MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » FIAT » Scudo » 2002
Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

FIAT Scudo MOT Results

Registered in 2002
46.8% pass rate
from 698 tests in 2020
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Scudo is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Suspension
    • 10% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (37% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 9.3% fail on Suspension arms (46% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 5.2% fail on Ball joint (54% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.3% fail on Pins and bushes (80% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.29% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.14% fail on Suspension arm
    • 5.2% fail on Sub-frames (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Sub-frame (16 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (180% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.57% fail on Pins and bushes (15 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 2.9% fail on Springs
      • 2.9% fail on Coil springs
        • 2.9% fail on Coil spring
    • 1.6% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.57% fail on Pins and bushes (7 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.57% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.29% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (10 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Other suspension component
    • 1.1% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.0% fail on Axles (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.86% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (11 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Axle
    • 1.0% fail on Macpherson strut (190% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.72% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.57% fail on Wheel bearings (74% better than other 2002 vans)
  • 22% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 6.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.29% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 6.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 6.0% fail on Direction indicators (63% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 6.0% fail on Flashing type (63% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 3.4% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 2.6% fail on Side repeaters (120% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.57% fail on All direction indicators
    • 5.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.7% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.43% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.7% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.4% fail on Electrical equipment (55% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.57% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.43% fail on Horn (81% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.14% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.43% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (88% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Rear fog lamp (88% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.43% fail on Rear fog lamp (88% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.29% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.29% fail on Switch
    • 0.14% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.14% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 21% fail on Body, chassis, structure (34% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 8.3% fail on Exhaust system (110% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 7.9% fail on Transmission (57% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 7.4% fail on Drive shafts (94% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 7.2% fail on Joints (89% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.14% fail on Drive shaft
        • 0.14% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.43% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.43% fail on Joints
    • 2.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.29% fail on Strengthening plate (19 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Chassis
      • 2.0% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.6% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.0% fail on Pipe (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.14% fail on Tank
    • 0.86% fail on Doors
      • 0.72% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.72% fail on Door condition
      • 0.29% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.14% fail on Door condition
        • 0.14% fail on Hinge
      • 0.14% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.14% fail on Door condition
    • 0.72% fail on Towbar
      • 0.72% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.72% fail on Body
      • 0.57% fail on Other body component
      • 0.14% fail on Panel
    • 0.29% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.14% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.14% fail on Bracket
    • 0.29% fail on Load security
      • 0.29% fail on Loading door (6 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.29% fail on Seats
      • 0.29% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.14% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.14% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.14% fail on Carrier
    • 0.14% fail on Floor
    • 0.14% fail on Cabs
      • 0.14% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 16% fail on Brakes (21% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 8.2% fail on Brake performance (35% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 5.0% fail on Service brake performance
        • 5.0% fail on Rbt
          • 4.0% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.14% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.14% fail on Service brake performance
      • 3.0% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (44% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 3.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (44% better than other 2002 vans)
          • 2.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance (60% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (78% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (78% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.0% fail on Rbt
          • 0.86% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.14% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.86% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.7% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.6% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.6% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.29% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.14% fail on Cable
        • 0.14% fail on Linkage
    • 3.0% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 1.1% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.86% fail on Pedal
      • 0.29% fail on Hand lever
    • 1.1% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.86% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.43% fail on Valves
      • 0.14% fail on Master cylinder
      • 0.14% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.14% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.57% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.57% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.43% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.14% fail on Other braking system component
    • 0.14% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.14% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 12% fail on Visibility
    • 7.0% fail on Wipers
    • 4.6% fail on Washers
    • 1.4% fail on View to rear
      • 1.3% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.14% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.14% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.14% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.14% fail on Windscreen
  • 7.7% fail on Tyres
    • 5.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.29% fail on Size/type
  • 6.2% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 6.2% fail on Seat belts (75% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 4.2% fail on Prescribed areas (62% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Condition
      • 0.57% fail on Requirements (4 times worse than other 2002 vans)
  • 5.9% fail on Steering
    • 3.3% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.9% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.43% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.14% fail on Locking devices
    • 1.4% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.4% fail on Steering rack
    • 1.1% fail on Power steering
      • 0.57% fail on Operation
      • 0.43% fail on Other components
      • 0.29% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.14% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.14% fail on Steering play
      • 0.14% fail on Steering rack
  • 5.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.0% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.9% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.7% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 1.3% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.29% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.29% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.14% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.14% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.43% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.14% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.14% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.14% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.14% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 1.1% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.86% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.29% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.14% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.14% fail on Sound deadening material
  • 1.3% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plates
    • 0.14% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.14% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.14% fail on Attachment