FIAT Scudo MOT Results

Registered in 1997
57.1% pass rate
from 63 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Scudo is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 11% fail on Headlamps
      • 11% fail on Headlamp (190% worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 7.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 7.9% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 6.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.8% fail on Position lamp
      • 1.6% fail on All position lamps
    • 6.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 6.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.6% fail on All direction indicators
        • 1.6% fail on Side repeaters
    • 3.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.6% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.6% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 17% fail on Brakes
    • 9.5% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.3% fail on Service brake performance
        • 6.3% fail on Rbt
          • 6.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 3.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 4.8% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 4.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 3.2% fail on Service brake performance
          • 3.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.6% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt
          • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 6.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 6.3% fail on Load sensing valves (3 times worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 1.6% fail on Reservoirs
    • 1.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.6% fail on Brake pads
  • 14% fail on Suspension
    • 6.3% fail on Sub-frames (4 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 4.8% fail on Sub-frame (40 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.2% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.6% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 3.2% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.6% fail on Axles
      • 1.6% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 1.6% fail on Springs
      • 1.6% fail on Coil springs
        • 1.6% fail on Coil spring
        • 1.6% fail on Mounting
    • 1.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.6% fail on Anti-roll bar
    • 1.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 11% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.8% fail on Fuel system
      • 3.2% fail on Pipe (10 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Tank
    • 4.8% fail on Transmission
      • 4.8% fail on Drive shafts
        • 4.8% fail on Joints
    • 3.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.6% fail on Chassis
      • 1.6% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.6% fail on Bumpers
  • 6.3% fail on Steering
    • 3.2% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 3.2% fail on Track rod end
    • 1.6% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.6% fail on Steering rack
    • 1.6% fail on Power steering
      • 1.6% fail on Other components
  • 6.3% fail on Visibility
    • 3.2% fail on Wipers
    • 3.2% fail on Washers
  • 4.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.2% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.6% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 1.6% fail on Other leaks
    • 1.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.6% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.6% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
  • 3.2% fail on Tyres
    • 3.2% fail on Condition
  • 1.6% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.6% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.6% fail on Requirements