FIAT Scudo MOT Results
Registered in 200951.0% pass rate
from 783 tests in 2017
(18% worse than other 2009 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 vans and highlighted areas where the FIAT Scudo is unusually good or bad.
-
31% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(22% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 11% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
10% fail on
Position lamps
(43% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 8.6% fail on Front lamps (55% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 1.8% fail on Rear lamps
- 9.3% fail on Stop lamp (41% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 6.0% fail on Headlamp aim
-
4.0% fail on
Direction indicators
-
4.0% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.7% fail on Individual lamps (120% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.26% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.13% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.13% fail on Switch
-
4.0% fail on
Flashing type
-
3.8% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.8% fail on Headlamp
-
2.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 2.0% fail on Fog lamp
-
0.38% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.38% fail on Lamp
- 0.38% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.26% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.26% fail on Horn
-
23% fail on
Suspension
(51% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
12% fail on
Drive shafts
(3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
-
11% fail on
Front drive shafts
(3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 11% fail on Constant velocity joints (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
-
0.13% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.13% fail on Drive shafts
-
11% fail on
Front drive shafts
(3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
-
7.3% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(49% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 5.5% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (63% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 1.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.26% fail on Attachment
- 0.26% fail on Linkage condition
-
5.7% fail on
Suspension arms
(110% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 5.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (120% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Attachment
- 2.8% fail on Front suspension joints (130% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
0.77% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.64% fail on Front
- 0.13% fail on Rear
-
0.64% fail on
Coil springs
(72% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.64% fail on Condition (72% better than other 2009 vans)
-
0.51% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.51% fail on Condition
-
0.38% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.26% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.13% fail on Condition
-
0.26% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.26% fail on Attachment (19 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.13% fail on General condition
-
12% fail on
Drive shafts
(3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
-
16% fail on
Brakes
(24% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
10% fail on
Brake performance
(54% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 8.2% fail on Parking brake performance (87% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 6.0% fail on Rear wheels (110% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Front wheels
- 0.51% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.13% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.13% fail on Brake operation
-
5.6% fail on
Hub components
- 4.7% fail on Brake pads
- 0.89% fail on Brake discs
- 0.64% fail on Brake calipers (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
-
2.0% fail on
Parking brake
(110% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 2.0% fail on Condition (110% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
1.9% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
1.5% fail on
Components
(53% better than other 2009 vans)
- 1.0% fail on Hoses
- 0.38% fail on Reservoirs (5 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Pipes
- 0.26% fail on Leaks
- 0.13% fail on Operation
-
1.5% fail on
Components
(53% better than other 2009 vans)
-
1.4% fail on
Service brake control components
(130% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
1.4% fail on
Pedal
(130% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Anti-slip
- 0.26% fail on Condition
-
1.4% fail on
Pedal
(130% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
0.38% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.26% fail on Cable
- 0.13% fail on Pivot
- 0.38% fail on Restricted movement
- 0.13% fail on ABS
-
10% fail on
Brake performance
(54% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
11% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 5.9% fail on Wipers
- 4.1% fail on Washers
- 1.3% fail on Windscreen
- 1.3% fail on Mirrors
- 0.13% fail on Bonnet
-
8.7% fail on
Tyres
- 6.1% fail on Tread depth (59% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 2.9% fail on Condition
- 0.13% fail on Size/type
-
6.4% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(170% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 5.7% fail on Exhaust system (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
-
0.51% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.38% fail on System
- 0.13% fail on Pipe
- 0.13% fail on Emissions
- 0.13% fail on Emissions not tested
-
3.4% fail on
Steering
-
2.2% fail on
Steering system
- 0.89% fail on Track rod end (66% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.77% fail on Steering rack
-
0.38% fail on
Free play
- 0.38% fail on Steering rack
- 0.13% fail on Drag link end
- 0.13% fail on Steering arm
-
1.3% fail on
Power steering
(2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.51% fail on Other components (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.38% fail on Operation
- 0.38% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.26% fail on Steering operation
-
2.2% fail on
Steering system
-
2.6% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
2.0% fail on
Seat belts
(130% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 1.5% fail on Condition (180% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.51% fail on Attachment (8 times worse than other 2009 vans)
-
0.64% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.51% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
- 0.13% fail on Drivers airbag
-
2.0% fail on
Seat belts
(130% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
1.9% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
0.77% fail on
Doors
- 0.38% fail on Passengers other
- 0.26% fail on Drivers
- 0.13% fail on Passengers front
- 0.51% fail on Engine mountings (5 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.26% fail on Body condition
-
0.26% fail on
Seats
- 0.13% fail on Passengers
- 0.13% fail on Drivers
- 0.26% fail on Spare wheel
-
0.77% fail on
Doors
-
0.77% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.77% fail on Registration plate