MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » FIAT » Scudo » 2005

FIAT Scudo MOT Results

Registered in 2005
50.2% pass rate
from 1,663 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Scudo is unusually good or bad.

  • 32% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 9.8% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 9.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 8.4% fail on Front lamps (39% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Rear lamps (46% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 8.4% fail on Headlamp aim (33% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 5.1% fail on Stop lamp (28% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.9% fail on Headlamp
    • 4.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.2% fail on Side repeaters (130% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Individual lamps (47% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.72% fail on Switch (9 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.36% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.060% fail on Tell tales
    • 3.8% fail on Horn (120% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.84% fail on Battery
    • 0.78% fail on Rear fog lamp (74% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.78% fail on Fog lamp (74% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.24% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.24% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.24% fail on Lamp
    • 0.18% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.18% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.12% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 24% fail on Suspension
    • 10% fail on Drive shafts (160% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 10.0% fail on Front drive shafts (170% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 9.9% fail on Constant velocity joints (170% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.060% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.12% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.12% fail on Drive shafts
    • 7.9% fail on Suspension arms (75% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 7.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (78% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.060% fail on Attachment
    • 3.6% fail on Coil springs
      • 3.5% fail on Condition
      • 0.060% fail on Location
    • 3.1% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 2.6% fail on Trailing arms (21 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (22 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.060% fail on Attachment
    • 1.9% fail on Prescribed areas (62% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Component mounting (53% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.60% fail on Subframe mounting
      • 0.060% fail on Spring mounting
    • 1.6% fail on Sub-frames (8 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.90% fail on Condition (9 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.42% fail on Attachment (9 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (7 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Shock absorbers (44% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Condition (44% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.90% fail on Wheel bearings (60% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.84% fail on Front (54% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.060% fail on Rear
    • 0.24% fail on Radius arms (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Anti-roll bars (97% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (97% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.060% fail on Linkage condition
    • 0.060% fail on General condition
    • 0.060% fail on Gas suspension
      • 0.060% fail on Suspension unit
    • 0.060% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.060% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.060% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.060% fail on Condition
  • 14% fail on Brakes (25% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 7.2% fail on Brake performance (33% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 4.4% fail on Front wheels (53% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Rear wheels (48% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.96% fail on Parking brake performance (83% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.66% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.060% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.7% fail on Hydraulic systems (24% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 5.5% fail on Components
        • 3.1% fail on Pipes (42% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 2.3% fail on Valves (140% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.36% fail on Hoses
        • 0.30% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.060% fail on Servos
      • 0.24% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.18% fail on Operation
      • 0.18% fail on Leaks
    • 1.9% fail on Hub components (42% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.36% fail on Brake discs (63% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.060% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 1.1% fail on ABS
    • 0.84% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.84% fail on Pedal
        • 0.60% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.24% fail on Condition
    • 0.54% fail on Parking brake (56% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Condition (56% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.36% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.30% fail on Cable
      • 0.060% fail on Lever
    • 0.18% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.060% fail on Electronic stability system
  • 11% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.5% fail on Wipers
    • 4.0% fail on Washers
    • 0.96% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.42% fail on Windscreen (61% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on Bonnet
  • 9.9% fail on Tyres (23% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 6.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 4.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.48% fail on Size/type
    • 0.12% fail on Valve stem
  • 9.5% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (61% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 7.0% fail on Exhaust system (92% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Emissions
    • 1.3% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.84% fail on System (110% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Pipe
      • 0.12% fail on Cap
      • 0.060% fail on Tank
    • 0.96% fail on Emissions not tested (97% worse than other 2005 vans)
  • 5.3% fail on Steering
    • 4.3% fail on Steering system
      • 3.5% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.54% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.36% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.96% fail on Power steering
      • 0.48% fail on Operation
      • 0.42% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.18% fail on Other components
    • 0.060% fail on Steering operation
  • 3.4% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (37% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Body condition (41% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.78% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.78% fail on Chassis
    • 0.54% fail on Doors
      • 0.24% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.24% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.060% fail on Drivers
    • 0.18% fail on Speedometer (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.12% fail on Body security
    • 0.12% fail on Seats
      • 0.12% fail on Drivers
    • 0.060% fail on Spare wheel
  • 2.1% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (57% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Seat belts (63% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.60% fail on Condition
      • 0.48% fail on Prescribed areas (78% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.060% fail on Requirements
    • 0.96% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (48% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.96% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 0.72% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.72% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.12% fail on Towbars
    • 0.060% fail on Towbar
    • 0.060% fail on Vehicle structure
  • 0.12% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.12% fail on Attachment