FIAT Ducato MOT Results
Registered in 201077.5% pass rate
from 4,254 tests in 2021
(53% better than other 2010 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Ducato is unusually good or bad.
-
9.0% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(53% better than other 2010 vans)
-
2.8% fail on
Headlamp aim
(24% better than other 2010 vans)
- 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim (21% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.16% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
2.4% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.4% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.2% fail on Side repeaters
- 1.2% fail on Individual direction indicators (42% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.094% fail on All direction indicators
-
2.4% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (59% better than other 2010 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Stop lamp (75% better than other 2010 vans)
-
1.2% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(44% better than other 2010 vans)
-
1.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(44% better than other 2010 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (44% better than other 2010 vans)
-
1.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(44% better than other 2010 vans)
-
1.2% fail on
Headlamps
(66% better than other 2010 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Headlamp (67% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.094% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
0.63% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.63% fail on Reversing lamps
-
0.38% fail on
Electrical equipment
(59% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.16% fail on Horn (73% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.12% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.071% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.024% fail on Battery(ies)
-
0.14% fail on
Position lamps
(67% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.14% fail on Position lamp (65% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.094% fail on Rear reflectors (70% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.071% fail on
Outline marker lamps
- 0.071% fail on Outline marker lamp
-
0.047% fail on
Hazard warning
(86% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.047% fail on Switch (86% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.024% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.024% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
2.8% fail on
Headlamp aim
(24% better than other 2010 vans)
-
6.4% fail on
Brakes
(57% better than other 2010 vans)
-
5.4% fail on
Brake performance
(31% better than other 2010 vans)
-
4.0% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(22% better than other 2010 vans)
- 4.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (22% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.047% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
1.3% fail on
Service brake performance
(46% better than other 2010 vans)
-
1.3% fail on
Rbt
(45% better than other 2010 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Service brake performance (40% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.24% fail on Service brake imbalance (58% better than other 2010 vans)
-
1.3% fail on
Rbt
(45% better than other 2010 vans)
-
1.2% fail on
Parking brake performance
(36% better than other 2010 vans)
-
1.2% fail on
Rbt
(37% better than other 2010 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance (35% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.047% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.024% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.071% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.071% fail on Parking brake performance
-
1.2% fail on
Rbt
(37% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.80% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.80% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.68% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.19% fail on Service brake imbalance (60% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.80% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.047% fail on Brake performance not tested (84% better than other 2010 vans)
-
4.0% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(22% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.94% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(79% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.56% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(81% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.56% fail on Brake pads (81% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.24% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.12% fail on Cable
- 0.071% fail on Lever
- 0.047% fail on Linkage
- 0.024% fail on Relay lever
- 0.024% fail on Pivot
-
0.21% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(87% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.21% fail on Brake discs (87% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.56% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(81% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.33% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(76% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.31% fail on Anti-lock braking system (74% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.024% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.28% fail on Rigid brake pipes (92% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.26% fail on
Parking brake control
(54% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.24% fail on Lever (58% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.024% fail on Electronic parking brake
-
0.19% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(71% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.16% fail on Pedal (67% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.024% fail on Hand lever
-
0.071% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.024% fail on Other components
-
0.024% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.024% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
- 0.024% fail on Additional braking device
-
0.047% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.024% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.024% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.047% fail on Flexible brake hoses (81% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.024% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.024% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
5.4% fail on
Brake performance
(31% better than other 2010 vans)
-
4.7% fail on
Visibility
(45% better than other 2010 vans)
- 2.5% fail on Wipers (36% better than other 2010 vans)
- 1.9% fail on Washers (55% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.47% fail on
View to rear
- 0.47% fail on Mirrors
-
0.14% fail on
Condition of glass
(71% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.094% fail on Windscreen (80% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.047% fail on Window
- 0.047% fail on Bonnet
-
4.5% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(25% better than other 2010 vans)
-
4.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(24% better than other 2010 vans)
-
3.5% fail on
Compression ignition
(21% better than other 2010 vans)
