FIAT Scudo MOT Results
Registered in 200349.4% pass rate
from 626 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Scudo is unusually good or bad.
-
22% fail on
Suspension
- 10% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (43% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
7.7% fail on
Suspension arms
- 4.2% fail on Ball joint
- 2.7% fail on Pins and bushes
- 1.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.32% fail on Suspension arm
-
3.8% fail on
Springs
-
3.5% fail on
Coil springs
- 3.4% fail on Coil spring
- 0.32% fail on Mounting (6 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.32% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
3.5% fail on
Coil springs
-
2.4% fail on
Sub-frames
(200% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.80% fail on Sub-frame (4 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.32% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2003 vans)
-
1.1% fail on
Macpherson strut
(2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.64% fail on Macpherson strut (17 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.48% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.96% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.96% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.48% fail on Ball joint
- 0.32% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.16% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.16% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.80% fail on
Axles
(3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.80% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (9 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.64% fail on Shock absorbers
-
21% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(39% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
9.4% fail on
Transmission
(90% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
8.8% fail on
Drive shafts
(110% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 8.6% fail on Joints (110% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.16% fail on Bearing housing
-
0.64% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.64% fail on Joints
-
8.8% fail on
Drive shafts
(110% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 7.2% fail on Exhaust system (120% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
4.8% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 4.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.16% fail on
Sub-frame
- 0.16% fail on Sub-frame condition
-
1.4% fail on
Chassis
- 1.3% fail on Chassis condition
- 0.16% fail on Strengthening plate
-
0.80% fail on
Doors
-
0.32% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.32% fail on Door condition
-
0.32% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.32% fail on Door condition
-
0.16% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.16% fail on Door condition
-
0.32% fail on
Front passenger's door
-
0.48% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.16% fail on Tank
- 0.16% fail on Hose
- 0.16% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.32% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.32% fail on Carrier
-
0.32% fail on
Towbar
- 0.16% fail on Other towbar components
- 0.16% fail on Vehicle structure
-
0.32% fail on
Cabs
- 0.32% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.16% fail on Bumpers
-
0.16% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.16% fail on Engine mounting condition
-
0.16% fail on
Body
- 0.16% fail on Body condition
-
0.16% fail on
Seats
- 0.16% fail on Passenger's seat
-
9.4% fail on
Transmission
(90% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
16% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(24% better than other 2003 vans)
- 5.1% fail on Stop lamp
-
5.0% fail on
Direction indicators
-
5.0% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 2.6% fail on Side repeaters (120% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.16% fail on All direction indicators
-
5.0% fail on
Flashing type
-
3.2% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.9% fail on Headlamp
- 0.32% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 3.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
2.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
(53% better than other 2003 vans)
- 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim (50% better than other 2003 vans)
-
1.4% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(59% better than other 2003 vans)
-
1.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(59% better than other 2003 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (59% better than other 2003 vans)
-
1.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(59% better than other 2003 vans)
-
0.96% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.64% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.16% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.16% fail on Horn
-
0.32% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.32% fail on Switch
-
16% fail on
Brakes
-
7.7% fail on
Brake performance
(39% better than other 2003 vans)
-
4.3% fail on
Service brake performance
-
4.2% fail on
Rbt
- 3.5% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.80% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.16% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.16% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
4.2% fail on
Rbt
-
4.2% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
4.2% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 2.7% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
-
4.2% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
1.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(79% better than other 2003 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (79% better than other 2003 vans)
-
0.96% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.96% fail on
Rbt
- 0.96% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.96% fail on
Rbt
-
4.3% fail on
Service brake performance
- 4.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 3.2% fail on Load sensing valves
-
1.9% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.1% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.1% fail on Brake pads
-
0.80% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.80% fail on Brake discs
-
0.16% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.16% fail on Cable
-
1.1% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.80% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.80% fail on Pedal
-
0.32% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.32% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.32% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.32% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.32% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
0.16% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.16% fail on Servos
-
0.16% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.16% fail on Other components
-
7.7% fail on
Brake performance
(39% better than other 2003 vans)
-
13% fail on
Visibility
- 7.3% fail on Wipers
- 4.8% fail on Washers
-
1.4% fail on
View to rear
(140% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Mirrors (150% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.48% fail on Bonnet
-
0.48% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.32% fail on Windscreen
- 0.16% fail on Window
-
8.8% fail on
Tyres
(47% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 6.2% fail on Tread depth (78% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 2.7% fail on Condition
- 0.64% fail on Size/type
-
5.8% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
5.6% fail on
Seat belts
(68% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 2.9% fail on Prescribed areas
- 2.1% fail on Condition (150% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.64% fail on Requirements (4 times worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.16% fail on Attachment
- 0.16% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
5.6% fail on
Seat belts
(68% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
3.7% fail on
Steering
(48% better than other 2003 vans)
-
2.6% fail on
Steering linkage components
(47% better than other 2003 vans)
- 2.6% fail on Track rod end
-
0.80% fail on
Power steering
- 0.32% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.32% fail on Other components
- 0.16% fail on Operation
-
0.64% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.64% fail on Steering rack
-
2.6% fail on
Steering linkage components
(47% better than other 2003 vans)
-
3.5% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
2.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.1% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.96% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.64% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.32% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.16% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.32% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.16% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.16% fail on Emissions not tested
-
2.1% fail on
Compression ignition
-
1.4% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 1.4% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.16% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
-
2.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.64% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.64% fail on Registration plates
-
0.16% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.16% fail on Attachment