FIAT Scudo MOT Results
Registered in 200249.9% pass rate
from 397 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Scudo is unusually good or bad.
-
22% fail on
Suspension
- 12% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (70% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
11% fail on
Suspension arms
(81% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 5.0% fail on Ball joint
- 4.8% fail on Pins and bushes (190% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 1.5% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.50% fail on Suspension arm
-
3.3% fail on
Springs
-
3.0% fail on
Coil springs
- 3.0% fail on Coil spring
- 0.25% fail on Mounting
- 0.25% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
3.0% fail on
Coil springs
-
3.0% fail on
Sub-frames
(2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 1.8% fail on Sub-frame (7 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
1.8% fail on
Axles
(6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 1.5% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (17 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.25% fail on Axle
-
0.76% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.50% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.25% fail on Macpherson strut
-
0.50% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.25% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.25% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.25% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.25% fail on Shock absorbers
-
21% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(36% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 8.3% fail on Exhaust system (150% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
7.6% fail on
Transmission
-
7.3% fail on
Drive shafts
(93% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 7.3% fail on Joints (95% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
0.25% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.25% fail on Joints
-
7.3% fail on
Drive shafts
(93% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
4.0% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 3.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.76% fail on
Sub-frame
(16 times worse than other 2002 vans)
- 0.76% fail on Sub-frame condition (17 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
2.8% fail on
Chassis
- 2.8% fail on Chassis condition
-
1.5% fail on
Doors
-
0.76% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.76% fail on Door condition
-
0.50% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.50% fail on Door condition
-
0.25% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.25% fail on Door condition
-
0.76% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
0.50% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.25% fail on Spare wheel condition
- 0.25% fail on Carrier
-
0.25% fail on
Towbar
- 0.25% fail on Vehicle structure
-
0.25% fail on
Seats
- 0.25% fail on Passenger's seat
-
19% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
5.8% fail on
Headlamps
- 5.8% fail on Headlamp
-
5.0% fail on
Direction indicators
-
5.0% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.5% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 2.0% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.50% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.50% fail on Switch (18 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
5.0% fail on
Flashing type
-
4.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.25% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 3.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 3.0% fail on Stop lamp
-
0.76% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(80% better than other 2002 vans)
-
0.76% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(80% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.76% fail on Rear fog lamp (80% better than other 2002 vans)
-
0.76% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(80% better than other 2002 vans)
-
0.50% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.50% fail on Position lamp
-
0.50% fail on
Electrical equipment
(79% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.50% fail on Battery(ies)
-
5.8% fail on
Headlamps
-
18% fail on
Brakes
-
8.6% fail on
Brake performance
-
4.0% fail on
Service brake performance
-
4.0% fail on
Rbt
- 3.3% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
4.0% fail on
Rbt
-
4.0% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
4.0% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 3.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
-
4.0% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
2.5% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(56% better than other 2002 vans)
- 2.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (60% better than other 2002 vans)
- 0.25% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
-
0.76% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.76% fail on
Rbt
- 0.76% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.76% fail on
Rbt
- 0.25% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
4.0% fail on
Service brake performance
- 6.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
6.0% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(100% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
3.3% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(150% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 3.3% fail on Brake discs (160% worse than other 2002 vans)
-
2.5% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.5% fail on Brake pads
-
1.0% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.76% fail on Cable
- 0.25% fail on Rod
-
3.3% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(150% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 3.0% fail on Load sensing valves
-
0.76% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.76% fail on Lever
- 0.76% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.25% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.25% fail on Pedal
-
0.25% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.25% fail on Reservoirs
-
0.25% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
-
0.25% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.25% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
-
0.25% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
8.6% fail on
Brake performance
-
14% fail on
Visibility
- 9.1% fail on Wipers (63% worse than other 2002 vans)
- 6.0% fail on Washers
-
1.0% fail on
View to rear
- 1.0% fail on Mirrors
-
0.76% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.76% fail on Windscreen
- 0.25% fail on Bonnet
-
7.6% fail on
Tyres
- 4.8% fail on Tread depth
- 2.8% fail on Condition
- 0.25% fail on Size/type
-
5.5% fail on
Steering
-
2.8% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 2.5% fail on Track rod end
- 0.25% fail on Ball joint
-
1.8% fail on
Steering gear
- 1.8% fail on Steering rack
-
0.50% fail on
Power steering
- 0.25% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.25% fail on Other components
-
0.25% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.25% fail on Flexible coupling
-
0.25% fail on
Steering play
- 0.25% fail on Steering rack
-
2.8% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
4.8% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
4.8% fail on
Seat belts
- 3.0% fail on Prescribed areas
- 1.5% fail on Condition
- 0.76% fail on Requirements (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
-
4.8% fail on
Seat belts
-
4.3% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
3.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
3.0% fail on
Compression ignition
- 1.8% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.50% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.50% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.25% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
0.25% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.25% fail on Catalyst emissions
-
3.0% fail on
Compression ignition
-
1.5% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 1.5% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
3.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
1.0% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.0% fail on Registration plates
-
0.25% fail on
Speedometer and speed limiter
- 0.25% fail on Speedometer