- 1.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 1.5% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 0.28% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.024% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.024% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve
- 0.024% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
-
0.75% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.71% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.024% fail on Non catalyst emissions
- 0.024% fail on Catalyst emissions
-
3.5% fail on
Compression ignition
(21% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.45% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.24% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.16% fail on Other leaks (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.024% fail on Transmission oil leaks
- 0.024% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
-
0.024% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.024% fail on Sound deadening material
-
4.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(24% better than other 2010 vans)
-
4.0% fail on
Suspension
(77% better than other 2010 vans)
-
2.1% fail on
Suspension arms
(63% better than other 2010 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes (48% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.85% fail on Ball joint (71% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.38% fail on Ball joint dust cover (59% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.85% fail on
Springs
(82% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.45% fail on
Coil springs
(85% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.45% fail on Coil spring (85% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.40% fail on
Leaf springs
(77% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.24% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
- 0.12% fail on Leaf spring (92% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.071% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
- 0.024% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
0.45% fail on
Coil springs
(85% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.47% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.35% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.21% fail on Ball joint
- 0.12% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.024% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.26% fail on Wheel bearings (84% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.21% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(97% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.12% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (79% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.071% fail on Linkage ball joints (97% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.024% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.024% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.21% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (82% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.071% fail on
Macpherson strut
(78% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.047% fail on Macpherson strut
- 0.024% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.071% fail on
Air/gas/fluid suspension
(3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.047% fail on Operation (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.024% fail on Suspension unit
- 0.024% fail on Bellows
-
0.024% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.024% fail on Ball joint
-
2.1% fail on
Suspension arms
(63% better than other 2010 vans)
-
2.8% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(65% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.99% fail on Exhaust system (33% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.87% fail on
Transmission
(78% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.80% fail on
Drive shafts
(77% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.80% fail on Joints (77% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.071% fail on
Prop shafts
(86% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.071% fail on Joints
-
0.80% fail on
Drive shafts
(77% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.35% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.19% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.12% fail on System (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.024% fail on Tank
- 0.024% fail on Hose
- 0.024% fail on Pipe
-
0.31% fail on
Body
- 0.26% fail on Other body component
- 0.047% fail on Panel
-
0.21% fail on
Seats
- 0.12% fail on Passenger's seat
- 0.094% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.16% fail on
Doors
(65% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.071% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.071% fail on Door condition
-
0.047% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.047% fail on Door condition
-
0.047% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.047% fail on Door condition
-
0.071% fail on
Front passenger's door
-
0.071% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.047% fail on Engine mounting condition
- 0.024% fail on Bracket
-
0.047% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(94% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.047% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (94% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.047% fail on Bumpers
-
0.024% fail on
Chassis
- 0.024% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.024% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.024% fail on Carrier
-
0.024% fail on
Towbar
- 0.024% fail on Towbar condition
- 0.024% fail on Floor
-
0.024% fail on
Cabs
- 0.024% fail on Prescribed areas
-
1.5% fail on
Tyres
(75% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.82% fail on Condition (69% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.66% fail on Tread depth (82% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.094% fail on Size/type
-
0.89% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(63% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.54% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.35% fail on
Seat belts
(77% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.26% fail on Condition (61% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.047% fail on Attachment
- 0.024% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.024% fail on Requirements
-
0.73% fail on
Steering
(86% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.47% fail on
Steering linkage components
(89% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.40% fail on Track rod end (90% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.071% fail on Ball joint
-
0.16% fail on
Power steering
(61% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.094% fail on Other components
- 0.071% fail on Pipes and hoses
-
0.12% fail on
Steering gear
(75% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.12% fail on Steering rack (73% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.047% fail on Steering column
-
0.47% fail on
Steering linkage components
(89% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.12% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(82% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.12% fail on Registration plates (82% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.047% fail on
Buses and coaches supplementary tests
-
0.024% fail on
Doors
- 0.024% fail on Emergency exits
- 0.024% fail on Passenger grab handles
-
0.024% fail on
Doors