Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

FIAT Ducato MOT Results

Registered in 2010
77.2% pass rate
from 4,544 tests in 2020
(47% better than other 2010 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Ducato is unusually good or bad.

  • 11% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (47% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.13% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (58% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Direction indicators (35% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Flashing type (35% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.66% fail on Individual direction indicators (64% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.044% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.5% fail on Stop lamp (75% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamps (56% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp (59% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.2% fail on Outline marker lamps (190% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.95% fail on Outline marker lamp (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on All outline marker lamps (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Position lamps (68% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Position lamp (68% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.022% fail on All position lamps
    • 1.1% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (45% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (45% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (44% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.66% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.64% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.022% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.33% fail on Electrical equipment (69% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Horn (67% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.066% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.022% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.044% fail on Rear reflectors (87% better than other 2010 vans)
  • 6.7% fail on Brakes (50% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on Brake performance (23% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (19% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 3.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (20% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.066% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.022% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance (29% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt
          • 1.0% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.35% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.0% fail on Parking brake performance (38% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.0% fail on Rbt (37% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.86% fail on Parking brake performance (40% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.18% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.022% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.44% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (43% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.42% fail on Rbt (sp) (44% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.33% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.15% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.022% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.022% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.088% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.5% fail on Mechanical brake components (68% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.99% fail on Brake linings and pads (72% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.99% fail on Brake pads (72% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.53% fail on Brake discs and drums (65% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.53% fail on Brake discs (65% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.11% fail on Cable
        • 0.044% fail on Linkage
        • 0.022% fail on Lever
        • 0.022% fail on Relay lever
        • 0.022% fail on Clevis joint
        • 0.022% fail on Pivot
    • 0.55% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.55% fail on Lever
    • 0.33% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (63% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on Anti-lock braking system (56% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.26% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (61% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Pedal (75% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.13% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.088% fail on Rigid brake pipes (97% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.044% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.044% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 4.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (27% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Exhaust emissions (25% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.5% fail on Compression ignition (22% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.8% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 1.7% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.15% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.64% fail on Spark ignition (38% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.64% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.33% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.18% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.13% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.022% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 4.2% fail on Visibility (47% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Wipers (37% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Washers (52% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.20% fail on View to rear (75% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Mirrors (75% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.15% fail on Condition of glass (69% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Windscreen (68% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.088% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.044% fail on Bonnet
  • 4.0% fail on Suspension (72% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Suspension arms (50% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.97% fail on Pins and bushes (46% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.88% fail on Ball joint (60% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.53% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.022% fail on Suspension arm
    • 0.77% fail on Springs (79% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Coil springs (82% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.44% fail on Coil spring (82% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Leaf springs (71% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.20% fail on Leaf spring (78% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.088% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
        • 0.022% fail on Anchor bracket
        • 0.022% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
        • 0.022% fail on Shackle bracket
    • 0.73% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.37% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.26% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.066% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.044% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.022% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.13% fail on Wheel bearings (90% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Anti-roll bars (98% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.044% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (92% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.022% fail on Linkage
      • 0.022% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.022% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 0.066% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (82% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.022% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.022% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.022% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.022% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.022% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.022% fail on Bellows
  • 2.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure (62% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.84% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.62% fail on Transmission (83% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Drive shafts (81% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.57% fail on Joints (82% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.022% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.022% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.022% fail on Joints
    • 0.46% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.24% fail on System (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.066% fail on Tank
      • 0.022% fail on Pipe
    • 0.31% fail on Body
      • 0.20% fail on Other body component
      • 0.11% fail on Panel
    • 0.15% fail on Seats
      • 0.11% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.044% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.13% fail on Doors (63% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.066% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.044% fail on Door condition
        • 0.022% fail on Catch
      • 0.044% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.044% fail on Door condition
      • 0.022% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.022% fail on Door condition
    • 0.088% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.044% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.022% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.022% fail on Bracket
    • 0.044% fail on Undertray
    • 0.022% fail on Load security
      • 0.022% fail on Loading door
    • 0.022% fail on Floor
    • 0.022% fail on Cabs
      • 0.022% fail on Steps
  • 2.0% fail on Tyres (66% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.99% fail on Tread depth (74% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.97% fail on Condition (59% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.15% fail on Size/type
  • 0.68% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (62% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.37% fail on Seat belts (65% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Condition
      • 0.022% fail on Attachment
    • 0.26% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (65% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.044% fail on Airbags
      • 0.044% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.66% fail on Steering (86% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.44% fail on Steering linkage components (89% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on Track rod end (91% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.066% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.022% fail on Other components
        • 0.022% fail on Steering linkage
      • 0.022% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.13% fail on Power steering (66% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.066% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.066% fail on Other components
    • 0.088% fail on Steering gear (72% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.066% fail on Steering rack (76% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.022% fail on Operation
    • 0.022% fail on Steering play
      • 0.022% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.13% fail on Identification of the vehicle (80% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.13% fail on Registration plates (80% better than other 2010 vans)
  • 0.088% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.088% fail on Attachment
  • 0.044% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests
    • 0.022% fail on Doors
      • 0.022% fail on Passenger entrance/exit doors
    • 0.022% fail on Steps and stairs
      • 0.022% fail on Retractable steps