MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » FIAT » Scudo » 2000

FIAT Scudo MOT Results

Registered in 2000
45.9% pass rate
from 464 tests in 2020
(13% worse than other 2000 vans)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Scudo is unusually good or bad.

  • 27% fail on Suspension (37% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 13% fail on Suspension arms (150% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 8.0% fail on Ball joint (170% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 4.5% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Pins and bushes (130% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Suspension arm
    • 9.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 7.5% fail on Sub-frames (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 4.3% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 3.2% fail on Sub-frame (17 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes (20 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.2% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.1% fail on Axles (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (17 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.86% fail on Springs (68% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.65% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.65% fail on Coil spring
      • 0.22% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.65% fail on Anti-roll bars (81% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.22% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.65% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.22% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.43% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.22% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.22% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.22% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.22% fail on Suspension rod
  • 22% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.7% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.86% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 4.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.4% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.86% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.22% fail on All direction indicators
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.7% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.2% fail on Position lamp
    • 3.0% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.9% fail on Horn
      • 0.65% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.65% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 1.9% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (55% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (55% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.43% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.22% fail on Main beam tell-tale
      • 0.22% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.22% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.22% fail on Switch
  • 18% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 8.2% fail on Exhaust system (93% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Transmission
      • 3.7% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.7% fail on Joints
      • 0.22% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.22% fail on Joints
    • 3.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 3.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 1.1% fail on Sub-frame (15 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Sub-frame condition (16 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Chassis
      • 3.0% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.5% fail on Doors
      • 0.86% fail on Other passenger's door (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.86% fail on Door condition (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.65% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.43% fail on Hinge (13 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.22% fail on Door condition
    • 0.86% fail on Seats
      • 0.86% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.65% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.22% fail on Hose
      • 0.22% fail on Pipe
      • 0.22% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.65% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.43% fail on Towbar
      • 0.43% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.43% fail on Body
      • 0.43% fail on Other body component
  • 16% fail on Brakes
    • 8.4% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.7% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 4.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 4.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.86% fail on Service brake performance (74% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 4.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.1% fail on Rbt
          • 3.7% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.86% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (58% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt (sp) (57% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.65% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.65% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.65% fail on Rbt
          • 0.65% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 3.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.9% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.22% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.86% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.86% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.43% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.43% fail on Cable
    • 2.4% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 1.1% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.86% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.43% fail on Pedal
      • 0.43% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.65% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.43% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.22% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.43% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.43% fail on Lever
    • 0.22% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.22% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.22% fail on Other braking system component
  • 11% fail on Visibility
    • 5.8% fail on Wipers
    • 4.3% fail on Washers
    • 1.7% fail on View to rear
      • 1.7% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.22% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.22% fail on Windscreen
  • 9.1% fail on Steering
    • 5.4% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 5.2% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.22% fail on Drag link end
    • 2.8% fail on Steering gear
      • 2.8% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.86% fail on Power steering
      • 0.65% fail on Other components
      • 0.22% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.65% fail on Steering play
      • 0.65% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.22% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 7.5% fail on Tyres
    • 4.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.4% fail on Condition
    • 0.22% fail on Size/type
  • 6.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.4% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.5% fail on Compression ignition
        • 2.4% fail on Emissions not tested (180% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.43% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (6 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.22% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 0.86% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.43% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.43% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.3% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.1% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.22% fail on Other leaks
  • 1.5% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (69% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Seat belts (65% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.86% fail on Condition
      • 0.43% fail on Prescribed areas (87% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Requirements
  • 0.22% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.22% fail on Speedometer