FIAT Scudo MOT Results

Registered in 2004
47.4% pass rate
from 1,674 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Scudo is unusually good or bad.

  • 28% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 9.5% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 8.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.5% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.4% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.12% fail on All position lamps
    • 7.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 5.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 5.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.5% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 1.8% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.36% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.24% fail on Switch
        • 0.12% fail on Tell tales (5 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 4.8% fail on Stop lamp (35% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.4% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.060% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.060% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 1.6% fail on Battery
    • 1.2% fail on Horn
    • 0.78% fail on Rear fog lamp (76% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.66% fail on Fog lamp (79% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.060% fail on Switch
    • 0.24% fail on Hazard warning (72% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Lamp
      • 0.060% fail on Switch
    • 0.24% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.18% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.12% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.060% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 26% fail on Suspension
    • 10% fail on Drive shafts (130% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 10% fail on Front drive shafts (140% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 10% fail on Constant velocity joints (140% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.060% fail on Couplings
        • 0.060% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.060% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.060% fail on Drive shafts
    • 7.8% fail on Suspension arms (68% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 7.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (68% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Condition
      • 0.12% fail on Attachment
    • 4.1% fail on Prescribed areas (39% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Component mounting (34% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Subframe mounting
      • 0.36% fail on Spring mounting (88% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Coil springs
      • 3.6% fail on Condition
      • 0.12% fail on Location
    • 3.0% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 2.4% fail on Trailing arms (19 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (18 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Attachment (38 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.060% fail on Condition
    • 2.3% fail on Sub-frames (9 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Condition (9 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.72% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (14 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Attachment (6 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.96% fail on Wheel bearings (59% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.60% fail on Front (69% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Rear
    • 0.42% fail on Axles (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Swivel joints/housing (25 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Axle beam (6 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.36% fail on Radius arms (5 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (6 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.30% fail on Anti-roll bars (96% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Linkage condition (79% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.060% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.060% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.060% fail on Presence
    • 0.12% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.12% fail on Condition
    • 0.060% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.060% fail on Condition
    • 0.060% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.060% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.060% fail on Panhard rods
      • 0.060% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.060% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 18% fail on Brakes
    • 9.5% fail on Brake performance (18% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 4.7% fail on Front wheels (46% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 3.3% fail on Rear wheels (39% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance (74% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Brake imbalance (72% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.30% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.060% fail on Brake operation
    • 9.4% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 8.6% fail on Components
        • 4.8% fail on Pipes
        • 3.6% fail on Valves (140% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.66% fail on Hoses
        • 0.48% fail on Reservoirs (190% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.060% fail on Servos
      • 0.54% fail on Leaks
      • 0.36% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.30% fail on Operation
    • 2.4% fail on Hub components
      • 1.9% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.72% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.060% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.060% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 1.4% fail on Service brake control components (96% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Pedal (96% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Anti-slip (130% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.060% fail on Condition
    • 0.48% fail on Parking brake (63% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.48% fail on Condition (62% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.48% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.48% fail on Cable
    • 0.36% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.12% fail on ABS (90% better than other 2004 vans)
  • 13% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 7.7% fail on Wipers
    • 4.1% fail on Washers
    • 1.5% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.90% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.18% fail on Bonnet
  • 10% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (61% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 7.8% fail on Exhaust system (99% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.1% fail on System (180% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Pipe (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Cap
    • 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested (120% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Emissions
  • 10% fail on Tyres
    • 6.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 4.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.36% fail on Size/type
    • 0.060% fail on Valve stem
  • 5.7% fail on Steering
    • 4.7% fail on Steering system
      • 3.6% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.72% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.60% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.12% fail on Free play
        • 0.12% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.12% fail on Steering arm
    • 1.1% fail on Power steering
      • 0.42% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.42% fail on Other components
      • 0.36% fail on Operation
      • 0.060% fail on Drive system
      • 0.060% fail on Pump
    • 0.12% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.060% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.060% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 4.1% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (36% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Body condition (43% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.90% fail on Vehicle structure (49% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.90% fail on Chassis (49% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.66% fail on Doors
      • 0.48% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.12% fail on Drivers
      • 0.060% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.36% fail on Spare wheel
    • 0.12% fail on Seats
      • 0.12% fail on Passengers
    • 0.060% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.060% fail on Speedometer
  • 2.9% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (45% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.0% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.60% fail on Condition
      • 0.18% fail on Requirements
      • 0.060% fail on Attachment
    • 0.12% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (93% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (92% better than other 2004 vans)
  • 0.72% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.72% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.18% fail on Towbars
    • 0.12% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.060% fail on Towbar
  • 0.12% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.060% fail on Condition
    • 0.060% fail on Attachment