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Stop lamp (49% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim (40% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim (41% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.5% fail on Direction indicators (31% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Flashing type (31% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 1.9% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.42% fail on Side repeaters (59% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (27% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (27% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 2.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (28% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.074% fail on Switch
      • 0.025% fail on Front fog lamps
        • 0.025% fail on Front fog lamps
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamps (49% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp (50% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.050% fail on Dipswitch
      • 0.025% fail on Matched pair
    • 1.9% fail on Electrical equipment (33% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Horn (30% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.37% fail on Battery(ies) (47% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.074% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 1.7% fail on Outline marker lamps (3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Outline marker lamp (4 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.050% fail on All outline marker lamps
    • 1.7% fail on Position lamps (57% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Position lamp (59% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.099% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.025% fail on Switch
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (74% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.074% fail on Rear reflectors (80% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.050% fail on Hazard warning (91% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.050% fail on Switch (91% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.025% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.025% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 12% fail on Brakes (41% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 8.9% fail on Brake performance (27% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 4.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.2% fail on Rbt
          • 3.6% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.89% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.025% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.025% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.025% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.025% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 3.4% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (30% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 3.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (31% better than other 2003 vans)
          • 2.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance (52% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.099% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 3.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (43% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 3.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (44% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.87% fail on Parking brake performance (61% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.84% fail on Rbt (61% better than other 2003 vans)
          • 0.57% fail on Parking brake performance (70% better than other 2003 vans)
          • 0.25% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.025% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.025% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.025% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.22% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.2% fail on Load sensing valves (49% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes (82% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Mechanical brake components (70% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.47% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.37% fail on Cable
        • 0.050% fail on Pivot
        • 0.025% fail on Lever
        • 0.025% fail on Linkage
      • 0.42% fail on Brake linings and pads (75% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.42% fail on Brake pads (75% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Brake discs and drums (82% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.22% fail on Brake discs (83% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.025% fail on Brake drums
    • 0.52% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.52% fail on Lever
    • 0.42% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.35% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.30% fail on Other braking system component
        • 0.050% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
      • 0.074% fail on Other components
    • 0.32% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.30% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.30% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.22% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (69% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.074% fail on Pedal (86% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.025% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.025% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.025% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.025% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 10% fail on Suspension (53% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 5.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (15% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.5% fail on Sub-frames (99% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (150% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.074% fail on Sub-frame
    • 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.2% fail on Suspension arms (81% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.50% fail on Ball joint (87% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Pins and bushes (76% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Ball joint dust cover (75% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.97% fail on Springs (75% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.50% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.42% fail on Leaf springs (52% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.20% fail on Leaf spring
        • 0.12% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
        • 0.099% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
        • 0.050% fail on Shackle bracket
        • 0.025% fail on Anchor bracket
      • 0.050% fail on Coil springs (98% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.050% fail on Coil spring (98% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.30% fail on Other suspension component (67% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint (57% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.074% fail on Ball joint dust cover (74% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.025% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.15% fail on Anti-roll bars (97% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.050% fail on Linkage (89% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.025% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.025% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.025% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.025% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 0.050% fail on Macpherson strut (84% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.025% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.025% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.025% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.025% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.025% fail on Levelling valve
  • 8.1% fail on Body, chassis, structure (47% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.025% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 2.1% fail on Transmission (60% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Drive shafts (55% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 2.0% fail on Joints (55% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Prop shafts (87% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Joints
    • 2.0% fail on Chassis (24% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Chassis condition
      • 0.050% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 1.9% fail on Exhaust system (49% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.32% fail on Cabs
      • 0.20% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.12% fail on Steps
    • 0.30% fail on Fuel system (69% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.099% fail on Pipe
      • 0.074% fail on Tank
      • 0.025% fail on System
    • 0.30% fail on Body (68% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Panel
      • 0.12% fail on Other body component (75% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.025% fail on Body condition
      • 0.025% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 0.27% fail on Seats
      • 0.15% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.12% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.099% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.074% fail on Carrier
      • 0.025% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.099% fail on Doors (89% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.050% fail on Front passenger's door (82% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.050% fail on Door condition (81% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.050% fail on Other passenger's door (87% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.050% fail on Door condition (86% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.074% fail on Bumpers (84% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.050% fail on Towbar (80% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.050% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.050% fail on Undertray
    • 0.025% fail on Floor
  • 6.5% fail on Visibility (40% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Wipers (26% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Washers (52% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.45% fail on View to rear (46% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.45% fail on Mirrors (45% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.099% fail on Condition of glass (81% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.074% fail on Windscreen (85% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.025% fail on Window
    • 0.050% fail on Driver's view (79% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.050% fail on Bonnet (79% better than other 2003 vans)
  • 1.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (64% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Seat belts (53% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas (50% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Condition (73% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.074% fail on Attachment
      • 0.074% fail on Requirements
    • 0.27% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (84% better than other 2003 vans)
  • 1.7% fail on Tyres (75% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.89% fail on Condition (67% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.77% fail on Tread depth (82% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.050% fail on Size/type (86% better than other 2003 vans)
  • 1.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (75% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Exhaust emissions (76% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Compression ignition (73% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.52% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (78% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.22% fail on Emissions not tested (74% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.20% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.099% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.025% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.025% fail on Catalytic converter
      • 0.074% fail on Spark ignition (91% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.050% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (89% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.025% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.27% fail on Fluid leaks (78% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Engine oil leaks (88% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.074% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.050% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.025% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
    • 0.025% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.025% fail on Undertray
  • 1.3% fail on Steering (81% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.62% fail on Steering linkage components (88% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Track rod end (88% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.074% fail on Ball joint (77% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.42% fail on Power steering
      • 0.30% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.099% fail on Operation
      • 0.074% fail on Other components
      • 0.025% fail on Rams
    • 0.25% fail on Steering gear (80% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Steering rack (85% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.074% fail on Operation
    • 0.050% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.025% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.42% fail on Identification of the vehicle (62% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.40% fail on Registration plates (64% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.025% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.17% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.15% fail on Attachment
    • 0.050% fail on Condition
  • 0.025% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.025% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.025% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.025% fail on Anchorages