FIAT Scudo MOT Results
Registered in 200149.0% pass rate
from 386 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2001 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Scudo is unusually good or bad.
-
25% fail on
Suspension
(33% worse than other 2001 vans)
- 14% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (67% worse than other 2001 vans)
-
9.6% fail on
Suspension arms
(84% worse than other 2001 vans)
- 4.4% fail on Ball joint
- 3.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover (120% worse than other 2001 vans)
- 2.6% fail on Pins and bushes
-
7.0% fail on
Sub-frames
(5 times worse than other 2001 vans)
- 4.1% fail on Sub-frame (23 times worse than other 2001 vans)
- 3.6% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2001 vans)
- 0.26% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.26% fail on Pins and bushes
-
2.6% fail on
Springs
-
2.1% fail on
Coil springs
- 2.1% fail on Coil spring
- 0.52% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
2.1% fail on
Coil springs
-
1.3% fail on
Axles
(6 times worse than other 2001 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (20 times worse than other 2001 vans)
-
1.0% fail on
Macpherson strut
(4 times worse than other 2001 vans)
- 1.0% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (9 times worse than other 2001 vans)
- 0.78% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.52% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.26% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.26% fail on Anti-roll bar
-
0.26% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.26% fail on Pins and bushes
-
21% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(39% worse than other 2001 vans)
-
8.8% fail on
Transmission
(110% worse than other 2001 vans)
-
8.5% fail on
Drive shafts
(180% worse than other 2001 vans)
- 8.5% fail on Joints (190% worse than other 2001 vans)
-
0.26% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.26% fail on Joints
-
8.5% fail on
Drive shafts
(180% worse than other 2001 vans)
- 5.7% fail on Exhaust system
-
4.9% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 4.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
1.3% fail on
Sub-frame
(26 times worse than other 2001 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Sub-frame condition (28 times worse than other 2001 vans)
-
3.6% fail on
Chassis
- 3.6% fail on Chassis condition
-
1.3% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.78% fail on Pipe (4 times worse than other 2001 vans)
- 0.52% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
1.3% fail on
Seats
- 1.0% fail on Passenger's seat (3 times worse than other 2001 vans)
- 0.26% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.52% fail on
Towbar
- 0.52% fail on Other towbar components (7 times worse than other 2001 vans)
-
0.52% fail on
Body
- 0.26% fail on Panel
- 0.26% fail on Other body component
-
0.52% fail on
Doors
-
0.52% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.26% fail on Door condition
- 0.26% fail on Catch
-
0.52% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
0.26% fail on
Load security
- 0.26% fail on Loading door
-
8.8% fail on
Transmission
(110% worse than other 2001 vans)
-
17% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
5.4% fail on
Direction indicators
-
5.4% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.1% fail on Side repeaters (150% worse than other 2001 vans)
- 2.8% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.26% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.26% fail on Switch
-
5.4% fail on
Flashing type
-
4.4% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.4% fail on Headlamp
- 3.9% fail on Stop lamp
- 2.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
2.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
-
1.3% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.0% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.26% fail on Horn
-
0.78% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(80% better than other 2001 vans)
-
0.78% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(80% better than other 2001 vans)
- 0.78% fail on Rear fog lamp (80% better than other 2001 vans)
-
0.78% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(80% better than other 2001 vans)
-
0.26% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.26% fail on Position lamp
-
0.26% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.26% fail on Switch
-
5.4% fail on
Direction indicators
-
15% fail on
Brakes
-
7.3% fail on
Brake performance
(42% better than other 2001 vans)
-
4.4% fail on
Service brake performance
-
4.1% fail on
Rbt
- 3.6% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.52% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.26% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.26% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
4.1% fail on
Rbt
-
3.1% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
3.1% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 1.8% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
3.1% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
2.1% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(62% better than other 2001 vans)
- 2.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (62% better than other 2001 vans)
-
0.78% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.78% fail on
Rbt
- 0.52% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.26% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.78% fail on
Rbt
- 0.26% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
4.4% fail on
Service brake performance
- 4.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
3.4% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.8% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.8% fail on Brake discs
-
1.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.3% fail on Brake pads
-
0.52% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.52% fail on Cable
-
1.8% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 2.1% fail on Load sensing valves
- 1.0% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.78% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.78% fail on Pedal
-
0.78% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.52% fail on Reservoirs (6 times worse than other 2001 vans)
- 0.26% fail on Valves
-
0.26% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.26% fail on Lever
-
0.26% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.26% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.26% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.26% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
7.3% fail on
Brake performance
(42% better than other 2001 vans)
-
15% fail on
Visibility
(40% worse than other 2001 vans)
- 8.0% fail on Wipers
- 6.0% fail on Washers
-
2.1% fail on
View to rear
(2 times worse than other 2001 vans)
- 2.1% fail on Mirrors (2 times worse than other 2001 vans)
-
0.52% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.52% fail on Windscreen
- 0.26% fail on Bonnet
-
6.5% fail on
Steering
-
3.1% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 2.8% fail on Track rod end
- 0.26% fail on Ball joint
-
2.6% fail on
Steering gear
- 2.6% fail on Steering rack
-
0.78% fail on
Power steering
- 0.52% fail on Operation
- 0.26% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.26% fail on Steering wheel
-
3.1% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
5.4% fail on
Tyres
- 3.9% fail on Tread depth
- 1.6% fail on Condition
- 0.26% fail on Size/type
-
4.1% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
2.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.3% fail on
Compression ignition
- 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.52% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.26% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.26% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
0.26% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.26% fail on Catalyst emissions
-
2.3% fail on
Compression ignition
-
1.8% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 1.3% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.26% fail on Transmission oil leaks
- 0.26% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
- 0.26% fail on Other leaks
-
2.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
1.8% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
1.3% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.78% fail on Condition
- 0.26% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.26% fail on Requirements
- 0.52% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
1.3% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.52% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.52% fail on Registration plates
-
0.52% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.52% fail on Attachment