FIAT Fiorino MOT Results

Registered in 2016
67.6% pass rate
from 534 tests in 2021
(20% worse than other 2016 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Fiorino is unusually good or bad.

  • 11% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (160% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.19% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.56% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.56% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.37% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.19% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.37% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.37% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.37% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.37% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.37% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.19% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.19% fail on Horn
  • 9.7% fail on Tyres (110% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 5.8% fail on Condition (140% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 4.5% fail on Tread depth (86% worse than other 2016 vans)
  • 6.0% fail on Suspension
    • 4.5% fail on Springs (190% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 4.5% fail on Coil springs (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 4.5% fail on Coil spring (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.75% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.37% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.19% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.19% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.37% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.37% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (11 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.37% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.19% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.19% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.19% fail on Wheel bearings
  • 5.6% fail on Brakes
    • 1.9% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.75% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.75% fail on Rbt
          • 0.37% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.37% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.37% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.37% fail on Rbt
          • 0.19% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.19% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.19% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.19% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.19% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.19% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 1.7% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Pedal (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.37% fail on Hand lever (6 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.19% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.19% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.56% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.56% fail on Lever
    • 0.56% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.56% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.19% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.19% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 4.3% fail on Visibility
    • 2.1% fail on Washers
    • 1.9% fail on Wipers
    • 0.37% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.37% fail on View to rear
      • 0.37% fail on Mirrors
  • 1.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 1.1% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.75% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.37% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.37% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.37% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.19% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.19% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.19% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.19% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 0.94% fail on Steering
    • 0.94% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.56% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.37% fail on Ball joint (9 times worse than other 2016 vans)
  • 0.75% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.37% fail on Doors
      • 0.37% fail on Driver's door (7 times worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.37% fail on Door condition (9 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.19% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.19% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.19% fail on Transmission
      • 0.19% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.19% fail on Joints
  • 0.37% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.37% fail on Condition (6 times worse than other 2016 vans)
  • 0.19% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.19% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.19% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.19% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.19% fail on Attachment