MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » FIAT » Ducato » 2010
Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

FIAT Ducato MOT Results

Registered in 2010
80.1% pass rate
from 3,940 tests in 2017
(50% better than other 2010 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Ducato is unusually good or bad.

  • 12% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (49% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.8% fail on Registration plate lamp (53% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.9% fail on Position lamps (59% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Front lamps (74% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.30% fail on All position lamps (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Direction indicators (29% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Flashing type (29% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Side repeaters (52% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.71% fail on Individual lamps (60% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.076% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.025% fail on Switch
    • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.5% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.025% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.025% fail on Switch
    • 1.4% fail on Headlamps (51% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp (50% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Stop lamp (76% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.25% fail on Horn (61% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.15% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.10% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.051% fail on Rear reflectors (83% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.025% fail on Battery
    • 0.025% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.025% fail on Lamp
    • 0.025% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 5.7% fail on Brakes (52% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.4% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.0% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.53% fail on Front wheels (43% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.10% fail on Brake imbalance (71% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.076% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.025% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.3% fail on Hub components (70% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Brake pads (66% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Brake discs (81% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.076% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.025% fail on Brake linings
    • 0.41% fail on ABS
    • 0.38% fail on Parking brake (55% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Condition (55% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.28% fail on Hydraulic systems (90% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Components (91% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.18% fail on Hoses
        • 0.051% fail on Pipes (98% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.025% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.025% fail on Operation
    • 0.20% fail on Service brake control components (69% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Pedal (69% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.18% fail on Anti-slip (69% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.025% fail on Condition
    • 0.13% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.051% fail on Cable
      • 0.025% fail on Lever
      • 0.025% fail on Clevis joint
      • 0.025% fail on Pivot
    • 0.10% fail on Restricted movement
  • 5.1% fail on Driver's view of the road (38% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Wipers (33% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Washers (45% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.86% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.18% fail on Mirrors (77% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.025% fail on Bonnet
  • 4.0% fail on Suspension (70% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Suspension arms (40% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (39% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.89% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.84% fail on Drive shafts (70% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.84% fail on Front drive shafts (70% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.84% fail on Constant velocity joints (69% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.63% fail on Shock absorbers (45% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.63% fail on Condition (45% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.33% fail on Leaf springs (56% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Pins and bushes
        • 0.20% fail on Shackle
        • 0.051% fail on Anchor
      • 0.076% fail on Condition (80% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.30% fail on Wheel bearings (72% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Front (74% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.076% fail on Rear
    • 0.20% fail on Coil springs (91% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Condition (91% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.13% fail on Anti-roll bars (97% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (96% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.025% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.051% fail on Macpherson strut (87% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.051% fail on Condition (87% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.025% fail on General condition
    • 0.025% fail on Air suspension
      • 0.025% fail on Suspension unit
    • 0.025% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.025% fail on Attachment
    • 0.025% fail on Axles
      • 0.025% fail on Clearance
    • 0.025% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.025% fail on Component mounting
  • 2.4% fail on Tyres (62% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Condition (45% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.99% fail on Tread depth (73% better than other 2010 vans)
  • 1.5% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 0.74% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.61% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.56% fail on System (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.025% fail on Tank
      • 0.025% fail on Cap
    • 0.13% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.051% fail on Emissions
  • 0.79% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.36% fail on Body condition
    • 0.20% fail on Doors
      • 0.076% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.051% fail on Emergency exits
      • 0.051% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.025% fail on Passenger entrance/exit doors (Class 5)
    • 0.15% fail on Seats
      • 0.15% fail on Drivers
    • 0.025% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.025% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.025% fail on Chassis
    • 0.025% fail on Body security
    • 0.025% fail on Load security
      • 0.025% fail on Access panel
  • 0.76% fail on Steering (80% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.53% fail on Steering system (84% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Track rod end (87% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.051% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.18% fail on Power steering
      • 0.15% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.025% fail on Operation
      • 0.025% fail on Other components
    • 0.051% fail on Steering operation
  • 0.58% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (55% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.33% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.28% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (52% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.051% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.25% fail on Seat belts (64% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Condition (75% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.076% fail on Attachment
      • 0.051% fail on Requirements
  • 0.15% fail on Registration plates and VIN (81% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.15% fail on Registration plate (81% better than other 2010 vans)
  • 0.051% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.025% fail on Condition
    • 0.025% fail on Attachment
  • 0.025% fail on Driving Controls and Speed Limiters
    • 0.025% fail on Speed limiter plate