FIAT Scudo MOT Results
Registered in 200046.2% pass rate
from 749 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Scudo is unusually good or bad.
-
31% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
-
11% fail on
Position lamps
(57% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 7.3% fail on Front lamps (56% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 4.3% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.27% fail on All position lamps
- 10% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 6.0% fail on Stop lamp
-
5.7% fail on
Direction indicators
(57% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
5.7% fail on
Flashing type
(57% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 4.8% fail on Individual lamps (98% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.67% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.27% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.13% fail on Switch
-
5.7% fail on
Flashing type
(57% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 5.1% fail on Headlamp aim
-
4.7% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.7% fail on Headlamp
-
1.9% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(56% better than other 2000 vans)
- 1.9% fail on Fog lamp (54% better than other 2000 vans)
- 1.5% fail on Horn
- 0.93% fail on Battery
-
0.27% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.13% fail on Lamp
- 0.13% fail on Switch
- 0.13% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.13% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.13% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.13% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
11% fail on
Position lamps
(57% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
28% fail on
Suspension
(19% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
9.9% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 5.9% fail on Subframe mounting (180% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 4.7% fail on Component mounting
- 0.53% fail on Spring mounting (87% better than other 2000 vans)
-
9.5% fail on
Suspension arms
(150% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 9.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (160% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Attachment
-
5.2% fail on
Drive shafts
-
5.2% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 5.2% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
5.2% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 4.0% fail on Front suspension joints
-
3.9% fail on
Sub-frames
(11 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 3.6% fail on Condition (14 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.13% fail on Attachment
-
2.4% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 2.4% fail on Condition
-
1.6% fail on
Trailing arms
(11 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (10 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.27% fail on Attachment (22 times worse than other 2000 vans)
-
1.1% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.93% fail on Front
- 0.13% fail on Rear
-
0.80% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.53% fail on Condition
- 0.27% fail on Location (6 times worse than other 2000 vans)
-
0.53% fail on
Radius arms
(8 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.53% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (9 times worse than other 2000 vans)
-
0.53% fail on
Panhard rods
(14 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.27% fail on Condition (10 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.27% fail on Attachment (22 times worse than other 2000 vans)
-
0.27% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.13% fail on Condition
- 0.13% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.27% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.27% fail on Condition
-
0.13% fail on
Bonded suspension
- 0.13% fail on Condition
-
0.13% fail on
Torque/reaction arms
- 0.13% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.13% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.13% fail on Linkage condition
-
0.13% fail on
Axles
- 0.13% fail on Swivel joints/housing
-
9.9% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
21% fail on
Brakes
-
12% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
11% fail on
Components
- 4.9% fail on Pipes
- 3.9% fail on Valves
- 3.5% fail on Hoses (72% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.67% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.13% fail on Servos
- 0.40% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.13% fail on Operation
-
11% fail on
Components
-
9.9% fail on
Brake performance
- 4.8% fail on Front wheels
- 4.3% fail on Rear wheels
- 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.6% fail on Brake imbalance
- 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance (80% better than other 2000 vans)
-
3.1% fail on
Hub components
- 1.6% fail on Brake discs
- 1.3% fail on Brake pads
- 0.13% fail on Brake linings
- 0.13% fail on Brake drums
- 0.13% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.13% fail on Wheel cylinder
-
0.67% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.67% fail on Condition
-
0.67% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.67% fail on
Pedal
- 0.40% fail on Anti-slip
- 0.27% fail on Condition
-
0.67% fail on
Pedal
-
0.40% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.40% fail on Cable
- 0.27% fail on ABS
- 0.13% fail on Restricted movement
-
12% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
13% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 8.1% fail on Wipers
- 4.4% fail on Washers
- 1.9% fail on Mirrors (120% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.53% fail on Windscreen
-
12% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(36% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 10% fail on Exhaust system (79% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 1.5% fail on Emissions not tested
- 1.2% fail on Emissions
-
0.53% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.40% fail on System
- 0.13% fail on Pipe
-
10% fail on
Tyres
(39% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 5.5% fail on Tread depth
- 5.2% fail on Condition (55% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.40% fail on Size/type
-
9.9% fail on
Steering
-
8.3% fail on
Steering system
- 4.8% fail on Track rod end
- 2.4% fail on Steering rack
- 0.80% fail on Ball joint
-
0.27% fail on
Free play
- 0.27% fail on Steering rack
- 0.27% fail on Steering arm
-
2.0% fail on
Power steering
(120% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.80% fail on Other components (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.67% fail on Operation
- 0.53% fail on Rams (15 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.27% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.13% fail on Pump
-
0.13% fail on
Steering control
- 0.13% fail on Steering lock
- 0.13% fail on Steering operation
- 0.13% fail on Locking devices
- 0.13% fail on Prescribed areas
-
8.3% fail on
Steering system
-
6.5% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 2.7% fail on Body condition
-
2.3% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 2.3% fail on Chassis
-
1.5% fail on
Doors
- 0.93% fail on Passengers other (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.27% fail on Drivers
- 0.27% fail on Passengers front
-
0.27% fail on
Seats
- 0.13% fail on Passengers
- 0.13% fail on Drivers
- 0.27% fail on Spare wheel
- 0.13% fail on Engine mountings
- 0.13% fail on Speedometer
-
0.13% fail on
Load security
- 0.13% fail on Tailgate
-
2.8% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(51% better than other 2000 vans)
-
2.8% fail on
Seat belts
(46% better than other 2000 vans)
- 1.7% fail on Condition
- 0.67% fail on Prescribed areas (83% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.53% fail on Requirements
- 0.13% fail on Attachment
-
2.8% fail on
Seat belts
(46% better than other 2000 vans)
-
0.67% fail on
Towbars
- 0.40% fail on Vehicle structure
- 0.27% fail on Towbar
-
0.40% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.40% fail on Registration plate
-
0.27% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.27% fail on Attachment