FIAT Scudo MOT Results

Registered in 2009
51.6% pass rate
from 849 tests in 2020
(10% worse than other 2009 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Scudo is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 7.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 4.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.7% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.12% fail on All position lamps
    • 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.1% fail on Direction indicators (60% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 4.1% fail on Flashing type (60% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 2.8% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.71% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.59% fail on All direction indicators (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 3.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 3.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.12% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.82% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.47% fail on Horn
      • 0.24% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.12% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.47% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.24% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.24% fail on Switch
    • 0.12% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.12% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 16% fail on Brakes
    • 10% fail on Brake performance (34% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 7.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (43% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 7.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (44% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 4.8% fail on Parking brake performance (130% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 4.7% fail on Rbt (140% worse than other 2009 vans)
          • 4.0% fail on Parking brake performance (130% worse than other 2009 vans)
          • 0.71% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.12% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 2.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.5% fail on Rbt
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.71% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.82% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.82% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.47% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.35% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.35% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.8% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.4% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.4% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.59% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.24% fail on Cable
        • 0.24% fail on Linkage (8 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Lever
    • 2.1% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Pedal (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.71% fail on Hand lever (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.82% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.82% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.59% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.59% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.47% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.12% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.47% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.47% fail on Lever
    • 0.24% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.12% fail on Master cylinder
      • 0.12% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.12% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 16% fail on Suspension
    • 8.0% fail on Suspension arms (62% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 6.4% fail on Ball joint (160% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Ball joint dust cover (100% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.47% fail on Pins and bushes (74% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 6.5% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.1% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.6% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 1.5% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.94% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.82% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.12% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 1.5% fail on Springs (62% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Coil springs
        • 1.5% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.82% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.47% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.24% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.12% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.12% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.24% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.24% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.12% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.12% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 15% fail on Body, chassis, structure (87% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 10% fail on Transmission (180% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 9.9% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 9.8% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.24% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.24% fail on Joints
    • 4.6% fail on Exhaust system (150% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.47% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.24% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.24% fail on System
    • 0.47% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.47% fail on Engine mounting condition (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.24% fail on Chassis
      • 0.24% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.12% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.12% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.12% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.12% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.12% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.12% fail on Body
      • 0.12% fail on Panel
    • 0.12% fail on Doors
      • 0.12% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.12% fail on Door condition
    • 0.12% fail on Undertray
  • 9.4% fail on Visibility
    • 4.7% fail on Washers
    • 4.5% fail on Wipers
    • 0.35% fail on View to rear
      • 0.35% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.24% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.24% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.12% fail on Bonnet
  • 5.8% fail on Tyres
    • 3.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.12% fail on Size/type
  • 4.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (38% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Exhaust emissions (45% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 3.3% fail on Compression ignition (39% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 1.5% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.24% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.12% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.12% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.12% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.59% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.59% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.82% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.47% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.35% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.24% fail on Noise suppression (8 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Undertray (15 times worse than other 2009 vans)
  • 3.8% fail on Steering
    • 1.5% fail on Steering linkage components (60% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Track rod end (70% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.12% fail on Other components
        • 0.12% fail on Steering component
      • 0.12% fail on Locking devices
    • 1.2% fail on Steering gear (200% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Steering rack (200% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Operation
    • 0.94% fail on Power steering
      • 0.47% fail on Other components (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Operation
      • 0.12% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.12% fail on Pump
    • 0.12% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.12% fail on Steering play
      • 0.12% fail on Steering rack
  • 1.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.71% fail on Condition
      • 0.35% fail on Attachment (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Requirements
    • 0.71% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.35% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.24% fail on Registration plates
    • 0.12% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.24% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.24% fail on Attachment