MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » FIAT » Scudo » 2002
Do you want the Road Tax system to change? Do you have thoughts on the potential changes to the Road Tax system? | No thanks

FIAT Scudo MOT Results

Registered in 2002
49.1% pass rate
from 1,030 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Scudo is unusually good or bad.

  • 29% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 11% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 7.9% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.4% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.9% fail on Rear lamps
    • 7.2% fail on Direction indicators (72% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 7.2% fail on Flashing type (72% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 4.0% fail on Individual lamps (50% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 3.1% fail on Side repeaters (160% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on All direction indicators (140% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.097% fail on Switch
    • 6.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.5% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.097% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.097% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
      • 0.097% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.097% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 4.7% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.3% fail on Battery
    • 0.97% fail on Rear fog lamp (76% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.78% fail on Fog lamp (81% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.097% fail on Switch
    • 0.49% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.29% fail on Switch
      • 0.19% fail on Lamp
    • 0.49% fail on Horn (80% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.19% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.19% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.097% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 25% fail on Suspension
    • 8.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 6.1% fail on Component mounting
      • 2.9% fail on Subframe mounting (110% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Spring mounting (90% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.9% fail on Drive shafts
      • 5.8% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 5.8% fail on Constant velocity joints
      • 0.097% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.097% fail on Drive shafts
    • 5.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 5.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.19% fail on Attachment
    • 4.0% fail on Sub-frames (13 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on Condition (14 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.68% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (14 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Attachment (5 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 3.2% fail on Coil springs
      • 3.1% fail on Condition
      • 0.097% fail on Location
    • 2.7% fail on Trailing arms (19 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (19 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Attachment (19 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.1% fail on Wheel bearings (59% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.68% fail on Front (65% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Rear
    • 0.68% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.68% fail on Condition
    • 0.29% fail on Anti-roll bars (94% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (93% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.097% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.19% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.19% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.19% fail on Shock absorbers (90% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Condition (90% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.097% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.097% fail on Condition
    • 0.097% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.097% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.097% fail on Panhard rods
      • 0.097% fail on Condition
  • 18% fail on Brakes (17% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 10% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 9.7% fail on Components
        • 3.8% fail on Valves
        • 3.3% fail on Pipes (47% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 3.3% fail on Hoses (130% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.49% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.68% fail on Leaks
      • 0.39% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.19% fail on Operation
    • 7.7% fail on Brake performance (41% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 4.3% fail on Front wheels
      • 2.7% fail on Rear wheels (53% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance (70% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance (50% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.68% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.097% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.5% fail on Hub components
      • 2.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.6% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.097% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.097% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 0.97% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.97% fail on Pedal
        • 0.58% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.39% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.87% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.87% fail on Condition
    • 0.29% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.29% fail on Cable
    • 0.19% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.19% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.19% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
  • 13% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 8.0% fail on Wipers
    • 5.2% fail on Washers
    • 1.7% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.97% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.097% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.097% fail on Bonnet
  • 11% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (54% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 9.0% fail on Exhaust system (100% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Emissions
    • 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.1% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.58% fail on System
      • 0.39% fail on Pipe
      • 0.097% fail on Cap
  • 9.7% fail on Tyres
    • 6.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.8% fail on Condition
    • 0.19% fail on Size/type
  • 5.9% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 2.3% fail on Body condition (41% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.9% fail on Chassis
    • 1.1% fail on Doors
      • 0.78% fail on Passengers other (160% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Drivers
      • 0.097% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.29% fail on Speedometer (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.29% fail on Spare wheel
    • 0.19% fail on Seats
      • 0.097% fail on Passengers
      • 0.097% fail on Drivers
  • 5.4% fail on Steering (28% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Steering system (40% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Track rod end (48% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.87% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.49% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.19% fail on Free play
        • 0.19% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.097% fail on Drag link end
    • 1.7% fail on Power steering
      • 0.78% fail on Pipes and hoses (170% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.49% fail on Operation
      • 0.49% fail on Other components
    • 0.097% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.097% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 5.0% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 4.9% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.7% fail on Condition
      • 0.97% fail on Requirements (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.097% fail on Attachment
    • 0.19% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (85% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (84% better than other 2002 vans)
  • 1.1% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.097% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.097% fail on Condition