MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » FIAT » Scudo » 2001

FIAT Scudo MOT Results

Registered in 2001
47.2% pass rate
from 1,094 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2001 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Scudo is unusually good or bad.

  • 29% fail on Suspension (21% worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 14% fail on Prescribed areas (33% worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 8.8% fail on Component mounting (40% worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 5.7% fail on Subframe mounting (2 times worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Spring mounting (61% better than other 2001 vans)
    • 8.1% fail on Suspension arms (86% worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 8.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (92% worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 6.5% fail on Drive shafts (72% worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 6.4% fail on Front drive shafts (75% worse than other 2001 vans)
        • 6.2% fail on Constant velocity joints (72% worse than other 2001 vans)
        • 0.18% fail on Couplings
      • 0.091% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.091% fail on Drive shafts
    • 3.5% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 2.8% fail on Sub-frames (10 times worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Condition (13 times worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.55% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (12 times worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.091% fail on Attachment
    • 2.7% fail on Coil springs (74% worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Condition (69% worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Location
    • 1.4% fail on Trailing arms (7 times worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (9 times worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Wheel bearings (60% better than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.55% fail on Front (72% better than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.46% fail on Rear
    • 0.82% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.82% fail on Condition
    • 0.55% fail on Radius arms (7 times worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.55% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (8 times worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 0.37% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.37% fail on Condition
    • 0.18% fail on Torque/reaction arms (16 times worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (16 times worse than other 2001 vans)
  • 29% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 11% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 9.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 7.1% fail on Front lamps (36% worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Rear lamps
    • 6.8% fail on Direction indicators (64% worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 6.8% fail on Flashing type (64% worse than other 2001 vans)
        • 4.2% fail on Individual lamps (60% worse than other 2001 vans)
        • 3.5% fail on Side repeaters (180% worse than other 2001 vans)
        • 0.46% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.18% fail on Tell tales
        • 0.091% fail on Switch
    • 5.6% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 5.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.0% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.091% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.091% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 5.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.0% fail on Battery
    • 0.73% fail on Rear fog lamp (83% better than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.64% fail on Fog lamp (85% better than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.091% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.27% fail on Horn (91% better than other 2001 vans)
    • 0.091% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 20% fail on Brakes
    • 10% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 9.7% fail on Components
        • 4.6% fail on Pipes
        • 3.0% fail on Valves
        • 2.9% fail on Hoses (76% worse than other 2001 vans)
        • 0.55% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.18% fail on Cylinders
      • 0.82% fail on Leaks
      • 0.37% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.18% fail on Operation
    • 10% fail on Brake performance (25% better than other 2001 vans)
      • 6.2% fail on Front wheels
      • 3.3% fail on Rear wheels (41% better than other 2001 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Service brake performance (41% better than other 2001 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance (81% better than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.1% fail on Hub components
      • 2.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.18% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.091% fail on Brake drums
    • 0.55% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.55% fail on Condition
    • 0.27% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.27% fail on Pedal
        • 0.27% fail on Condition
    • 0.27% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.27% fail on Cable
    • 0.091% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.091% fail on Restricted movement
  • 13% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 8.1% fail on Wipers
    • 5.2% fail on Washers
    • 1.5% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.82% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.091% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.091% fail on Bonnet
  • 12% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (47% worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 9.1% fail on Exhaust system (86% worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Emissions
    • 1.5% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.73% fail on System
      • 0.46% fail on Cap
      • 0.18% fail on Pipe
      • 0.091% fail on Hose
    • 0.82% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 9.6% fail on Tyres
    • 6.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.7% fail on Condition
    • 0.37% fail on Size/type
  • 6.8% fail on Steering
    • 5.4% fail on Steering system
      • 3.2% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.5% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.46% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.27% fail on Free play
        • 0.27% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.18% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.091% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.091% fail on Other components
        • 0.091% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 1.6% fail on Power steering
      • 0.82% fail on Operation
      • 0.55% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.27% fail on Drive system (5 times worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Other components
    • 0.18% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.091% fail on Steering control
      • 0.091% fail on Steering column
    • 0.091% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 6.6% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 3.0% fail on Body condition
    • 2.2% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 2.2% fail on Chassis
    • 1.2% fail on Doors
      • 0.82% fail on Passengers other (160% worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.18% fail on Drivers
    • 0.37% fail on Seats
      • 0.27% fail on Drivers
      • 0.091% fail on Passengers
    • 0.18% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.18% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.18% fail on Load security
      • 0.18% fail on Loading door
    • 0.18% fail on Spare wheel
  • 2.9% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (48% better than other 2001 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Seat belts (39% better than other 2001 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Condition (96% worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.82% fail on Requirements (2 times worse than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.37% fail on Prescribed areas (90% better than other 2001 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (82% better than other 2001 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (81% better than other 2001 vans)
  • 1.4% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate
  • 1.0% fail on Towbars
    • 0.91% fail on Vehicle structure (160% worse than other 2001 vans)
    • 0.091% fail on Towbar
  • 0.091% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.091% fail on Attachment